Sovereignty definition
Sovereignty means the supremacy of the state;
Sovereignty. God is sovereign over all events, but He does allow human freedom as He ▇▇▇▇▇. He has ultimate authority over all things past, present, and future and most importantly He is sovereign over our salvation (2 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ 7:28, 1 Chronicles 29:10-13, Psalms 103:19, Genesis 50:20, Romans 1:18-32; 8:28] ➡ Transcendence: God is completely distinct from anything else in the universe. It is comforting to know that his greatness and power is unsurpassed in all of the world (Genesis 1:1, Psalms 102:25-27, Isaiah 42:5, Acts 17:24, 1 ▇▇▇▇ 2:15-17).
Sovereignty means that the decree of sovereign makes law, and foreign courts cannot condemn influences persuading sovereign to make the decree.” Moscow Fire Ins. Co. of Moscow, Russia v. Bank of New York & Trust Co., 294 N.Y.S. 648, 662, 161 Misc. 903.; The people of this State, as the successors of its former sovereign, are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative. Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.) (1829), 21 Am. Dec. 89 10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18 C Em.Dom. Sec. 3, 228; 37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls Sec. 167; 48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7.
Examples of Sovereignty in a sentence
The chiefs of the Confederation of the United Tribes of New Zealand and the separate and independent Chiefs who have not become members of the Confederation, cede to Her Majesty the Queen of England, absolutely and without reservation, all rights and powers of Sovereignty which the said Confederation of Individual Chiefs respectively exercise or possess, or may be supposed to exercise or to possess over their respective Territories as the sole Sovereigns thereof.
Sovereignty in Jerusalem shall be in accordance with attached Map 2.
Sovereignty of all data collected and maintained by each Participating Agency remains with the Participating Agency.
Nothing in this clause shall require a Party to make amendments which in its reasonable belief would be inconsistent with the Sovereignty Guarantee.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, User acknowledges this Use Agreement is subject to that certain Sovereignty Submerged Land Lease Renewal and Modification to Reflect Current Structures, Reduce Term to Five Years and Remove Special Lease Condition (as may be further amended or renewed) with an effective date of July 1, 2008, between the City and the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund of the State of Florida (collectively “Sovereign Lease”).
More Definitions of Sovereignty
Sovereignty means that development of natural resources “must be exercised in the interest of their national development and of the well-being of the people of the State concerned” (Res.1803 UN GA of 14.12.1962)
Sovereignty. An Institutional Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 21, no. 1 (1988): 66–94. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇. Bernhard, and ▇. Hänggli. “The Politics of Campaigning – Dimensions of Strategic Action.” In Politik in der Mediendemokratie, edited by ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 345–365. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2009. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. “▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and the Catch-All Party.” West European Politics 26, no. 2 (2003): 23–40. . Party Transformations in European Democracies. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2012. . “The Catch-All Party in Western Europe, 1945-1990: A Study in Arrested Devel- opment.” PhD diss., Free University of Amsterdam, 1999. ▇▇▇▇, ▇.-E., and S. O. Ersson. Politics and Society in Western Europe. London: Sage, 1994. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., and ▇. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, eds. When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organisations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988. , eds. When Parties Prosper: the Uses of Electoral Success. Boulder: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2007. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review 65, no. 3 (1971): 682–693. . The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968. . Verzuiling, Pacificatie en Kentering in de Nederlandse Politiek. 1971. Haarlem: ▇▇▇▇▇, 1990 [1971]. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇., and ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, eds. Party Systems and voter alignments: cross-national perspectives. New York: Free Press, 1967. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. “Explaining Hamas’s Changing Electoral Strategy, 1996-2006.” Government and Opposition 48, no. 4 (2013): 570–593. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, R. F. M. Persoonlijke Herinneringen. Amsterdam: Balans, 2018. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29, no. 4 (2000): 507–548. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, S., ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇. España-Najera. “Extra- and within-system volatil- ity.” Party Politics 23, no. 6 (2017): 623–635. ▇▇▇▇, ▇. “Adaptation and Control: Towards an Understanding of Party and Party System Change (1983).” In On Parties, Party Systems and Democracy: Selected Writings of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, edited by I. van Biezen, 162–185. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2014. . “Electoral Volatility and the Dutch Party System: a Comparative Perspective.” . Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997. ▇▇▇▇, P., and I. van Biezen. “Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980- 2000.” Party Politics 7, no. 1 (2001): 5–21. ▇▇▇▇, P., and ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇. “The Party Family and its Study.” Annual Review of Political Scienc...
Sovereignty means the power to make and enforce law in general terms.93 It is more limited than Tino Rangatiratanga, as it derives only from human sources and manifests itself in human-made rules and laws.94. The sovereignty currently exercised by the Crown cannot co-exist with Tino Rangatiratanga. As the Tuhoe Report stated:
Sovereignty means the State's supreme or total powers, which can be exercised in the name of the body politic or the peopled To anticipate a more detailed discussion in chapter 3, it corresponds most specifically to the state's necessary functions in kind, that is, legal and coercive. There is no need, however, to distinguish between them here since we will only correlate the idea of 'political power' as a whole to Gottschalk's theory of revolutionary causation. Preliminarily, we may take 'political power' to mean 'power wielded in relation to the government or the state, either by it, or to affect it, or both. It is power directly or indirectly of and over government or the state'.63 Such a definition is, however, limited to how much power is actually exercised. In addition, we will also include how much can be exercised—that is, the amount of potential power. These powers may be said to be what and how much are 'necessary and sufficient' to the 'state' as this concept is defined—that is, in relation to people, territory, and government.64 This is a DQ (of the state) in kind. Needless to say, how much anyone can (or will) command may be less; but it cannot be more than such a theoretical limit. Comparatively, then, whereas the state's power is fixed in kind, its possession and use by anyone will fluctuate by degree according to various influences.
Sovereignty means the ability of a people, of each generation5 of citizens, to live under rules of their own choosing. After all, whose is a constitution? If the answer is “the citizens of country X”, this means nothing else than it is the constitution of the citizens current ly alive. This is the appropriate state of affairs since dead people can neither be benefited by possessing something, nor harmed by losing a property, including the capacity to rule after their death. But if a constitution is too difficult to change, the dead citizens of country X wield power over the living,6 and the past rules over the present. It might well not make a difference if those succeeding genera- tions share the values and views of their ancestors, but what if they happen not to? What if succeeding generations see some provi- sions of the constitution as a threat to their long-term well-being, or even as morally wrong? This problem is exacerbated when a sta- ble majority of the citizenry would like to reform the constitution but falls short of the required supermajority of 66% or even 75%. Can we call it “the rule of the people” or “popular sovereignty” if stable majorities (let’s say from 50% + 1 vote up to a three-fifths supermajority) of the present demos cannot change certain consti- tutional clauses for the simple reason that their forefathers put the bar for changing the constitution extremely high? “Generational sovereignty”7 is closely linked to the concept of “legitimacy” for two reasons, namely that
Sovereignty. The Supreme Court ducks. Con- ▇▇▇▇▇ sleeps. Indians rule., The American En- terprise, Sept. 2004 31 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Appellate Courts as First Re- sponders: The Constitutionality and Propriety of Appellate Courts’ Resolving Issues in the First Instance, 87 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1521 (2012) .......................................................................27 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, Second Treatise of Government 87 (R. ▇▇▇ ▇▇. 1982). 20
Sovereignty means to claim or exercise exclusive possession of territory, including exclusionary claims to in-situ resources, to navigation, or research