Issue 1 definition
Issue 1. Commitments to Tackle the Space Debris Problem One possible way to overcome the legal gap regarding the lack of a clear obligation to mitigate and remove debris is for those more forward-looking States to make commitments and lead international efforts to solve the space debris problem. As to the form of commitments, reference can be made to the GGE Report of 2013, which states that: “The Group endorses efforts to pursue political commitments, for example, in the form of unilateral declarations, bilateral commitments or a multilateral code of conduct, to encourage responsible actions in, and the peaceful use of, outer space. The Group concludes that voluntary political measures can form the basis for consideration of concepts and proposals for legally binding obligations.”1 In other words, political commitments can take a variety of forms, and these commitments may contribute to the further development of international law for the governance of space activities. Accordingly, States could make unilateral, multilateral and global commitments to address the space debris problem. These three forms of commitments will be discussed in Sections 5.1.1 to 5.1.3 below. Besides the State-oriented commitments addressed in 1 UN Doc. A/68/189 (29 July 2013). Report of the Group of Governmental Experts on Transparency and Confidence-Building Measures in Outer Space Activities, para. 69. these three sections, Section 5.1.4 will discuss the “Net Zero Space” initia- tive launched in November 2021 at the Paris Peace Forum which calls upon all stakeholders over the world, ranging from governmental agencies to private actors, to make commitments to debris mitigation and remediation.2
5.1.1 Unilateral Commitment to Debris Mitigation and Remediation At the unilateral level, States could issue unilateral statements to express their determination and commitment to mitigate and remove space debris. In fact, some States have explicitly expressed in their national space policies their political will to promote the development and implementation of ADR programs. For instance, the UK National Space Strategy states that the UK aims to “[l]ead the global effort to make space more sustainable”.3 More specifically, the UK “will explore advanced in-orbit debris removal, servicing, refuelling and assembly technologies, bringing together industry, academia, and government to ensure the UK is ready to grasp the opportunities of the future space economy”.4 With regard to the US, the Orbital Sus...
Issue 1. Height in sub-precinct A
Issue 1. The severability of the Consideration
Examples of Issue 1 in a sentence
TR-TSY-000191 Alarm Indication Signals Requirements and Objectives, Issue 1, May 1986.
Local Switching Bellcore FR-64-LATA, LATA Switching Systems Generic Requirements (“LSSGR”), 1996 Edition, Issue 1, January 1996.
Bellcore GR-1429-CORE, Common Channel Signaling Network Interface Specification (“CCSNIS”) Supporting Call Management Services, Issue 1, August 1994.
AIN Bellcore GR-1280-CORE, Advanced Intelligent Network (“AIN”) Service Control Point (“SCP”) Generic Requirements, Issue 1, August 1993.
Bellcore GR-303-CORE, Integrated Digital Loop Carrier System Generic Requirements, Objectives, and Interface, Issue 1, September 1995; and Revision 2, December 1996.
More Definitions of Issue 1
Issue 1. What is the appropriate language to implement the FCC’s transition plan for: (1) switching; (2) high-capacity loops; and (3) dedicated transport as detailed in the FCC’s TRRO, issued February 4, 2005?
Issue 1. Does the Commission have the statutory authority to grant FPL’s requested storm cost recovery mechanism as part of the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement?
Issue 1. The impact of the Competition Law on registered commercial agencies • UAE Federal Law No. 4 of 2012. • What is a restrictive agreement? • Is my registered commercial agency agreement a “restrictive agreement”? • One to watch: dealings between a registered commercial agent and its sub- distributors and customers.
Issue 1. What is the required standard of proof in the circumstances of a no case submission having been made without putting the Defendant to an election?
Issue 1. Did the Second Defendant provide adequate signage and sufficient warning to the Claimant to indicate that the floor of the corridor was wet and that it posed a risk to traverse thereon?
Issue 1. Did the trial judge err in awarding s. 24
Issue 1. What is the “matter” in respect of which this litigation has been brought?