Facts. This Declaration is made with reference to the following facts:
Facts means Flexible Alternating Current Transmission System;
Facts. Known" to a Corporation. Whenever a representation or warranty is made herein as being "to the best of knowledge," "to the knowledge of," or "known" to a party, it is understood and agreed that an individual will be deemed to have "knowledge" of a particular fact or other matter if: (a) such individual is actually aware of such fact or other matter; or (b) a prudent individual could be expected to discover or otherwise become aware of such fact or other matter in the course of conducting a reasonably comprehensive investigation concerning the existence of such fact or other matter. A party, person, or entity (other than an individual) will be deemed to have "knowledge" of a particular fact or other matter if any individual who is serving, or who has at any time served, as a director, officer, partner, executor, or trustee of such party, person, or entity (or in any similar capacity) has, or at any time had, knowledge of such fact or other matter.
Examples of Facts in a sentence
Examples of the interaction between the Act and existing law can be found in the Illinois Insurance Facts, Civil Unions and Insurance Benefits document available on the Illinois Department of Insurance’s website at www.insurance.illinois.gov.
These documents and the Fund Facts make up the fund’s legal documents.BMO Investments Inc.
Facts related to anti-doping rule violations may be established by any reliable means, including admissions.
Facts supporting the intervenor’s standing and qualifications for intervention.
These documents and the Fund Facts make up the fund’s legal documents.
More Definitions of Facts
Facts. 1999 Excess Amount is $100,000 and the Nasdaq Share Price for the 15 trading days period prior to the date upon which Telecom's audited financial statements are delivered to the buyer is $5.00.
Facts. Owner represents and warrants to Purchaser as follows:
Facts means all relevant facts (circumstances, acts and omissions) which relate to the pursuit or defence of a Proceeding relating to your legal rights.
Facts. All of the stock of a U.S. resident company is owned by a U.S. individual. The stock is worth 100x and the company pays a dividend each year of approximately 10x. The company has outstanding debt of l000x, all of which is held by three members of a single family, none of which is resident in the United States. The debt pays interest each year of 100x. Analysis: The U.S. company would not satisfy the requirements of subparagraph 1 f) of Article 22 of the Convention because the debt represents a predominant interest in the company, the ultimate beneficial owners of which are persons who are not residents of the United States Therefore, the U.S. company will be entitled to the benefits of the Convention only if it qualifies under some other provision of Article 22.
Facts. An individual who is not a resident of the United States owns 49% of the stock of a U.S. company that holds passive investments in other companies; the other 51% of the stock in the company is owned by several unrelated U.S. individuals. The non-resident individual also has a contract to provide investment advice to the company under which the individual is to receive l0x each year, regardless of the profits of the company. The company's gross profits are approximately 60x each year. Analysis: Whether the non-resident individual has a predominant interest in the U.S. company will depend on whether l0x is an arm's length remuneration for the services. If l0x is arm's length remuneration, then the payments are not taken into account for purposes of determining whether the individual has a predominant interest in the company. As a result, because U.S. individuals own a majority of the stock in the company, the company would qualify for benefits under Article 22, subparagraph 1 f). If the remuneration is not arm's length, then the non- resident individual would have a predominant interest in the company when the service payments are combined with his equity interest and the company would not be entitled to benefits under Article 22, subparagraph 1 f). Example III Facts: Assume the same facts as in Example II, except that the individual does not have an investment contract with the U.S. company and performs only nominal, if any, service. Nevertheless, each year the company sends the individual a check equal to 50% of the company's gross profits as a “bonus” for “services rendered”. Analysis: The U.S. company would not satisfy the requirements of subparagraph 1 f) of Article 22 of the Convention because the facts indicate that, even though the individual owns less than 50% of the stock of the company and does not have a contract to provide services, he in fact is the ultimate beneficial owner of a predominant interest in the company. Therefore, the U.S. company will be entitled to the benefits of the Convention only if it qualifies under some other provision of Article 22.
Facts section contained herein is true, correct, and complete in all material respects.
Facts means circumstances, events, and evidence pertaining to or touching upon the subject or matter(s) in question