Complete Settlement definition
Complete Settlement means an issue for which complete settlement was reached by all Parties, and if this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the Board, the Parties will not adduce any evidence or argument during the oral hearing in respect of these issues. # issues settled:All “Partial Settlement” means an issue for which there is partial settlement, as ENGLP and the Intervenors who take any position on the issue were able to agree on some, but not all, aspects of the particular issue. If this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the Board, the Parties who take any position on the issue will only adduce evidence and argument during the hearing on those portions of the issues not addressed in this Settlement Proposal. # issues partially settled:None “No Settlement” means an issue for which no settlement was reached. ENGLP and the Intervenors who take a position on the issue will adduce evidence and/or argument at the hearing on the issue. # issues not settled:None
Complete Settlement means an issue for which complete settlement was reached by all Parties, and if this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the OEB, none of the Parties (including Parties who take no position on that issue) will adduce any evidence or argument during the hearing (if any) in respect of thespecific issue.
Complete Settlement means an issue in respect of which Energy+ and the Intervenors who take a position on that issue, have agreed to a settlement of all aspects of the issue and if this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the Board, none of the Parties (including Parties who take no position on that issue) will adduce any evidence or argument during the oral hearing in respect of the specific issue. # issues settled:5 “Partial Settlement” means an issue in respect of which Energy+ and the Intervenors who take a position on that issue have agreed on some, but not all, aspects of that issue. If this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the Board, the Parties (including Parties who take no position on the Partial Settlement) will only adduce evidence and argument during the hearing on the portions of the issue for which no agreement has been reached. # issues partially settled:3 “No Settlement” means an issue in respect of which no settlement was reached. Energy+ and the Intervenors who take a position on the issue will adduce evidence and/or argument at the hearing on the issue. # issues not settled:6
Examples of Complete Settlement in a sentence
A/T1/pp.11-17 (Complete Settlement) The parties accept that the balance to be disposed of in the Gas Supply Review Consultant Cost Deferral Account (179-128) is a debit of $0.254 million.
A description of the status or resolution of that complaint, including any remedial action taken and the applicable dates is as follows: Date OF Claim Location Description of Claim Litigation (Y/N) Status Resolution/ Remedial Action Taken 2019 Cerritos, CA Age Discrimination No Complete Settlement Contractor Name: Golden Star Technology, Inc.
By signing this Amendment to Complete Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Amendment”), you are agreeing to completely release the Fidelity D&D Bancorp, Inc.
C1.8, C4.24, C5.14, C5.15, C5.16, C5.17, C39.39 [Complete Settlement] Union is proposing to modify the operation of the LRAM deferral account such that amounts approved for clearance are built into rates in the year following their initial accumulation.
By signing this Complete Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”), you are agreeing to completely release the Fidelity D&D Bancorp, Inc.
More Definitions of Complete Settlement
Complete Settlement means an issue for which complete settlement was reached by all Parties, and if this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the OEB, the Parties will not adduce any evidence or argument during the oral hearing in respect of these issues. # issues settled:
Complete Settlement. For the purposes of obtaining complete settlement of all issues with the exception of the three outstanding issues, the Parties accept to hold the Residential – R2 class at the current Board Approved amount for 2010 and 2011. Evidence: Exhibit 8, Tab 1, Schedule 2 Supporting parties: API, SEC, EP and VECC Parties taking no position: None. Opposing parties: None
Complete Settlement. For the purposes of obtaining complete settlement of all issues with the exception of the three outstanding issues, the Parties agree that the 2010 Cost Allocation Model will be revised such that the 2010 distributions of base revenue will reflect the 2010 Customer and Load Forecast and the 2007 Board Approved distribution rates, EB-2007-0744. Output Sheet O1 of that Cost Allocation Model is provided in Appendix “C” and the live version of the Cost Allocation Model accompanies this Settlement Agreement. Evidence: Exhibit 3, Tab 2, Schedule 1, Response to Board Staff Interrogatory No. 4. Supporting parties: API, SEC, EP and VECC Parties taking no position: None.
Complete Settlement means an issue for which complete settlement was reached by all Parties, and if this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the OEB, none of the Parties (including Parties who take no position on that issue) will adduce any evidence or argument during the hearing (if any) in respect of the specific issue. Issues Settled:Issues 1.1-1.2Issues 2.1-2.3Issues 3.1-8.1Issue 10.1 “Partial Settlement” means an issue for which there is partial settlement, as Toronto Hydro and the Intervenors who take any position on the issue were able to agree on some, but not all, aspects of the particular issue. If this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the OEB, the Parties (including Parties who take no position on the Partial Settlement) will only adduce evidence and argument during the hearing (if any) on the portions of the issue for which no agreement has been reached. Issues Partially Settled:Issue 1.3, 1.4, and 9.1, except as it relates to establishing an Innovation Fund related rate rider.Issue 10.2, except for establishing the Innovation Fund variance account “No Settlement” means an issue for which no settlement was reached. Toronto Hydro and the Intervenors who take a position on the issue will adduce evidence and/or argument at the hearing on the issue (if any). Issues Not Settled:Issue 2.4
Complete Settlement. For the purpose of obtaining a complete settlement with the exception of the three outstanding issues, the Parties accept Algoma's proposal to align its 2011 rate year with its January 1, 2011 fiscal year. Evidence: ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇. ▇▇ Supporting parties: API, SEC, EP and VECC Parties taking no position: None. Opposing parties: None
Complete Settlement. For the purpose of obtaining complete settlement of all issue with the exception of the three outstanding issues, the Parties agree with API’s proposed customer and load forecast. Evidence: Exhibit 3, Tab 2, Schedule 1. Supporting parties: API, SEC, EP and VECC Parties taking no position: None. Opposing parties: None
Complete Settlement. For the purpose of obtaining a complete settlement with the exception of the three outstanding issues, the Parties agree with API’s proposal to capitalize its overhead costs. API agrees to withdraw its request for an exemption from compliance with IFRS overhead capitalization rules, without prejudice to API’s right to seek such an exemption in the future by way of application to the Board, and without prejudice to the right of any party to take such position as they believe is appropriate in such proceeding. Evidence: Exhibit 2, Tab 4, Schedule 4. Supporting parties: API, SEC, EP and VECC Parties taking no position: None. Opposing parties: None