CNF definition

CNF means CNF Inc. and any successor to its business and/or assets.
CNF means a Claim Notification Form;
CNF means CNF Precision Engineering Limited, whose registered office is at Milton House, Gatehouse Way, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom, HP19 8EA;

Examples of CNF in a sentence

  • The User and his/her institution understand that his/her use of the laboratory facilities is controlled by the provisions of the PARADIM user program through which he/she has a project, and the separate user programs of CNF and CCMR and CHESS.

  • CNF instances are defined based on the maximum permitted data throughput and/or number of resources per CNF instance.

  • The Peer Companies are the following: Arkansas Best Corp., Central Freight Lines, Inc., Covenant Transport, Inc., CNF, Inc., Heartland Express, Inc., ▇.

  • The resources applicable to CNF instances may include, but not be limited to, virtual CPUs and will be set out in Sandvine’s quotation.

  • The address of the principal office of the Trust is c/o CNF Transportation Inc., ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇.


More Definitions of CNF

CNF. 856" N="2">
CNF means CN Financing, Inc., in its capacity as the Funding Lender and as the assignee and agent of the Governmental Lender with respect to the Borrower Loan pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
CNF. 877" N="12"> -12 - short-swing profits under Section 16 (b) if the warrants were exercised within six months of receipt. Even if held longer, the bank has potential liability for the abuse of insider information. It is entirely possible that the S.E.C. could, under Section 12 (b), exempt the issuer or any security holder from the disclosure requirements in any particular case. Nonetheless, the possibility of disclosure and insider responsibility is very real when a bank takes warrants with a loan.
CNF. 689" N="3"> -3 - a set of alternative approaches is presented. The research is limited in several ways and leaves room for extended treatment of issues raised herein. In particular, empirical analysis shows great promise, both on a systematic survey basis and on a case by case basis. Also, financial modeling of both the bank pricing process and the small firm capital structure decision in the presence of EPA would produce useful results. Finally, an intensive comparative analysis of the legal and regulatory boundaries facing banks with the limits of the ▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Act, while inevitably necessary, is beyond the scope of this paper. " " -- ~ '- - ----&mdash; ~ &mdash; -- * -`-c"""`"rr~~r &mdash;clr~-rurwrrr-r ---~l-~,,,,,-L"-*C~LLlr,IU-~*CI - --&mdash; r IWIUII-U~~~~-LI~I)~-~~~~*~ ---e-~HIIC ~E-i*I~MIUI-~.L~. II ~N f.3-U.II*I-~CC. </P> <P><PB REF="00000005.tif" SEQ="00000005" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="879" N="4"> III. Legal and Regulatory Considerations The use of equity participation agreements in bank lending operations raises a number of important questions.
CNF. 898" N=""> Division of Research January, 1981 Graduate School of Business Administration The University of Michigan EQUITY PARTICIPATION AGREEMENTS AND COMMERCIAL BANK LOANS TO SMALL BUSINESS FIRMS Working Paper No. 246 ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ The University of Michigan FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY None of this material is to be quoted or reproduced without the express permission of the Division of Research. </P> <P><PB REF="00000002.tif" SEQ="00000002" RES="600dpi" FMT="TIFF6.0" FTR="UNSPEC" CNF="890" N="1">
CNF. 869" N="31"> A major cause for concern in this case is the possibility that the ownermanager may depart from the accepted operating plan once the loan funds have been transferred. The banker has approved the loan and its price based on a certain level of perceived risk; by "changing the plans" the entrepreneur may increase the riskiness of the enterprise and the bank loan. The incentive for the entrepreneur to do this is based on the argument that by accepting projects with greater variance of expected returns, the possible return to the equity is higher. At the same time, of course, the greater variance increases the probability of bankruptcy. In the event of bankruptcy, the losses facing the corporate equity holder are limited to the value of the net worth. The lender,, in general, has no claim beyond the value of the assets of the corporate borrower. -The option pricing model has been applied to the capital structure problem and is useful in this context. It provides insight and a useful framework for valuing the equity and debt of a levered firm. To make this application, one must think of the equity of the firm as a call option against the firm's total value (the underlying assets). The writers of the option are the holders of the firm's debt. The exercise date is the maturity date of the debt and the exercise price is the maturity value of the debt. 3
CNF or“Containerized Network Function” means the Cisco Software listed in Table1 above, excluding Cisco SMI.