Case 2 definition
Case 2. A is a beneficiary in an action with a specific activity on ‘intelligent buildings’, where a Commission decision setting unit costs has been adopted in order to cover the costs of purchasing and operating (personnel + related indirect costs (overheads)) the equipment needed for the action. Case 3: A Commission decision allows for the use of a unit cost of 30 Euro for each laboratory analysis of the samples collected in an action. This is included in the GA under the option of article 5.2 (f). That unit cost covers the costs of the laboratory technicians involved in the analysis and of the equipment used. The beneficiary will declare the actual costs of the direct personnel working in the action under ‘direct personnel costs’, but excluding the costs of the laboratory technicians analysing the samples, because they are already covered by the unit cost under ‘specific category of costs’.
Case 2. ' (suspicion) means any case where, regardless of any exemption or threshold, in respect of any transaction, any person handling the transaction knows or suspects that the applicant for business may have been, is, or may be engaged in money laundering or the funding of terrorism, or that the transaction is carried out on behalf of another person who may have been, is, or may be engaged in money laundering or the funding of terrorism;
Case 2. Bob has the holiday off, and works a reduced schedule. He gets 38 hours pay (30 hours worked plus 8 hours holiday benefit time. If he wants his usual 40 hours pay, he has to use 2 hours of banked time. Case 3: Bob has the holiday off, but works a full schedule. He gets 40 hours straight time, and 8 hours at time and a half (because he didn't get a reduced schedule.) Purpose: To permit employees greater flexibility in work scheduling while ensuring all responsibilities are fulfilled. Policy:
Examples of Case 2 in a sentence
The cases without the SPS (Case 1) and with the SPS (Case 2) are described in Section 3.4.
The cases without the Project (Case 1) and with the Project (Case 2) are described in Section 3.4.
When the USD exchange rate is higher at the date of the transaction processing Case 2.
Case 2: the locks set of every correct process is empty at the end of phase ph − 1.
The goal of Use Case 2 is to provide customer resiliency during PSPS events and other planned grid outages.
More Definitions of Case 2
Case 2. The Erasmus Board highlights a partial match and, according to the suggestions received by the UNIBO professor teaching the selected learning activity, asks for an exam integration at UNIBO after the period abroad (i.e., a note is added to the LA)
Case 2 means any case where, in respect of any one-off transaction, any person handling the transaction knows or suspects that the applicant for business is engaged in money laundering or that the transaction is carried out on behalf of another person engaged in money laundering.
Case 2. The Company’s TSR is below the 25th percentile, earning a zero multiplier. Case 3: The Company’s achieves the highest TSR versus the Competitor Group, earning a 2.0 multiplier.
Case 2 means circumstances where an FCA-authorised person is the UK parent institution required by Chapter 2 of Title 2 of Part 1 of the capital requirements regulation to comply with requirements of the regulation on a consolidated basis, other than circumstances falling within Case 3;
Case 2. The firm receives a tax benefit from the state Similarly situated independent firms under the reference tax system (no tax benefit) Firm A is an independent firm receiving a tax benefit from the state Firm B is an MNE affiliate receiving a tax benefit from the state
Case 2. All the δθ = 1 (i.e. no eθ ∈ M ). Note that these two cases cover all possible situations, even when p = 2, since if δθ /∈ [0, 1] then all the rθ = 0 (see (2) of Lemma 7.1.2) which contradicts the irreducibility of T (M ) = T (f∗N ). Remark 7.2.2. Let M ∈ ModSD. In this section we will repeatedly use that • if m ∈ M then ϕ(m) ∈ M , • if m ∈ M is such that ϕ(m) ∈ up+1M then m ∈ uM . To see this note that if gri(Mk) = 0 for i < 0 then F 0Mk = F—1Mk = . . . = Mk and so F 0M = M , i.e. if m ∈ M then ϕ(m) ∈ M . If gri(Mk) = 0 for i > p then Fp+1Mk = Fp+2Mk = . . . = 0 and so Fp+1M ⊂ uM , i.e if ϕ(m) ∈ up+1M then m ∈ uM .
Case 2. For participanti(i ≤ k), they need to receive messages from participantj(j = mk + 1 + MODk(i 1)(m 1), j = i).