UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY Doc. 12August 25th, 2021
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASESettlement Agreement and Release • December 6th, 2006 • New York
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L SMay 21st, 2007
We note that plaintiff has purported to raise certain other minor arguments in his brief on appeal. We decline to address these matters, which were not included in plaintiff’s statement of the questions presented. MCR 7.212(C)(5); Caldwell v Chapman, 240 Mich App 124, 132; 610 NW2d 264 (2000).
ContractDecember 28th, 2012
) Honorable (Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, ) Neal Cerne and Inc., WMC Mortgage Corp., and Unknown ) Robert G. Gibson, Owners, Defendants). ) Judges, Presiding.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIAMarch 2nd, 2022
The County of Delaware (County) appeals from the December 28, 2020 final order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County (trial court), which was entered following a bench trial and disposed of all claims filed by the County and counterclaims filed by Delaware County Regional Water Quality Control Authority (DELCORA) and Aqua Pennsylvania Wastewater, Inc. (Aqua).
STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDERStipulated Confidentiality Agreement • March 17th, 2022
This Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order (the “Order”) is entered into by and between Plaintiff Selina Kyle (“Plaintiff” or “Kyle”) and Defendants Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht LLP (“Pierce Bainbridge”), Donald D. Lewis (“Lewis”) (collectively with Pierce Bainbridge, “Defendants”) (Plaintiff and Defendants, collectively, the “Parties” and each individually a “Party” to this Agreement). The Parties hereby stipulate and agree that discovery in the above-captioned civil action (the “Action”) will require production of documents and information that one or both of the Parties regards as containing sensitive and non-public business information, financial information, personnel information, personal information, trade secrets, and/or other confidential information. Disclosure of this information to the general public would be prejudicial to the Parties, and litigation over claims of confidentiality would unduly consume the resources and time of the Court and Part
AMENDMENT TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTCooperative Agreement • August 31st, 2009
This Amendment to Cooperative Agreement (the “Amendment”) is entered into by and between the Regents of the University of Michigan (“U of M”) and Google Inc. (“Google”). This Amendment is effective as of May 19, 2009 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), except as set forth herein.
CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc. Doc. 315 Att. 1Settlement Agreement and Release • March 17th, 2009
STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDERFebruary 21st, 2024
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 2/3/2022February 4th, 2022
WHEREAS, all of the parties to this action (collectively, the “Parties” and each individually, a “Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in this action;
ContractAugust 11th, 2016
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKAJoint Confidentiality • December 30th, 2014 • Delaware
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0001024 28-JUL-2015July 28th, 2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWAREDecember 14th, 2015
LESKO, DATED JUNE 4, 2003; AND § Court Below–Superior Court of 7835.1765 SQUARE FEET OF LAND § the State of Delaware, in and for (PERMANENT EASEMENT); AND § Sussex County
Syllabus of the CourtJuly 10th, 2009
{¶ 82} The tactics employed by Oakridge and countenanced by the majority in this case are appalling. This court today provides a roadmap for nursing-home facilities to avoid the responsibilities of the Ohio Nursing Home Patients’ Bill of Rights.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISIONAugust 22nd, 2013
WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs Debra L. Goettsche Bower and Linda F. Cassady (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendants MetLife, Inc. and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Inc. (collectively, the "Defendants") have entered into a Settlement Agreement intended to resolve the litigation pending in this Court; and
ORDERTrust Agreement • January 24th, 2023
Settlement agreement;April 23rd, 2010
William P. Rayel, Trial Attorney, Todd M. Hughes, Deputy Director, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANAFebruary 4th, 2022
Howard L. (“Howard”) and Elizabeth W. (“Elizabeth”) Chapman (collectively, “Trustees”), parents of Stephen L. Chapman (“Stephen”) and settlors of the Stephen L. Chapman Irrevocable Trust Agreement (“the Trust”) filed a petition to modify the date of distribution of Trust assets to Stephen, and the trial court granted the petition. Intervenor Carrie Chapman (“Carrie”), wife of Stephen, appeals the trial court‟s decision, raising the following two restated issues:
ContractCalifornia • December 16th, 2014
Nortek Inc. v. ITT LLC Doc. 56Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement • January 24th, 2023
H. A. BUIE, JR., AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF HUGH A. BUIE, SR., AND SUZANNE B. MACDONALD AND HUGH A. BUIE, JR. AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE HUGH A. BUIE, SR. FAMILY IRREVOCABLE TRUST, UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED JANUARY 19, 2000, Appellant,...August 7th, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKNon-Disclosure Agreement • March 2nd, 2024
AMENDED PROTECTIVE AGREEMENT AND ORDERJuly 15th, 2022
Upon joint motion by the parties and pursuant to the terms of the following Amended Protective Agreement (“Agreement”), the Court enters the following PROTECTIVE ORDER.
One tad Cafe miceito of tile Ma4nn 20 MOno ItaLy tFeeinauApril 30th, 2010
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0001024 17-MAY-2016May 16th, 2016
ContractJune 7th, 2011
SOFTWARE LICENSE AND ONLINE SERVICES AGREEMENTSoftware License and Online Services Agreement • June 18th, 2014 • California
This Agreement constitutes a legal agreement between you (“Transportation Company” or “You”) and Uber Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Uber” or “Vendor”).
SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENTSettlement and Release Agreement • May 5th, 2021 • Maine
STIPULATED ORDER - CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTStipulated Order - Confidentiality Agreement • April 17th, 2017
The parties have advised the Court that they anticipate discovery and production of documents which may be the proper subject of non-disclosure under FRCP 26(c)(1)(G). In order to assist in the timely completion of discovery, the Court enters this Order governing the procedure for seeking the protections under FRCP 26(c)(1)(G).
S11G1839. CITY OF ATLANTA v. CITY OF COLLEGE PARK et al.March 27th, 2013
The Cities of Atlanta and College Park entered into an agreement in 1969 (the “Agreement”) for purposes of expanding Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport (the “Airport”). One of the provisions of the Agreement granted Atlanta the exclusive right to collect and levy occupation taxes from businesses located at its Airport that were within the city limits of College Park. In 2007, after commissioning a study for the purpose of reassessing this relationship, College Park informed Atlanta and Airport businesses that it would no longer honor the 1969 Agreement and that it would now seek to collect occupation taxes from the Airport businesses including Atlanta’s proprietary business operations.
NO. COA06-80December 14th, 2007
The terms of an arbitration agreement were sufficiently definite to be enforceable under the normal rules of contract law, using the “gap-fillers” provided in the statutory framework of the Uniform Arbitration Act and the Federal Arbitration Act. The forum designated by the contract, North Dakota, is appropriate because the FAA preempts North Carolina’s public policy against arbitration in another state.
In re DARRELL V. WRIGHT TRUST AGREEMENT.March 16th, 2015
DONALD S. WRIGHT, PATRICIA WRIGHT, ROBIN WRIGHT, DONALD V. WRIGHT, SUZANNE M. WRIGHT, DARRELL E. WRIGHT, NATASHA R. WRIGHT, ANDREA WRIGHT, SHEILA S. ROBERTSON, JOHN D. ROBERTSON, SHAWN D. ROBERTSON, and KYLE J. ROBERTSON,
IN THE ESTATE OF GEORGE L. BRIGGS, ) DECEASED. )November 10th, 2014
AGR Celina Whinery v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al Doc. 32August 1st, 2011
