Work package descriptions Sample Clauses
The 'Work package descriptions' clause defines and outlines the specific tasks, deliverables, and responsibilities assigned within a project. It typically details the scope of work for each package, including timelines, required resources, and performance criteria, ensuring that all parties understand what is expected for each segment of the project. By providing clear and structured descriptions, this clause helps prevent misunderstandings, facilitates project management, and ensures accountability for each component of the work.
Work package descriptions. WP1 Project Management
D1.1 (MedUG, UNIMAN, IARC, LUMC, U.TURKU) Task 2: General project management. WP1 is responsible for the smooth interaction of all parts of the project and the assurance of the workflow. In particular, it is responsible for establishing and maintaining efficient communication between the individual bodies of the project and supervises the progress in the work packages according to their work plan.
Work package descriptions. WP1 – Outreach Workpackage number 1 Start date or starting event: Month 1
Work package descriptions. WP1 – Management Partner Ugdist sssa Unizh Uniup unife uniher Ist usfd epfl Tlr iit Objectives
1) Control of the scientific and technological development of the project.
2) Project’s self-assessment.
3) Internationalization and community building. The related activities will be managed by the Research Director and Technical Coordinator with the International Research Panel.
4) Coordination of training and dissemination.
5) Definition of the legal aspects of the licensing strategy.
6) Management of the Open Call activities, delivery of the Open Call robots.
1. Monthly assessment meetings of the project directorate primarily concerned with project management, open-system support and licensing, management of IPR, and formulation of occasional calls for expansion of the partner base.
2. Three-monthly meetings of the Board of Management mainly concerned with assessment of progress, cross-area integration, and scientific innovation.
3. Six-monthly workshops involving everyone directly involved in the project, from graduate students right through to the research director. These workshops will concentrate on relatively polished presentations of current results, assessment of scientific progress by external experts, and open ‘think-tank’ scientific exploration of new avenues of enquiry.
Work package descriptions. WP1 – Outreach Activity Type Coordination Participant id.r UGDIST UCD TUW HIS ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ AS CNRS MPI UKE Other Person-months per participant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 12
Work package descriptions. Work package number 1 Start date or starting event: 1 Work package title Management Activity Type Consortium management Participant number 1 Participant short name SED- ETHZ Person-months per participant: 36
Work package descriptions. Work package number 1 Start date or starting event: Month 1 Work package title Sensors and features Lead beneficiary 2 Activity Type12 RTD Participant id 1 2 3 4
Work package descriptions. Efforts for the full duration of the project
Work package descriptions. WP1 – Management Partner ugdist sssa Unizh uniup unife uniher Ist unisal epfl tlr ebri
Work package descriptions. In all Work Package description tables the available effort is recorded as follows: − person-months in bold are those funded through EC funds − person-months in normal type are provided as in-kind, auditable contributions − person-months in parentheses are provided as additional, contributions to the overall SKA design effort, of which PrepSKA is an integral part. These are therefore outside the framework of the present project. − Wherever associated participants listed in Table 2a contribute explicitly to any WPs, they are listed in brackets together with their (non auditable) contribution. Work package number 1 Start date or starting event: T+0 months Activity Type6 MGT Participant id 1 9 Person-months in bold are funded by the EC, those not in bold are in-kind resources To manage the PrepSKA project − To ensure that the appropriate management structure is in place; − To ensure that there is excellent communication and interaction between all relevant parties and work-packages, and particularly the various funding agencies; − To ensure that reporting is done according to an established procedure and schedule; − To ensure that the appropriate mechanisms for monitoring progress within work-packages are in place and that milestones and deadlines are achieved; − To distribute the EC and other financing in a timely manner, including the central administration of travel funds associated with all WPs; − Liaison with SPDO-CDIT Annual reports, mid-term review report and final report.
Work package descriptions. Work package 1 Start date or starting event: month 1 Objectives: WP1 will perform high quality nuclear data measurements on key isotopes and reactions selected from a list of identified priorities. This list of priorities resulted from recent nuclear data sensitivity studies for advanced reactor systems [4][5]. This work package has the ambition to achieve the lowest possible uncertainty for each type of measurement proposed, and to come as close as is reasonably achievable to the target uncertainties established in references [4][5]. WP1 follows closely the recommendations of the Coordination Action for Nuclear Data for Industrial Development in Europe, CANDIDE [6], that addressed how to meet these prioritized targets and additional important nuclear data issues. In this work package there are four major specific objectives subdivided in specific components which are reflected in the task, deliverables and milestones lists:
1. High accuracy measurements of neutron inelastic scattering cross sections.
2. High accuracy measurements of neutron total and capture cross sections.
3. High accuracy measurements of fission cross sections
4. State of the art decay data measurements for reactor kinetics and decay heat
1) Excellent for studies that have reported uncertainties that meet the target derived from sensitivity studies for advanced reactors (OECD report WPEC subgroup 26), 2) Very good for studies that report uncertainties of 5% or better or demonstrated methods of measurement that allow what is currently not feasible, 3) Good for significant advancement of uncertainties and methods over the state-of-the-art, 4) Satisfactory results that show a better understanding of measurements, qualifying the state-of-the-art and 5)