Wash all machine-washable bedding, drapes, and clothing, on the hottest water temperature and dry on the highest heat setting. Items that cannot be washed must be taken to a dry cleaner who MUST be informed of the issue. You must safely discard ALL items that cannot be decontaminated.
Wash up time permitted pursuant to clause 60.01 and immediately following and contiguous to the working day shall be deemed to qualify for overtime compensation for the purpose of clause 27.01.
Wash disinfect and wipe dry both sides of toilet seat using non-scented disinfectants.
Wash clean and disinfect water fountains and/or coolers. Give special attention to adjacent floor areas.
Wash and disinfect basins, urinals, and bowls using scouring powder to remove stains, making certain to clean undersides of rims of urinals and bowls.
Wash trade- the manipulator sells and repurchases the same or substantially the same security for the purpose of generating activity and increasing the price. This is more involved than churning because the orders are actually fulfilled.
Wash. All permanent shops or yards shall provide adequate wash up facilities.
Wash. It must include your name, address, telephone number and signature as well as the name and address of your lawyer, if one is appearing for you. Your objection and notice of intent to appear must be filed with the Court and sent no later than [objection deadline].
Wash ington May 8, 1871; entered into force June 17, 1871. 17 Stat. 863; TS 133; 12 Bevans 170. NOTES: 1 Only article 3 so far as it relates to the right of Indians to pass across the border, and articles 9 and 10 appear to remain in force. But see Akins v. U.S., 551 F.2d 1222 (1977). 2 Articles I-XVII and XXXIV-XLII have been executed; articles XVIII-XXV, XXX, and XXXII terminated July 1, 1885; articles XXVIII and XXIX not considered in force. TREATIES IN FORCE 39 CANADA (Cont’d) ARCTIC Agreement on Arctic cooperation. Signed at Ottawa January 11, 1988; entered into force January 11, 1988. TIAS 11565. ATOMIC ENERGY Agreement for cooperation on civil uses of atomic energy. Signed at Washington June 15, 1955; entered into force July 21, 1955. 6 UST 2595; TIAS 3304; 235 UNTS 175. Extension and amendments:1 June 26, 1956 (8 UST 275; TIAS 3771; 279 UNTS 318). June 11, 1960 (11 UST 1780; TIAS 4518; 377 UNTS 412). May 25, 1962 (13 UST 1400; TIAS 5102; 453 UNTS 362). June 23, 1999. Agreement for cooperation regarding atomic information for mutual defense purposes. Signed at Washington June 15, 1955; entered into force July 22, 1955. 6 UST 2607; TIAS 3305; 235 UNTS 201. Agreement for cooperation on uses of atomic energy for mutual defense purposes. Signed at Washington May 22, 1959; entered into force July 27, 1959. 10 UST 1293; TIAS 4271; 354 UNTS 63. Agreement regarding participation in the inter- national piping integrity research group. Signed at Ottawa and Bethesda April 28 and May 20, 1987; entered into force May 20, 1987. TIAS 12227. Agreement concerning cooperation on the ap- plication of non-proliferation assurances to Ca- nadian uranium to be transferred from Canada to the U.S. for enrichment and fabrication into fuel and retransferred to Taiwan for use in nu- clear reactors, with annex. Exchange of letters at Washington February 24 and March 5, 1993; entered into force March 5, 1993. TIAS 12490; 1914 UNTS 209. Administrative arrangement for cooperation and the exchange of information in nuclear regulatory matters, with appendices. Signed at Ottawa August 15, 1996; entered into force August 15, 1996. TIAS NOTE: 1 See also agreement of May 22, 1959 for cooperation on uses of atomic energy for mu- tual defense purposes (10 UST 1293; TIAS 4271).
Wash. 2002). In addition, as affirmed in State of Louisiana x. Xxxxxx, 853 F.2d 322 (5th Cir. 1988), the rule need not address all the threats to the species. As noted by Congress when the ESA was initially enacted, ‘‘once an animal is on the threatened list, the Secretary has an almost infinite number of options available to him with regard to the permitted activities for those species. He may, for example, permit taking, but not importation of such species, or he may choose to forbid both taking and importation but allow the transportation of such species,’’ as long as the measures will ‘‘serve to conserve, protect, or restore the species concerned in accordance with the purposes of the Act’’ (H.R. Rep. No. 412, 93rd Cong., 1st Sess. 1973). Alternative 2 (this proposed 4(d) special rule) provides the appropriate prohibitions, and exceptions to those prohibitions, to provide for the conservation of the species. Many provisions provided under the MMPA and CITES are comparable to or stricter than similar provisions under the ESA, including the definitions of take, penalties for violations, and use of marine mammals. As an example, concerning the definitions of harm under the ESA and harassment under the MMPA, while the terminology of the definitions is not identical, we cannot foresee circumstances under which the management for polar bears under the two definitions would differ. In addition, the existing statutory exceptions that allow use of marine mammals under the MMPA (e.g., research, public display) allow fewer types of activities than does the ESA regulation at 50 CFR 17.32 for threatened species, and the MMPA’s standards are generally stricter for those activities that are allowed than those standards for comparable activities under the ESA regulations at 50 CFR
