Test and Evaluation a. The Contractor shall provide the Authority’s Representative (Project – see Box 2 of Schedule 3 Annex A to the Contract – DEFFORM 111) with all appropriate paperwork, to the requirements of the Authority’s Representative to support conduct of test and evaluation; including but not limited to:
Test and Evaluation. 5.14.1 The Contractor shall provide services to test, evaluate, and qualify parts and assemblies. The Contractor shall also evaluate parts and assemblies prior to delivery of ORDALT Kits and INCO Spares or concurrent with installation at sites or aboard ships to ensure that delivered items meet all requirements for installation as specified in Systems Requirement Document (SRD). Tests include: Functional Bench Testing, First Article Testing, Environmental Qualification Testing (EQT), Integration Testing, Software Compatibility Testing, and any necessary regression testing. The Contractor shall submit test reports in accordance with CDRLs: A017, A018, A019, and A020.
Test and Evaluation. The transfer selection component is tested by determining the transfer of a test lemma in a given sentence context, and comparing it with the one of a reference translation. In the best case, all translations proposed by the Lt-Xfr component are identical with the transfers selected in the reference translations. As the LinguaDict lexicon contains many near translations, which can hardly be distinguished on the basis of conceptual transfer, a special evaluation procedure was adopted, consisting of three ranks instead of a binary decision: Rank 1: the translation proposed by the system is identical to the one in the test reference sentence Rank 2: the proposed translation close / synonym to the one in the test reference sentence. This was decided to be the case if o the proposed translation belongs to the same WordNet synset as the reference o the proposed translation is orthographically similar to the reference (like: ‘electric’ vs. ‘electrical’, ‘agglutinating’ vs. ‚agglutinative‘, ‘dialogue’ (UK) vs. ‘dialog’ (US) etc. Rank 3: the two translations are (still) different. Evaluation would allow rank1 and rank2, and reject rank3 results. Based on the three ranks, a simple scoring system is used (rank1 = 1, rank2 = 2, rank3 = 3) to compute an overall score: The lower the score the closer the translation is to the reference.
Test and Evaluation. The Contractor shall provide the Authority with all appropriate paperwork, to the requirements and acceptance of the Dstl Demand Owner to support conduct of test and evaluation; including but not limited to:
Test and Evaluation. The contractor shall provide initial testing and evaluation, not the USPTO ITPA testing, of the ECC system to verify compliance of the system functionality prior to delivery to the USPTO. The contractor shall conduct full ECC platform test, including but not limited to: routing plan tests, voice application functionality tests, screen pop data validation tests, and call volume load tests. The following describes typical functions associated with test and evaluation.
Test and Evaluation. The Contractor shall provide support for test planning, performance, data analysis, and documentation for
Test and Evaluation. The HFV Class of Therapeutics will be developed in full accordance with FDA regulations and guidelines established by CFR 21, the Pure Food and Drug Act. The FDA mandates test and evaluation processes that follow a series of phases that establish the effectiveness and safety of new drugs. The FDA issues extensive mandatory guidance and requires submission of substantive evidence for FDA review. Only after FDA approval can work proceed from one phase to the next. The FDA process is mandatory for licensure. The Government will utilize the Contractor’s validated information and FDA process documentation in evaluating progress and conformance with TPP Guidelines.
Test and Evaluation. 5.6.1 The Contractor shall provide services to test, evaluate, and qualify assemblies. The Contractor shall also evaluate assemblies prior to delivery of TI-12H ORDALT Kits and INCO Spares or concurrent with installation at sites or aboard ships to ensure that delivered items meet all requirements for installation as specified in SRD. Tests include: Functional Bench Testing, First Article Testing, Environmental Qualification Testing, Integration Testing, Software Compatibility Testing, and any necessary regression testing. The Contractor shall provide test plans and test reports.
Test and Evaluation. If, after visual and functional inspections, an item is found to meet manufacturer's minimum performance specifications, the contractor will be allowed the firm fixed price for test and evaluation. The Failure Data Report shall be prepared, indicating the Coast Guard's reported failure, and included with the returned component, as well as with the invoice.
Test and Evaluation. The Contractor shall develop a GIMDE 2K Test Plan (TP), which shall govern all test and evaluation activities. The Contractor shall verify by means of the TP that all requirements of GIMDE 2K defined within the scope of this SOW have been met or exceeded. The TP shall detail test procedures and test scenarios to be followed as part of the evaluation process for each software deliverable defined with the scope of this SOW. The TP shall also include a detailed schedule as to the timing of all test and evaluation activities defined in the TP consistent with the PMS. The TP shall encompass all factory acceptance-testing activities. Factory acceptance testing as defined within this SOW includes: unit testing of each software deliverable defined within the scope of this SOW; subsystem testing both with respect to the software deliverables defined with the scope of this SOW, the Management Data Library (MDL) Information Access Services (IAS) and the GPT. The Contractor shall document instances in which test procedures fail to provide proof that a GIMDE 2K requirement(s) has been met in the form of a Discrepancy Report (DR). The Contractor shall repeat both unit and subsystem level testing if changes are made to a software deliverable after unit level tests on that software deliverable has been completed. The Contractor shall conduct unit and subsystem level testing consistent with GIMDE 2K PMS. The Contractor shall not be responsible for testing at the unit level, COTS software deliverables that have not been modified as the result of this acquisition. The Contractor shall perform all test and evaluation activities identified in the TP at the Contractors facility. The Contractor's test environment shall support or simulate a complete site configuration. In addition the Contractor shall document instances in which individual test procedures result in the system not performing as anticipated, but not associated with a requirement in the form of a Discrepancy Report (DR). The Contractor shall conduct Test Readiness Reviews and incorporate them into the TP as negotiated with the Government. The Contractor shall ensure software deliverables, which have passed factory acceptance testing as defined by this SOW, are delivered to the Reston NIMA Production Facility (NPF) consistent with the PMS. (CDRL A-013, Test Plan) (CDRL A-014, Discrepancy Report)
