Table 2b. 2021 HEPPP reporting requirements Report Description Due date Notice of unspent 2020 HEPPP funds Request for rollover of unspent 2020 HEPPP grant amounts into 2021* 1 March 2021 2021 HEPPP Activities Plan An overview of all planned HEPPP-funded activities for 2021, including planned expenditure of any unspent 2020 HEPPP funds requested for rollover. 1 March 2021 2020 HEPPP Activities Report A report on all HEPPP-funded activities undertaken in 2020, including expenditure. 31 May 2021
Table 2b. Weighted Average Life of Hedge in Years __________________________________ 1 or less 6.10% More than 1 but not more than 2 6.30% More than 2 but not more than 3 6.40% More than 3 but not more than 4 6.60% More than 4 but not more than 5 6.70% More than 5 but not more than 6 6.80% More than 6 but not more than 7 7.00% More than 7 but not more than 8 7.10% More than 8 but not more than 9 7.20% More than 9 but not more than 10 7.30% More than 10 but not more than 11 7.40% More than 11 but not more than 12 7.50% More than 12 but not more than 13 7.60% More than 13 but not more than 14 7.70% More than 14 but not more than 15 7.80% More than 15 but not more than 16 7.90% More than 16 but not more than 17 8.00% More than 17 but not more than 18 8.10% More than 18 but not more than 19 8.20% More than 19 but not more than 20 8.20% More than 20 but not more than 21 8.30% More than 21 but not more than 22 8.40% More than 22 but not more than 23 8.50% More than 23 but not more than 24 8.60% More than 24 but not more than 25 8.60% More than 25 but not more than 26 8.70% More than 26 but not more than 27 8.80% More than 27 but not more than 28 8.80% More than 28 but not more than 29 8.90% More than 29 but not more than 30 9.00%
Table 2b. Weighted Average Life of Hedge in Years _________________________________ 1 or less 6.10% More than 1 but not more than 2 6.30% More than 2 but not more than 3 6.40% More than 3 but not more than 4 6.60% More than 4 but not more than 5 6.70% More than 5 but not more than 6 6.80% More than 6 but not more than 7 7.00% More than 7 but not more than 8 7.10% More than 8 but not more than 9 7.20% More than 9 but not more than 10 7.30% More than 10 but not more than 11 7.40% More than 11 but not more than 12 7.50% More than 12 but not more than 13 7.60% More than 13 but not more than 14 7.70% More than 14 but not more than 15 7.80% More than 15 but not more than 16 7.90% More than 16 but not more than 17 8.00% More than 17 but not more than 18 8.10% More than 18 but not more than 19 8.20% More than 19 but not more than 20 8.20% More than 20 but not more than 21 8.30% More than 21 but not more than 22 8.40% More than 22 but not more than 23 8.50% More than 23 but not more than 24 8.60% More than 24 but not more than 25 8.60% More than 25 but not more than 26 8.70% More than 26 but not more than 27 8.80% More than 27 but not more than 28 8.80% More than 28 but not more than 29 8.90% More than 29 but not more than 30 9.00% TABLE 2B SERIES 1 CLASS B From: Credit Suisse (USA), Inc. To: Permanent Master Issuer PLC 35 Great St. Helen's London EC3A 0XX Xxxxxxxxx: Xxx Xxxxxxxxx Xx: Xxx Xxxx xx Xxx York One Canada Square Xxxxxx X00 0XX Xxxxxxxxx: Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx - Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx 1 March, 2007 Dear Sirs, CONFIRMATION - SERIES 1 CLASS B DOLLAR TO STERLING CURRENCY SWAP The purpose of this letter is to confirm the terms and conditions of the Swap Transaction entered into between us on the Trade Date specified below. This letter constitutes a "CONFIRMATION" as referred to in the 1992 ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border) (Series 1 Class B) entered into between us, you and The Bank of New York (the "SECURITY TRUSTEE") dated as of 21 February, 2007, as amended and supplemented from time to time (the "AGREEMENT"). The definitions and provisions contained in the 2000 ISDA Definitions as published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (the "DEFINITIONS") are incorporated into this Confirmation. Words and expressions defined in the Amended and Restated Master Definitions and Construction Schedule (the "MASTER SCHEDULE") and the Master Issuer Master Definitions and Construction Schedule (the "MASTER ISSUER SCHEDULE") (together the "MASTE...
Table 2b. Weighted Average Life of Hedge in Years -------- 1 0.25% 2 0.50% 3 0.70% 4 1.00% 5 1.20% 6 1.40% 7 1.60% 8 1.80% 9 2.00% 10 2.20% 11 2.30% 12 2.50% 13 2.70% 14 2.80% 15 3.00% 16 3.20% 17 3.30% 18 3.50% 19 3.60% 20 3.70% 21 3.90% 22 4.00% 23 4.00% 24 4.00% 25 4.00% 26 4.00% 27 4.00% 28 4.00% 29 4.00% 30 4.00% TABLE 3A CREDIT SUPPORT AMOUNT DOWNGRADE BY MOODY'S BELOW MOODY'S SECOND TIER REQUIRED XXXX XXUNTERPAXXX XXXING
Table 2b. Covered and No-Take Plant Species, Typical Habitat Conditions, and Typical Blooming Periods Land Cover Covered Type in the (C) or Typical project No-Take Typical Habitat or Physical Blooming area? Plant Species (N)? Conditions, if Known Perioda Oak Diablo Helianthella C Elevation above 650 feetb Mar–Jun savanna (Helianthella castanea) Mount Diablo fairy- lantern (Calochortus C Elevation between 650 and 2,600 feetb Apr–Jun pulchellus) Oak Xxxxxx’x dwarf flax C May–Jul woodland (Hesperolinon breweri) Diablo Helianthella C Elevation above 650 feetb Mar–Jun (Helianthella castanea) Mount Diablo fairy- lantern (Calochortus C Elevation between 650 and 2,600 feetb Apr–Jun pulchellus) Showy xxxxx (Xxxxx C Mar–May radiata) Xxxxxx’x dwarf flax C May–Jul Chaparral (Hesperolinon breweri) and scrub Diablo Helianthella C Elevation above 650 feetb Mar–Jun (Helianthella castanea) Mount Diablo N Apr–Sep; buckwheat (Eriogonum uncommonl truncatum) y Nov–Dec. Mount Diablo fairy- lantern (Calochortus C Elevation between 650 and 2,600 feetb Apr–Jun pulchellus) Land Cover Type in the project area? Plant Species Covered (C) or No-Take (N)? Typical Habitat or Physical Conditions, if Known Typical Blooming Perioda Mount Diablo C Elevation between 700 and Jan–Mar Manzanita 1,860 feet; restricted to the (Arctostaphylos auriculata) eastern and northern flanks of Mt. Diablob Alkali Brittlescale (Atriplex C Restricted to soils of the May–Oct grassland depressa) Pescadero or Xxxxxx soil series; generally found in southeastern region of plan areab Caper-fruited N Mar-Apr tropidocarpum (Tropidocarpum capparideum) Contra Costa goldfields N Generally found in vernal Mar–Jun (Lasthenia conjugens) pools Recurved larkspur C Mar–Jun (Delphinium recurvatum) San Xxxxxxx C Apr-Oct spearscale (Atriplex joaquiniana) Alkali Alkali milkvetch N Mar–Jun wetland (Astragalus tener ssp. tener) Brittlescale (Atriplex C Restricted to soils of the May–Oct depressa) Pescadero or Xxxxxx soil series; generally found in southeastern region of plan areab San Xxxxxxx C Apr–Oct spearscale (Atriplex joaquiniana) Annual Alkali milkvetch N Mar–Jun grassland (Astragalus tener ssp. tener) Big tarplant C Elevation below 1500 feetb Jul–Oct (Blepharizonia plumosa) Xxxxxx’x dwarf flax C Restricted to grassland May–Jul (Hesperolinon breweri) areas within a 500+ buffer from oak woodland and chaparral/scrubb Contra Costa goldfields N Generally found in vernal Mar–Jun (Lasthenia conjugens) pools Land Cover Covered Type in the (C) ...
Table 2b. 2.6 Sensitivity Assessment SEE NOTE on page 26 Ecosystem components*1 Human pressures*2 *1 from the completed table 2a.1.2
Table 2b. Binary Logistic Regression for the Association Between Psychological Distress and Up to Date Mammography Use in a Gender and Age-‐Eligible Population Based Sample (n=1,398) Characteristics Adjusted OR 95% CI ExposurePsychological Distress Any 1.00 None 1.21 0.75, 1.97 Social Support Emotional Support No 1.00 Yes 1.30 0.66, 2.54 Informational Support No 1.00 Yes 1.06 0.44, 2.60 Self Efficacy Self efficacy in ability to take care of own health No 1.00 Yes 1.31 0.75, 2.29 Self efficacy in getting advice or information about cancer No 1.00 Yes 1.31 0.83, 2.07 Health Related Regular Healthcare Provider No 1.00 Yes *1.99 1.26, 3.15 Healthcare Insurance No 1.00 Yes *2.39 1.26, 4.53 Self Rating of Health Very good or excellent *1.82 1.14, 2.91 Good, fair, or poor 1.00 Comorbidities (cont.) *1.25 1.02, 1.54 Note. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval *p<0.05
Table 2b. Binary Logistic Regression for the Association Between Psychological Distress and Up to Date Mammography Use in a Gender and Age-‐Eligible Population Based Sample (n=1,398), continued Characteristics Adjusted OR 95% CI Demographics Age (cont.) 1.00 0.97, 1.02 Race/Ethnicity Non Hispanic White 1.00 Hispanic 1.32 0.77, 2.25 Non Hispanic Black 1.53 0.87, 2.67 Non Hispanic Other 1.85 0.30, 11.57 Education Less than High School 1.00 High School Graduate 0.57 0.23, 1.40 Some College 0.56 0.21, 1.52 College Graduate or More 0.50 0.20, 1.29 Household Income Less than $20,000 1.00 $20,000 to <$50,000 0.66 0.31, 1.43 $50,000 to <$75,000 1.23 0.47, 3.24 $75,000 or More 1.34 0.54, 3.28 Occupation Employed 1.00 Unemployed 1.55 0.65, 5.17 Other (retired, disabled, homemaker, student, other) 1.12 0.66, 1.89 Marital Status Single, never married 1.00 Married or living as married 1.25 0.47, 3.28 Divorced or Separated 0.76 0.30, 1.90 Widowed 0.54 0.15, 1.93 Note. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval *p<0.05 Chapter III Summary The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent association between psychological distress and cancer screening behavior. It was one of few studies conducted using a nationally representative sample. We also wanted to determine if there was an interaction between psychological distress and social support that played a role in cancer screening behavior. This was the first study, to our knowledge, to assess the influence of social support in this manner. In this study, psychological distress was not associated with colorectal cancer screening use or being up to date with mammography screening. Also, the association between psychological distress and cancer screening was not moderated by emotional or informational support. Based on previous significant findings within specific populations, it is possible that the association between mental health symptoms and cancer screening may only be present in particular groups of people. Future research should further stratify populations to identify subgroups where mental health symptoms may be an important determinant of cancer screening. Public Health Implications Cancer remains the second leading cause of death in the United States. It is estimated that 589,430 people will be die of cancer in 2015, including 40,290 from female breast cancer and 49,700 from colorectal cancer (1). One strongly encouraged method of reducing cancer mortality is to increase earlier detection of cancer via screening. Man...
Table 2b. Importance of requirements for usability of stroke e-rehabilitation according to end users (n=273). Category Requirement End user Patients (n=125) Mean (SD) Caregivers (n=43) Mean (SD) Professionals (n=105) Mean (SD) The mean score of all statements per subgroup 2.9 3.4 3.5
Table 2b. Allocation of Commonwealth supported places for 20221 Non-Grandfathered Load Allocations: Cluster No. Funding cluster Undergraduate Allocation Non-research Postgraduate Allocation Total Allocation 3 Nursing, Indigenous and Foreign Languages, Engineering, Surveying, Environmental Studies, Science 125.0 0.0 125.0 4 Agriculture, Medicine, Dentistry, Veterinary Science, Pathology 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 264.3 0.0 264.3
