Substantial Compliance Sample Clauses
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 3 times
Substantial Compliance. Supplier warrants that the Software provided under this Agreement substantially complies with the representations made by Supplier when demonstrating the Software. THIS PROVISION CONSTITUTES SUPPLIER'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE LIABILITY AND CUSTOMER'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR DEFECTIVE OR NON-CONFORMING SOFTWARE AND IS IN LIEU OF ANY OTHER WARRANTY, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY INCLUDING THE WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Substantial Compliance. Notwithstanding the specific requirements under section
Substantial Compliance. Noncompliance with mere technicalities, or temporary failure to comply during a period of otherwise sustained compliance will not constitute failure to maintain substantial compliance. At the same time, temporary compliance during a period of sustained noncompliance shall not constitute substantial compliance.
Substantial Compliance. Any administrative practice adopted, implemented, changed or discontinued by the Trustee or Paying Agent in order to accommodate administrative practices or processes (including systems limitations) will be considered to be consistent with this Trust Agreement and expectations of a reasonable investor in mortgage-backed securities if such practice achieves substantial compliance in all material respects with this Trust Agreement.
Substantial Compliance. Any servicing or administrative practice adopted, implemented, changed or discontinued by the Direct Servicer, Master Servicer, Trustee or Paying Agent in order to accommodate servicing or administrative practices or processes (including systems limitations) will be considered to be consistent with this Trust Agreement and expectations of a reasonable investor in mortgage-backed securities if such practice achieves substantial compliance in all material respects with this Trust Agreement.
Substantial Compliance. The Contractor shall promptly collect all materials disposed of by the customer, provided the materials are prepared and placed within substantial compliance with the guidelines as set forth herein. Any dispute as to the standards of substantial compliance shall be determined by the Contract Administrator or his designee.
Substantial Compliance. Compliance which the Party for whose benefit or at whose request an act is performed, or for whose benefit or at whose request an act is refrained from, could under the circumstances be reasonably expected to accept as full compliance.
Substantial Compliance. Paragraph 115 requires the City to ensure that Crisis Triage is fully operational, including the implementation of policies and procedures developed by the Bureau of Emergency Communications (BOEC) and the Portland Police Bureau (PPB). The policies and procedures developed by BOEC and PPB triage calls related to mental health issues and assign them for handling by PPB, the Multnomah County Crisis Line (MCCL), or the City’s Portland Street Response (PSR). To assess compliance with this paragraph, the Monitoring Team: 1) reviewed relevant BOEC policies for the Crisis Triage System; 2) reviewed the results of BOEC's internal audit of dispatch calls; and 3) performed additional review of a random sample of 20 calls dispatched to each of four sets of responders: PSR, Enhanced Crisis Intervention Team (ECIT), MCCL, and non-ECIT PPB. The Monitoring Team's review confirmed that BOEC is dispatching incoming calls in accordance with its policies regarding the appropriate use of the City's Crisis Triage System. BOEC’s internal audit assesses the subset of 9-1-1 emergency calls for which responding officers documented in the Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) system that there was a mental health component, and a PPB ECIT was not dispatched. The purpose of BOEC’s audit is to determine whether any of these calls should have been dispatched to ECIT. There were 9,180 calls received by BOEC during the Reporting Period meeting these review criteria. BOEC audited a random sample of 689 of those calls, finding that 36 of them (5.2 percent of the sample) met the criteria for dispatching ECIT but did not reflect a change in the call type to indicate ECIT response. BOEC also reported transferring 411 calls to MCCL, with 13 calls (3.2 percent) returned to BOEC for ECIT dispatch. This finding does not indicate fault with the BOEC call-takers, as MCCL staff may learn new information after the transfer requiring an ECIT response. Additionally, BOEC reports transferring 7,463 calls to PSR during the Reporting Period. The Monitoring Team talked with BOEC staff about the lessons learned during their audits of dispatch calls. BOEC reported that any results suggesting systematic issues in call-taker or dispatcher performance were fed back into their training system for remediation. Additionally, BOEC reported that in the coming months staff members will receive direct feedback on their individual performances from call audits. BOEC provided the Monitoring Team with the dispatch call audio an...
Substantial Compliance. “Substantial Compliance” with each and every substantive provision of this Agreement, as defined in Section III.J, for a period of one year shall fully satisfy the Agreement. Noncompliance with mere technicalities, or temporary failure to comply during a period of otherwise sustained compliance, shall not constitute failure to maintain substantial compliance. At the same time, temporary compliance during a period of otherwise sustained noncompliance shall not constitute substantial compliance. For purposes of Sections III.Q and R, a Facility has achieved substantial compliance with a substantive provision when that provision has been implemented for the individuals residing, or placed from, that Facility.
Substantial Compliance. Notwithstanding the specific requirements under section 10.7 of this Agreement, the City acknowledges that Lessor’s nondiscrimination policies substantially comply with the City’s requirements and are in conformance therewith.
