Struct Clause Samples
The "Struct" clause defines the organizational framework or structure of a contract or agreement. It typically outlines how the document is arranged, such as the division into sections, articles, or schedules, and may specify the hierarchy or relationship between different parts. For example, it might clarify that schedules attached to the contract are considered integral parts of the agreement. This clause ensures clarity and consistency in interpreting the contract by establishing how its various components fit together and which provisions take precedence in case of conflict.
Struct. Biol. 12, 775−782.
Struct. LEVEL 1 0 -2 EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE, TYP. 37'-1 7/8" 22'-4 5/8" 59'-6 1/2" 42" GUARDRAIL, TYP. t.o. ROOF 9 u.s. STRUCT. ROOF 6 t.o. STRUCT. LEVEL 2 3 8'-0" t.o. STRUCT. LEVEL 1 0 74' - 7" 3' - 6" TYP. WINDOR TYPE W1 24"×48" WITH 4" PVC TRIM 42" GUARDRAIL, TYP. METAL ROOFING VINYL SIDING TYPE 1, TYP. VINYL SIDING TYPE 2, TYP. 1×6 PVC CORNER BOARD North Elevation 1 : 192 West Elevation 1 : 192 t.o. ROOF 9 t.o. ROOF 9 METAL ROOFING u.s. STRUCT. ROOF 6 t.o. STRUCT. LEVEL 2 3 t.o. STRUCT. LEVEL 1 0 FOUNDATION East Elevation 1 : 192 1'-6" TYP. 8'-0" 12 4 WINDOW TYPE W1 24"×48" WITH 4" PVC TRIM u.s. STRUCT. ROOF 6 t.o. STRUCT. LEVEL 2 3 t.o. STRUCT. LEVEL 1 0 FOUNDATION South Elevation 1 : 192 -2 CEMENT BOARD SIDING, TYP. WINDOW TYPE W1 24" × 48" WITH 4" PVC TRIM Project: Subject: ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ 5 15 SEP 2022 Issued for meeting with HRM Issued for DA Issued for DA Issued for DA Date: Scale: Drawn: Client Project No. JAL Project No. 3202 26 JAN 2023 02 DEC 2022 14 OCT 2022 Elevations
Struct. Steel Joists/Decks 5.)
Struct. LEVEL 2 3 1'-6" TYP. EAVESTROUGH AND DOWNSPOUT, TYP.
Struct in Comp. Science (2017), vol. 27, pp. 1236–1264. ×c Cambridge University Press 2015 doi:10.1017/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ First published online 9 December 2015 Enhanced coalgebraic bisimulation ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇†, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇‡, M ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ E§,¶, DAMIEN P OU S‡, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ N¶,∗ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ S ILV A†† †Universit´e ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, CNRS, ENS ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, UCBL, LIP, 46 All´ee d’Italie, 69364 Lyon, France Email: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇@▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇.▇▇ ‡CNRS, Plume team, LIP (UMR 5668, ENS ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, UCBL, Universit´e ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇), 46 All´ee §LIACS - Leiden University, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Email: ▇.▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ ¶Centrum Wiskunde en Informatica (CWI), Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The ∗Radboud University Nijmegen, Toernooiveld ▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ††University College London, ▇▇▇▇▇ Street, London WC1E 6BT, U.K. We present a systematic study of bisimulation-up-to techniques for coalgebras. This enhances the bisimulation proof method for a large class of state based systems, including labelled transition systems but also stream systems and weighted automata. Our approach allows for compositional reasoning about the soundness of enhancements. Applications include the soundness of bisimulation up to bisimilarity, up to equivalence and up to congruence. All in all, this gives a powerful and modular framework for simplified coinductive proofs of equivalence.
Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1273–1281 (2012).
Struct. Biol. 2017, 44, 1–8. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇/10.1016/j.sbi.2016.10.009.
Struct. 33, 415–440 (2004).
Struct. 13 1131–1142.
Struct. 2001, 30, 1.