Project Structure Clause Samples
The Project Structure clause defines the organizational framework and key components of a project as agreed upon by the parties. It typically outlines the roles and responsibilities of each party, the reporting hierarchy, and the main phases or deliverables of the project. By clearly establishing how the project will be managed and who is responsible for what, this clause ensures effective coordination and minimizes misunderstandings throughout the project's execution.
Project Structure. Section 6.1: Context
Figure.1: Following the trend of Progressive Civil Aviation Reform
Project Structure. Vendor will use a comprehensive project plan with tasks, estimated work effort by task, critical path relationships among tasks, start and finish dates, and related deliverables. The project resource view will show the assigned person for each task. The project structure will show the relationship of the team members to accomplish the County’s overall mission. Vendor has selected ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, a highly qualified and experienced Project Manager, to manage this project. ▇▇▇ will be supported by two outstanding technical leaders also named as Key Personnel – ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ as Vendor’s Lead Architect, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Kolhapure as Vendor’s Testing Lead – based on their relevant experience and qualifications for this project. Vendor provide full resumes for these critical resources in Table 12 summarizes their key qualifications and experience.
Project Structure. In order to realize the main goal and the related sub-goals of OSCAR, it is necessary to have (1) detailed understanding of the level of awareness and acceptance of open science in AAT research,
Project Structure. The Parties will jointly agree on a suitable structure for the PV Systems at each Facility which incorporates reasonable tax-efficiency, suitable risk management and appropriate governance to the financial benefit of both Parties.
Project Structure. In order to realize the main goal and the related sub-goals, ▇▇▇▇▇ will achieve the following Objec- tives and measurable results: Achieving the main goal of OSCAR requires (1) detailed understanding of knowledge and acceptance of Open Science in AAT research, (2) development of adapted imple- mentation approaches and (3) their validation. While these three objectives provide tools and prac- tical information to implement Open Science in AAT research projects it is also necessary to raise the motivation to implement Open Science within the AAT research community. Objective (4) ad- dresses the latter. Objective 1 à WP2, WP3: An assessment of the development of Open Science in European AAT projects since the beginning of FP7, i.e. FP7 and Horizon 2020, considering also the AAT related JTIs Clean Sky and SESAR. To some extent projects which relate at least partly with “core AAT” will be considered. The assessment will be based on o a statistical analysis of estimated 1000 collaborative research respectively CSA projects. It shall reveal factors facilitating respectively hampering the acceptance of Open Science approaches; o an intense consultation phase with researchers and administrative / legal staff from IND, REC, HES to gather comprehensive first-hand experience about awareness of Open Science as such, per- ceived benefits and drawbacks of the idea and potentially concrete examples. Objective 2 à WP4: Objective 2 is a practically usable guidance for participants in AAT pro- jects. It will be developed taking up the outcome of objective 1 and considering both legal frameworks and the need for an Open Science Code of Conduct.
Project Structure. As a result of the participatory processes carried out during the preparation of the Feasibility Study, the CAMP Levante de Almeria project is structured around three main segments:
A) Horizontal Activities: a) Institutional Coordination and Social Participation (more in Section 2.6.1); b) Environmental Information and Education (more in Section 3.1.2); and c) Training and Capacity Building (more in Section 3.1.3). Each one of these Horizontal Activities is made up of singular projects.
Project Structure. 15 4A. Third Party Licenses and Steering Committee Approval of Third Party Licenses................................. 15 5. Deliverables................................................................................................. 17 5.1 Prototypes.............................................................................................. 17 5.2
Project Structure. In order to realize the main goal and the related sub-goals of ▇▇▇▇▇, we need to have (1) detailed understanding of the level of awareness and acceptance of open science in AAT research, (2) to develop and adapt implementation approaches for open science and (3) to evaluate those approaches. While these three objectives provide tools and practical information to implement open science in AAT research projects it is also necessary to raise the motivation to implement open science within the AAT research community. • Objective 1, WP2, WP3: An assessment of the development of open science in European AAT projects since the beginning of FP7, i.e. FP7 and Horizon 2020, considering also the AAT related JTIs Clean Sky and SESAR. To some extent, projects, which relate at least partly with core AAT research, have been considered. The assessment shall have been based on:
o a statistical analysis of estimated 1500+ collaborative research respectively CSA projects. It should have revealed factors facilitating respectively hampering the acceptance of open science approaches;
Project Structure. In order to realize the main goal and the related sub-goals of ▇▇▇▇▇, we need to have (1) detailed understanding of the level of awareness and acceptance of open science in AAT research, (2) to develop and adapt implementation approaches for open science and (3) to evaluate those approaches. While these three objectives provide tools and practical information to implement open science in AAT research projects it is also necessary to raise the motivation to implement open science within the AAT research community. Objective 1, WP2, WP3: An assessment of the development of open science in European AAT projects since the beginning of FP7, i.e. FP7 and Horizon 2020, considering also the AAT related JTIs Clean Sky and SESAR. To some extent, projects, which relate at least partly with core AAT research, have been considered. The assessment shall have been based on: o a statistical analysis of estimated 1500+ collaborative research respectively CSA projects. It should have revealed factors facilitating respectively hampering the acceptance of open science approaches; o an intense consultation phase with researchers and administrative or legal staff from industry (IND) including SME, research organisations (REC), universities and academia research (HES) to gather comprehensive first-hand experience about awareness of open science as such, perceived benefits and drawbacks of the idea and potentially concrete examples. o However, during the implementation of OSCAR legal constraints prevented accessing the needed EU eCORDA database, thus the statistical analysis had to be replaced by other means in order to identify suitable target projects. Objective 2, WP4: Objective 2 is to develop an open science code of conduct that is tailored to the needs of the European AAT research landscape. This includes analysing current legal constraints and opportunities as well as implementation approaches of open science into the European AAT research landscape. Objective 3, WP5: Objective 3 is to test the (interim) results in the course of WP4, to finalise recommendations targeting legal aspects and to validate the related open science code of conduct by simulating the application of the code of conduct in pilot project cases. Objective 4, WP6: Objectives 1 to 3 will contribute to increase of the implementation of open science in the European AAT research landscape. However, to achieve the ambitious goal of ▇▇▇▇▇, the acceptance of the idea as such, as well as open science code of co...
Project Structure. The Development is divided into two components, the “Residential Improvements” to be completed as the “Residential Development” be located on the ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ property and the airspace over the adjacent public street, and the “Garage Improvements” to be completed as the “Garage Development” located on the ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ property. These improvements will be constructed concurrently and together make up the Development, as approved and entitled by the City.
