Non-Cooperation Clause Samples
The Non-Cooperation clause defines the obligations of parties to actively assist and not hinder each other in fulfilling the terms of the agreement. In practice, this clause may require parties to provide necessary information, respond to reasonable requests, or avoid actions that would delay or obstruct performance. Its core function is to ensure smooth collaboration and prevent one party’s lack of cooperation from undermining the contract’s objectives or causing unnecessary disputes.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 16 times
Non-Cooperation. Employee agrees that he shall not voluntarily provide information to or otherwise cooperate with any individual, corporation, firm, partnership, or other entity who is contemplating or pursuing litigation against Americana and he shall not otherwise voluntarily participate in any threatened or pending litigation against Americana, other than any action brought by Employee to enforce this Agreement or to construe its terms.
Non-Cooperation. To the fullest extent permitted by law and except as otherwise set forth herein, ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ agrees not to cooperate voluntarily with, aid or assist in any way, any other potential or actual plaintiffs that have, or may have in the future, any lawsuits against any of the Released Parties. ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ may cooperate only if compelled to testify under oath pursuant to a lawfully issued subpoena or other similar legal process, notice of which ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ shall give within ten (I 0) days of its receipt to Virtus. ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ agrees that such cooperation will be in a form no more extensive than required by law.
Non-Cooperation. Examiners should note in the examination report whenever there is evidence that an examinee has attempted to falsify or manipulate the test results and whether the examinee was forthcoming in explaining his or her behavior during the test. An opinion that the examinee was Purposefully Non-Cooperative (PNC) is appropriate when there is evidence that an examinee was attempting to alter his or her physiological response data. Examiners reporting an examinee was PNC are not precluded from rendering an opinion that the examinee was deceptive (SR/DI) when the numerical scores support a conclusion that there were significant reactions to one or more relevant questions. Examiners should not render an opinion of truthfulness (NSR/NDI) when there is evidence that an examinee has attempted to falsify or manipulate the test results.
Non-Cooperation. With respect to which you fail to cooperate and provide full disclosure of the circumstances to:
a. us;
b. service providers we have designated;
c. government regulators; or
d. law enforcement personnel.
Non-Cooperation. Employee agrees that he will not counsel or assist any stockholder of the Company, attorneys, their clients or any individual in the presentation or prosecution of any disputes, differences, grievances, claims, charges, or complaints by any third party against the Company and/or any officer, director, employee, agent, representative, stockholder or attorney of the Company, unless (a) under a subpoena or other court order to do so or (b) pursuant to a derivative action against the Company where Employee is in the plaintiff class.
Non-Cooperation. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Employee will not cooperate with, or assist, any person or entity in any complaint, claim or action filed with any federal, state or local court or governmental agency, or any demand for arbitration asserted, against the Company (collectively, the “Legal Proceedings”). The Employee agrees not to discuss, comment, give, or prepare, any writing involving any issue arising out of, or related to, any Legal Proceedings in which the Company is, or shall become, involved without first having been so authorized in writing by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) or by virtue of process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to prevent the Employee from testifying or otherwise participating in any Legal Proceedings after the Employee has been served with either a subpoena or court order compelling the Employee’s participation. In the event that the Employee is issued process by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Employee agrees to notify immediately the Company and, if requested, to meet with the Company’s attorneys before discussing, testifying, commenting, giving or preparing any writing. This Section 6 does not apply to any Legal Proceedings in which the Employee is a party.
Non-Cooperation. Clients who fail to comply with the work participation activities contained in their Self-Sufficiency Plan (SSP) will be subject to sanctions as identified in the Tulalip Tribes TANF Plan, unless good cause is shown and verified by the Tulalip 477/TANF Case Manager and approved by the 477/TANF Manager.
Non-Cooperation. MedQuist acknowledges and agrees that the Anthurium Patents are valid. MedQuist warrants and agrees that it shall not, directly or indirectly, challenge the validity of, or attempt to limit the scope of, the Anthurium Patents, whether in a court proceeding, in a reexamination proceeding, or otherwise, nor will MedQuist assist, directly or indirectly, any third party in doing so, except (a) as required by law, regulation or court order and (b) without limiting Sections 2.3 and 3.1, in defense to any claim asserted against MedQuist under any such Anthurium Patent.
Non-Cooperation. In the event that Buyer and Seller do not cooperate as contemplated herein, such failure shall not be a default hereunder.
Non-Cooperation. As an inducement for Defendant to enter into this Agreement, Plaintiffs further agree, other than as may be required by a subpoena or court order: (i) not to assist or cooperate with any third party or entity (other than a governmental agency) in any complaint, claim, demand, cause of action, charge, or lawsuit of any kind whatsoever against Defendant Entities relating to the allegations in the Lawsuit, (ii) not to encourage any other parties or attorneys to commence a claim or proceeding against Defendant Entities relating to the allegations in the Lawsuit, and (iii) not to refer any current or former employee of Defendant Entities considering a claim or claims relating to the allegations in the Lawsuit to an attorney.