Good Scientific Practice. The parties to this agreement undertake to comply with the Rules of Good Scientific Practice as defined in the TUM Code of Conduct / Ehrenkodex (see xxx.xxx.xx). The candidates are aware that according to § 6 (7) of the TUM Regulations for the Award of Doctoral Degrees scholarly work already submitted for examination purposes may not be re-submitted as part of the doctoral project.
Good Scientific Practice. The parties involved are committed to observing the guidelines that secure good scientific practice and deal with academic misconduct at the TUM (see xxx.xxx.xx). The doctoral candidate is aware that, according to § 6 section 7 of the TUM Regulations for the Award of Doctoral Degrees, his/her own work, having already been used for examination purposes, must not be submitted as a doctoral thesis. Attending a seminar on good scientific practice is recommended.
Good Scientific Practice. Scientific Writing ‣ Presentation Skills ‣ Data visualization 0.2 per day 1 Outreach activities Presentations at international conferences 1 CP/ talk; ½ CP/ poster 1 first author publications in international peer-reviewed journal 1 CP/ submitted 2 CP/ accepted 1 Non-first-author publication in international peer-reviewed journal 1 CP/ publication 0
Good Scientific Practice. The parties hereto undertake to comply with the Code of Conduct for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice and Procedures in Cases of Academic Misconduct (see xxx.xxx.xx). The notice of this code and procedures is confirmed with the signature below. The doctoral candidate is aware that according to § 6 (7) of the Regulations for the Award of Doctoral Degrees of TUM her/his scholarly work already submitted for examination purposes elsewhere must not be re-submitted as doctoral thesis or part of it.
Good Scientific Practice. The parties to this agreement undertake to adhere to the rules concerning good scientific practice and the handling of scientific misconduct (Code of Conduct for Safeguarding Good Academic Practice and Procedures in Cases of Academic Misconduct at Technische Universität München, available at xxx.xxx.xx). The doctoral candidates are aware that according to § 6 (7) of the Regulations for the Award of Doctoral Degrees any scholarly work that has already been submitted for examination purposes may not be resubmitted as part of the doctoral project.
Good Scientific Practice. Both IBA and Boehringer Turkey undertake with regard to publications of the Results of the Project to adhere to the rules of Good Scientific Practice and the guidelines for publications of Project data as outlined e.g. by editors of the major medical journals as well as all ethical standards concerning publications and authorship.
Good Scientific Practice. The doctoral candidate and the doctoral committee agree to observe the code “Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice. Code of Conduct”5 issued by the German Research Foundation (DFG). In case of LIfBi employees, all parties agree to additionally observe the rules for good scientific practice issued by LIfBi. Members of the University of Bamberg agree to observe the respective rules of the university concerning good scientific practice.6 In alleged cases of scientific misconduct, the parties concerned shall turn to the respective ombudsperson or his/her deputy.
Good Scientific Practice. The Charity expects the highest standards of integrity to be adhered to by the Host Institution and the Staff. The Host Institution must ensure that it has in place formal procedures for the investigation of allegations of scientific misconduct.
Good Scientific Practice. The person pursuing a doctoral degree undertakes to comply with the regulations concerning good scientific practice, in particular the ordinance on dealing with scientific misconduct at the University of Zurich (Integrity Ordinance, LS 415.27). The person doing the doctorate takes the recommendations of the Open Science Policy of the University of Zurich into account in his/her work. Regarding the use of artificial intelligence, the general rules of the Faculty of Business, Economics and Informatics apply.
Good Scientific Practice. The University of Würzburg has enacted “Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice and Procedures Concerning Scientific Misconduct” and established a “Standing Commission for the Investigation of Scientific Misconduct” as well as a group of Ombudspersons. These guidelines can be found on the websites of the University of Würzburg1 and the Graduate School of Life Sciences2. The DFG (German Research Foundation) provides overarching guidelines which all universities and non- university research centres are obliged to implement. Further information on the most up-to-date version of these guidelines can be found on the website of the DFG. In addition, the GSLS requires the doctoral researchers to take part in its mandatory course on “Responsible Conduct of Research/Good Scientific Practice” within the first six months of their project (counts as one elective from the Research and Training Plan). All parties to the agreement shall undertake to adhere to the principles of good scientific practice as stipulated above and, where applicable, supplementary regulations formulated by other institutions, funding sources or publication organs that may be involved in the project. 1xxxxx://xxx.xxx-xxxxxxxxx.xx/en/research/service/good-scientific-practice/ 2xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx-xxxxxxxxx.xx/life-sciences/doctoral-researchers/training/good- scientific-practice/
