Figure 3 Sample Clauses

Figure 3. WBS Structure‌ The HET2 WBS Dictionary is given in Table 16. Astrobee research and development (WBS 210935.04.xx.01) is managed at ARC (WBS 219035.04.01.01). R2 research and development (WBS 210935.04.xx.02) is managed at JSC (WBS 219035.04.05.02). Table 16. WBS Dictionary‌ 219035 Human Exploration Telerobotics 2 (HET2) Project to develop advanced, remotely operated robots to improve human exploration 219035.04 HET2 Technology Development Technology development within HET2 219035.04.xx.01 Astrobee Development of a new IVA free-flying robot for the ISS 219035.04.01.01 Astrobee (ARC) Element project management (budget, schedule, risk), systems engineering (requirements, architecture, integration), development, testing, safety and mission assurance. 219035.04.10.01 Astrobee (HQ) Astrobee cooperative agreements and contracts 219035.04.11.01 Astrobee (JPL) Astrobee data communications and robot user interface development 219035.04.05.01 Astrobee (JSC) Astrobee integration and testing 219035.04.xx.02 Robonaut 2 Development of a new IVA / ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ humanoid robot for the ISS 219035.04.01.02 Robonaut 2 (ARC) Robonaut 2 engineering support at ARC 219035.04.11.02 Robonaut 2 (JPL) Robonaut 2 engineering support at JPL

Figure 3. Mindfulness as a buffer of the prospective relation between emotional distress and reported somatic symptoms: a SEModel

Figure 3. 2.2.1.1 Some actors speak in favour of the creation of a platform grouping all of the calls for tenders related to PPAs The standard agreement prepared by FEE provides that the PPA may be entered into with or without a support mechanism. However, in practice, as explained below, companies would rather choose a PPA related to an installation that does not benefit from a support mechanism, so that they can benefit from GOs. The conditions precedent will naturally depend on the project maturity. The model chosen by FEE is that of a physical PPA, which relates to the selling of electricity, guarantees of origin, and ▇▇▇▇▇- ▇▇▇ capacity certificates. Both the FEE standard agree- ment and the guide published by La Plateforme Verte are about bilateral GC PPAs only, i.e. GC PPAs entered into between a sole buyer and a sole producer. These standard agreements would have to be adapted in the event there are several customers and/or several producers. 2.2.2 The main contractual provisions and points of attention

Figure 3. Model simulated shortwave and longwave cloud radiative effects (CRE) in W m−2 shown as differences from observations at (left panels) the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) and (right panels) surface (SFC) for December-January-February (DJF) mean and June-July-August (JJA) mean.

Figure 3. Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Inter-rater agreement and intra-rater agreement for normative parameters at 60 ml balloon fill volume. All values showed good-to-excellent agreement. Inter- and intra-rater agreement data are presented as ICC and PCC (95% CI). ICC and PCC agreement: <0.40 (poor); 0.40–0.59 (fair); 0.6–0.74 (good); and 0.75–1.00 (excellent). Upper and lower limits of error bars represent the 95% CI. CI, confidence intervals; ICC, Intraclass correlation coefficient; PCC, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ correlation coefficient. Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al.

Figure 3. From: Quick et al. 2002. “Diarrhea Prevention Through Household-­‐Level Water Disinfection and Safe Storage in Zambia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 66(5), 2002, pp. 584–589 16

Figure 3. . a) Rolling mill components to be considered in the thermal crown model, b) Circular ring of roll

Figure 3. 4: Total fraction of the ini- tial mass of an SSP ejected by AGB stars at time t = ∞ as a func- tion of initial stellar metal mass frac- tion, assuming the yields of van den Hoek & Groenewegen (1997) (black, thick lines), Marigo (2001) (red, medium thick lines), or ▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. (2004) (blue, thin lines). The calculations assume a Chabrier IMF and integrate the yields over a stel- lar initial mass range [0.8, 6] M⊙, but the fractions are normalized to the mass range [0.1, 100] M⊙. Differ- ent yield sets predict similar ejected mass fractions. The ejected mass fraction is insensitive to metallicity. puffs up and is eventually shed, causing the star to lose up to 60 % of its mass. Prior to the AGB phase, material in the core (where most of the heavy elements reside) is dredged up into the envelope via convection. As a result, the ejecta are particularly rich in carbon and nitrogen. Building on pioneering work by ▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (1978) and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇ (1981), various groups have published AGB yields (▇.▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 1997; ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 1997; ▇▇▇▇▇▇ 2001; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. 2001; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. 2002; ▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. 2004). Table 3.3 outlines the extent of the resolution (in mass and metallicity) of the AGB yields of van den Hoek & Groenewegen (1997), ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2001) and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. (2004), which are some of the most complete sets for our purposes. These yields are compared in Fig. 3.3, which shows the abundance relative to hydrogen, in solar units6, of various elements in the ejecta as a function of stellar metallicity. These calculations are for an SSP with a Chabrier IMF and the mass range [0.8, 6] M⊙ at time t = ∞. The yields agree very well at solar metallicity, and for the case of helium, this agreement extends to lower metallicities. However, for nitrogen, oxygen, and particularly carbon, different yields sets give very different results at low metallicities. We show in Fig. 3.4, for each yield set, the integrated fraction of the initial SSP mass ejected by stars in the mass range [0.8, 6] M⊙ at time t = ∞, normalized to the total initial stellar mass over the range [0.1, 100] M⊙. The ejected mass fractions are very similar for the different yield sets. In this work we use the yields of Marigo (2001). Although these only go up to 5 M⊙, they form a complete set with the SN Type II yields of Portinari et al. (1998) since they are both based on the Padova evolutionary tracks. Indeed, there are very few yield pairings that form a consiste...

Figure 3. 2 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Fountain