Explanatory Notes. The specific abbreviations shall be as follows, and wherever such terms are used in this article, they shall be used as follows: ADAPM - Anti-Drug/Alcohol Program Manager DHHS - Department of Health and Human Services EAP - Employee Assistance Program EBTD - Evidential Breath Testing Devise FHWA - Federal Highway Administration MRO - Medical Review Officer SAP - Substance Abuse Professional
Explanatory Notes. (a) The references to "contracting party" in the provisions of GATT 1994 shall be deemed to read "Member". The references to "less-developed contracting party" and "developed contracting party" shall be deemed to read "developing country Member" and "developed country Member". The references to "Executive Secretary" shall be deemed to read "Director-General of the WTO".
Explanatory Notes. See Appendix 1 Annex 1 - Part 1 - Appendix 3 Model information document Pursuant to Regulation No. 107 relating to type approval of a M2 or M3 vehicle where the bodywork has previously obtained the type approval as a separate technical unit, with respect to its general construction The following information, if applicable, shall be supplied in triplicate and include a list of contents. Any drawings shall be supplied in appropriate scale and in sufficient detail on size A4 or on a folder of A4 format. Photographs, if any, shall show sufficient detail. If the systems, components or separate technical units have electronic controls, information concerning their performance shall be supplied.
Explanatory Notes. Company purchase agreement: cash and shares, part deferred General matters
Explanatory Notes. Loan agreement: company borrower; secured on physical assets; guarantor option General notes
Explanatory Notes. See Appendix 1 1 Delete where not applicable (there are cases where nothing needs to be deleted when more than one entry is applicable). Annex 1 - Part 2 - Appendix 1 Communication (Maximum format: A4 (210 x 297 mm)) issued by: Name of administration: ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... Concerning:2 Approval granted Approval extended Approval refused Approval withdrawn Production definitively discontinued
Explanatory Notes. Only for the following specific reasons, the preferential treatment may be refused without verification of the Proofs of Origin as they can be considered as inapplicable when:
Explanatory Notes. See Appendix 1 Annex 1 - Part 1 - Appendix 4 Model information document relation to UN Regulation No. 107 relating to type approval of a fire suppression system as a component The following information, if applicable, shall be supplied in triplicate and include a list of contents. Any drawings shall be supplied in appropriate scale and in sufficient detail on size A4 or on a folder of A4 format. Photographs, if any, shall show sufficient detail. If the components have electronic controls, information concerning their performance shall be supplied.
Explanatory Notes. It is understood that, under the revised Australian law, charterers can be strictly liable for penalties and fines imposed on them as a result of a pollution or threat of pollution caused by the act or negligence of the owner (e.g. navigational error). Conversely, owners can be strictly liable for penalties and fines imposed on them as a result of a pollution or threat of pollution caused by the act or negligence of the charterer (e.g. unsafe berth). As this involves circumstances beyond owners’ and charterers’ control, a charterparty clause is recommended to achieve the effect that whoever causes the Pollution Incident should bear the criminal fines or penalties through indemnification. Under the clause, owners have overall responsibility for responding to a discharge or threat of discharge of oil, oily mixture or oily residue (subparagraph (a)). This is in line with the Australian legislation and with the international compensation regime. The indemnity in subparagraphs (b) i. and ii. is designed to protect owners and charterers by incorporating an equal indemnity by the party whose negligent act or omission, or breach of chartererparty, causes pollution or threat of pollution. The proviso to subparagraphs (b) (i) and (ii) ensures that club cover is not prejudiced on the grounds that liability has been contractually assumed by virtue of the clause in circumstances where there may not be an underlying legal liability. The proviso restricts the amount of recovery where there is contributory fault. The recovery of fines under the clause is also subject to such recovery not being prohibited under the law governing the charterparty. The indemnity in this clause extends to the recovery of any reasonable legal costs and/or other expenses incurred by or awarded against either party in respect of any proceedings instituted against them for the imposition of any fine or other penalty in circumstances set out in subparagraph (b,) irrespective of whether any fine or other penalty is actually imposed. The indemnity in this clause will not respond to the situation where the pollution or threat of pollution is entirely caused by a third party’s act, without involving any act of the owner or of the charterer, but where the owner or charterer still incurs the penalty or fine under the new Australian law. The clause only addresses the specific situation of criminal fines and civil penalties, not civil liability which is within the sphere of the Conventions. Any right of r...
