Evaluation Questions. Q1. Describe the customer service team that will be dedicated to the State of Florida account, including the team structure and how State of Florida users will be able to contact your company for customer service.
Evaluation Questions. This section is worth 250 points in the Technical Proposal. Each Question will be assigned points based evaluation criteria outlined below: Evaluation Questions
Evaluation Questions. The crawler used in the evaluation has four functions; each of them was inspected.
Evaluation Questions. Below are a set of general questions organized by categories that support the evaluation goals and objectives. The purpose of listing these general questions is to facilitate dialogue between the evaluation team, CIRD management and USAID to determine if the evaluation is meeting their needs and expectations. Technical progress toward achieving results • Is the CIRD technical strategy clearly linked to the USAID results? • Is the workplan and activitie s clearly linked to the USAID results? • What measurable progress has been made toward each of the objectives? • Does the monitoring and evaluation plan, process and tools adequately measure the desired results? • If there have been problems achieving the stated results, what have they been and why? • How can the strategy and/or workplan be modified to address these challenges? Management support toward achieving results • Has CIRD hired the staff and consultants with the appropriate skills and experience? Is there enough staff to carry out the workplan within budget? • Do CIRD staff and consultants’ scopes of work job match the technical program? Is the staff fully utilized to their potential? Is the staff producing the desired technical results? • Does the workplan program the right type and mix of technical activities that will lead to the desired technical results? • Does the budget support these activities? • Does CIRD management review workplan activities and budgets on a regular basis to ensure that activities are on-time and on-track to deliver results? Do they review it with the staff? • Do CIRD staff and consultants receive adequate and timely guidance and feedback on their work from Project Director? From USAID? Quality of CIRD technical assistance • Does CIRD provide timely and quality technical assistance that responds to the counterparts needs? • How well do CIRD staff work with the counterparts? With USAID? With other partner organizations? • Do CIRD staff use the latest methodologies and technical approaches in their work? • What is positive and you want CIRD to continue and/or expand? • How can CIRD improve the quality of their technical assistance?
Evaluation Questions. It is expected that the evaluation questions will be guided by the OECD DAC criteria for evaluating development assistance, which are: relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability. The additional criteria of coverage and inclusivity are also relevant here, given the results promised for women. The final list of evaluation questions will be agreed during the inception phase of the evaluation manager’s assignment. However, it is anticipated that the evaluation will address the following questions: How effective was the programme as a whole in delivering the promised outcomes and impacts? (Impact in the DAC criteria) Were the outcomes and impacts delivered relevant to beneficiaries needs? (Relevance in the DAC criteria) Were the interventions really catalytic? How did the interventions interact with other factors in the local and regional economy? (Impact and sustainability in the DAC criteria) How effective were individual interventions in delivering the intended outcomes? If some interventions were more successful than others, why? Were these the right combination of interventions? (Impact, effectiveness and efficiency in the DAC criteria) How effective is the market system analysis approach in delivering more relevant interventions that improve incomes and reduce poverty? (Impact, effectiveness, relevance in the DAC criteria) To what extent did the programme’s interventions stimulate the continuation in the market of exiting players and the entry of other players into the market in a long term, positive and sustainable way? (Sustainability in the DAC criteria) How effective was the programme in meeting its results promised for women and girls, who were only 7% of beneficiaries in PropCom 1? such as: What kinds of interventions were most effective in increasing the incomes of women and girls? Were there trade-offs between the aims of increasing the participation of poor people in markets, and increasing the incomes of women and girls specifically? (Impact, effectiveness, efficiency and coverage and inclusivity in the DAC criteria) What is the effect of insecurity on the programmes interventions? (Sustainability in the OECD DAC criteria) What is the effect of climatic and food shocks on the programmes interventions? (Sustainability in the OECD DAC criteria)
Evaluation Questions. Evaluation questions should be informed by the theories of change, and the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) evaluation criteria. It is expected that the Mid-Term Evaluations will focus particularly on the DAC evaluation criteria of efficiency, effectiveness and relevance. The End- Programme Evaluations should additionally cover the criteria of impact and sustainability.1
Evaluation Questions. The evaluation of program effectiveness focuses on how well the program is being marketed and implemented and the reactions of participating employees to the various program components. Factors that can being reviewed to determine whether the program is being properly administered are reach, awareness, satisfaction, knowledge gained and improved health habits or conditions. The primary questions the evaluation seeks to address and the associated indicators are displayed in Table 1. TABLE 1 Workplace Wellness Program Evaluation Questions and Indicators Evaluation Questions Indicators
Evaluation Questions. This M&E Plan contains the following evaluation questions; however, the final list of questions will be documented in the final evaluation designs. Facility Sub-Activity: Wherever relevant, each evaluation question shall be addressed for both funding windows
Evaluation Questions. The IEB will evaluate the extent to which IGC successfully influences the adoption and implementation of credible growth policies in developing countries, and influences global debates. The IEB should be guided by considering the evaluation questions below, but are free to set their own, and ensure alignment with the evaluation purpose and objectives set out in Section 2 above as well as recognised evaluation criteria (the DAC evaluation criteria).
Evaluation Questions. Task 1: The evaluator shall collaborate with the stakeholders to develop agreed-upon questions for the guidance of the evaluation study at a preliminary meeting. This meeting shall take place prior to the development of this contract.
