DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION Clause Samples

DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. Subcontractor will collect and maintain data and records necessary to document services, individuals served, outcomes and any other information set forth in the Scope of Work or which Rubicon or WDBCCC require to fulfill the terms of the contract between Rubicon and WDBCCC. The processes, procedures and manner of information collections and retention is outlined in Quality Assurance guidelines that will be provided

DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. A. In accordance with FERPA policies, the Community Colleges will create policies and procedures to share the number of degrees awarded and other outcomes and data with their partner Four-Year Institutions on an annual basis; and the Four- Year Institutions and Community Colleges will submit any annual reports that might be required by the NJ Presidents’ Council and/or the Secretary of Higher Education. B. The NJ Presidents’ Council and the Secretary of Higher Education will create policies and procedures to review the effectiveness and success of the Agreement on an annual basis; and adjust the terms of the Agreement as needed.

DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. Methodology: 1. To evaluate the Ministry of Education’s processes of Standards and Evaluations, ASJ/TI, in cooperation with the Minister of Education, selected three measurement standards to evaluate: Teacher Evaluations, Evaluation of Student Academic Achievement and Days in Class. 2. ASJ/TI then met with key actors and evaluators within the Ministry of Education in order to collect documentation, analyze procedures, and offer recommendations. Teacher Performance Evaluations: Requested Documentation: Documentation Delivered Complete 46.15% Documentation Delivered Incomplete 46.15% Documentation Not Delivered 7.70% Documentation Delivered Complete 27.28% Documentation Delivered Incomplete 18.18% Documentation Not Delivered 54.54% Findings on Days of Class: Requested Documentation: Documentation Delivered Complete 0% Documentation Delivered Incomplete 0% Documentation Not Delivered 100% • ASJ-affiliate Transformemos Honduras (“Let’s Transform Honduras”) was instrumental in recording actual school days that students spent in class versus the legally-required minimum of 200 days. While Transformemos Honduras figures confirm that over the last two years, schools have met for at least 200 days (218 in 2013 and 224 in 2014), this information was not recorded or received by the Ministry of Education. o The Ministry of Education had neither protocol nor observable practice for recording students’ days in class. The average compliance and transparency score for these three selected processes is summarized in the following table. This percentage is not a qualification of the standards of Teacher or Student performance, rather a representation of the processes and transparency of their measurement. Teacher Performance Evaluations 92.30% Student Academic Achievement Evaluations 45.46% Days in Class 0% • Create and enforce a consistent method of teacher evaluations, administered through an independent entity within the Ministry of Education, and use the results as a basis for promotions. • Develop a mechanism in which everyone – authorities, parents, students, and citizens in general – has access to the results of the academic achievement evaluations. • Document days that students spend in class through the leadership of the Ministry of Education and with the oversight of civil society.

DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. Objective: To develop an understanding of the project and obtain the required information to accurately design the improvements.

DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. Objective - To provide for appropriate system evaluation through the use of quality data collection and other methods to improve system performance and evaluation. Tasks: The responsibilities of the EMS agency, at a minimum, include: • Reviewing reportable incidents North Coast EMS reviews all discovered or received reportable incidents. During this quarter we took no formal action but reviewed or plan to review disclosure protected cases during TAC and STEMI meetings, and as needed. • Reviewing prehospital care reports including Automated External Defibrillator (AED) reports These reports were discontinued by EMSA years ago. North Coast EMS participates in the C.A.R.E.S. program. • Processing and investigating quality assurance/improvement incident reports North Coast EMS oversees an extensive Quality Improvement Program and utilizes our Regional QIP Plan, which was submitted to EMSA last quarter. QIP Plans have previously been approved by North Coast EMS for all Base Hospitals and ALS Providers, who also submit quarterly QIP updates. • Monitoring and reporting on EMS System Core Measures by March 31st each year, and acknowledging completion of the monitoring and reporting as of March 31st each year North Coast EMS submitted state requested Core Measures Report data. APOT data reports are received monthly from the state and shared with agencies and facilities. Our APOT averages continue to be relatively low. • Providing near real time data to CEMSIS, or at no less than monthly intervals See above. ImageTrend data goes directly to ICEMA upon completion of each e-PCR by EMTs and paramedics. Several other vendors e-PCR programs were previously approved by us for use and data continues to be submitted to ICEMA by each ALS Provider. The North Coast EMS JPA Governing Board previously approved an Annual ImageTrend Base/Access Fee for all providers to cover our ICEMA ImageTrend access costs and all fees are currently paid. • Implementing Health and Safety Code Section 1797.227, including providing data from Electronic Health Records (EHR) using the current NEMSIS and CEMSIS version standards All ALS Providers utilize NEMSIS and CEMSIS compliant EHR programs. The required upgrade to 3.5 has been completed regionwide. • Engaging healthcare partners and Health Information Organizations in your jurisdiction in discussions and planning efforts to integrate EMS into developing health information exchange networks that promote interoperability and the use of the Search,...

DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION a. Arlington will provide any existing models, topography/terrain data, reports, applicable memorandums, shapefiles, and survey data related to the project. b. Arlington will provide record drawings of storm drain plans for the area. This information will be used for the basis of the storm drain analysis and will be supplemented with field survey information. c. Arlington will provide flooding surveys and drainage complaints for affected properties in the study area. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ will use the provided information and terrain data as part of the base data. Terrain data will also be used to supplement hydraulic model preparation and for preparation of flood delineations, as needed. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ will identify and collect any supplemental survey required for conceptual analysis. This could include curb and gutter elevations, storm drain manhole flowlines, outfall flowlines, inlet flowlines, and other drainage features necessary to prepare the analysis. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ will visit the site and general watershed area to make general observations and to take photos for reference. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ will develop a base map of existing conditions from the data collected in the phase, to utilize for the evaluation of existing conditions and for the alternatives analysis o Sub-surface engineering to determine actual locations of underground storm drain systems or other utilities o More detailed surveys required for design

DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. Objective - To provide for appropriate system evaluation through the use of quality data collection and other methods to improve system performance and evaluation. Workload Indicators: • Total patient care reports generated • Total trauma patients • Total cardiac patients • Total medical patients • Total pediatric patients • Total number of situational/unusual occurrence reports processed by EMS agency • Workload gap metrics identified in BCP 4120-022-BCP-2022-A1

DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. School staff will participate in training conducted by NM GEAR UP staff and program contractors. School staff will collect and record data for all GEAR UP contacts with students using manual and online data collection systems.

DATA COLLECTION AND EVALUATION. Objective: Collect site and facility information sufficient to analyze the existing system and prepare a comprehensive base map for design.