Credit Evaluation Sample Clauses

Credit Evaluation. Credit reports and re-evaluation of credit: You authorize Lender to obtain business and personal credit bureau reports in the name of the Customer or its owners, at any time. You agree to submit to Lender current financial information in the name of the Customer and to submit to Lender, current financial information in its name, and the name of its owners at any time upon request. Such information shall be used for the purpose of evaluating or re-evaluating Customer’s or its owners’ creditworthiness. You also authorize Lender to use such information and to share it with its affiliates in order to determine whether you are qualified for other products and services offered by Lender and its affiliates. Lender may report its credit experience with Customer, its owners’, and Customer’s Loan(s) to third parties. Customer agrees that Lender may release information about Customer, its owners’, the Loan Borrower(s)’ and/or Customer’s Loan to Lender affiliates. Important Notice about Credit Reporting: Lender may report information about your Loan(s) to credit bureaus and/or consumer reporting agencies in your name or the name of your business organization. Late payments, missed payments, or other defaults on your Loan(s) may be reflected in your personal credit report or your business organization’s credit report(s).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Credit Evaluation. Aggregator with a demonstrable current credit rating of Baa2 or higher from Xxxxx’x or BBB or higher from Standard and Poor’s, Fitch, or Duff & Xxxxxx, is deemed to be creditworthy unless SCE determines that a material change in the Aggregator’s creditworthiness has occurred. SCE requires Aggregator to complete a credit application including financial information reasonably necessary to establish credit. The creditworthiness evaluation may be conducted by an outside credit analysis agency, determined by SCE, with final credit approval granted by SCE. This evaluation will be completed within 10 business days. Credit reports will remain strictly confidential between the credit analysis agency and SCE. A credit application processing fee, as approved by the CPUC, may be charged to offset the cost of determining the Aggregator’s creditworthiness.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Credit Evaluation. 6.1 The Credit Department will utilize various tools available during the credit evaluation process to determine the clients’ credit worthiness. Such tools include, but may not be limited to, Dun & Bradstreet Reports and credit and/or bank references. If the client currently uses a teleservice center, Convergys may choose to contact that center for a reference.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Credit Evaluation. In connection with the Accountholder’s application for participation in the Purchase Program, Accountholder hereby authorizes TreviPay and its employees, lawyers, agents, assigns, and successors to obtain from, and share with, Merchant any information Accountholder provides to TreviPay, Merchant through any means (including in connection with the Accountholder’s application for an Account), and investigate the Accountholder’s credit history in connection with Accountholder’s application, including, without limitation, through commercial reporting companies, and direct inquiries to businesses where Accountholder has accounts. If TreviPay determines that credit cannot be extended based on existing credit history or current credit events, then TreviPay, in its sole and absolute discretion, may approve an Account creation by requiring a security deposit, guaranty, or other collateral in order to open or to continue the Account. The Accountholder authorizes TreviPay to share with Merchant whether its application for credit has been approved.
Sample 1Sample 2
Credit Evaluation. Seller with a demonstrable current credit rating of Baa2 or higher from Xxxxx’x or BBB or higher from Standard and Poor’s, Fitch or Duff & Xxxxxx, is deemed to be creditworthy unless SCE determines that a material change in the Seller’s creditworthiness has occurred. SCE requires Seller to complete a credit application including financial information reasonably necessary to establish credit. The creditworthiness evaluation may be conducted by an outside credit analysis agency, determined by SCE, with final credit approval granted by SCE. This evaluation will be completed within 10 business days. Credit reports will remain strictly confidential between the credit analysis agency and SCE. A credit application processing fee, as approved by the Commission, may be charged to offset the cost of determining the Seller’s creditworthiness.
Sample 1
Credit Evaluation. Each Participant will be subject to a complete credit evaluation in order for PJMSettlement to determine creditworthiness and to establish an Unsecured Credit Allowance, if applicable; provided, however, that a Participant need not provide the information specified in section I.A or I.B if it notifies PJMSettlement in writing that it does not seek any Unsecured Credit Allowance. PJMSettlement will identify any necessary Financial Security requirements and establish a Working Credit Limit for each Participant. In addition, PJMSettlement will perform follow-up credit evaluations on at least an annual basis. If a Corporate Guaranty is being utilized to establish credit for a Participant, the guarantor will be evaluated and the Unsecured Credit Allowance or Financial Security requirement will be based on the financial strength of the Guarantor. PJMSettlement will provide a Participant, upon request, with a written explanation for any change in credit levels or collateral requirements. PJMSettlement will provide such explanation within ten Business Days. If a Participant believes that either its level of unsecured credit or its collateral requirement has been incorrectly determined, according to this credit policy, then the Participant may send a request for reconsideration in writing to PJMSettlement. Such a request should include: • A citation to the applicable section(s) of the PJMSettlement credit policy along with an explanation of how the respective provisions of the credit policy were not carried out in the determination as made • A calculation of what the Participant believes should be the correct credit level or collateral requirement, according to terms of the credit policy PJMSettlement will reconsider the determination and will provide a written response as promptly as practical, but no longer than ten Business Days of receipt of the request. If the Participant still feels that the determination is incorrect, then the Participant may contest that determination. Such contest should be in written form, addressed to PJMSettlement, and should contain: • A complete copy of the Participant’s earlier request for reconsideration, including citations and calculations • A copy of PJMSettlement’s written response to its request for reconsideration • An explanation of why it believes that the determination still does not comply with the credit policy PJMSettlement will investigate and will respond to the Participant with a final determination on the matter as p...
Sample 1
Credit Evaluation. QGM may as it deems necessary determine the TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FOR THOSE TERMS HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THE REDACTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH TWO ASTERISKS (**). acceptability of Shipper’s overall financial condition, working capital and profitability trends.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Credit Evaluation. 7.1 During the term of this Agreement, Party A will assess Party B's credit and good faith on the basis of such indicators as Party B's breaches in the operation of services, users' complaints, coordination, product dial and testing (on a monthly basis) and apply related requirements under this Agreement and corresponding incentive and restrictive policies based on the assessment.
Sample 1
Credit Evaluation. A. All credits submitted for advancement and status on the salary schedule shall be required to have the approval of a committee made up of the Director of Human Resources, an elementary teacher and principal, and a secondary teacher and principal. Teachers are to be selected by the AEA. Credits submitted to the committee for advancement on the salary schedule must be submitted prior to September 1 and/or February 1 in order for an approved lane change to be implemented for the current school year. Lane changes submitted by September 1 and approved will result in a salary/lane change for the entire school year; those submitted by February 1 and approved will result in a one- half (1/2) year salary/lane change. Mid-year lane changes result in lateral step moves on the schedule, even when moving from a frozen lane. Experience while on a frozen step/lane is not added when moving to an unfrozen lane. Credits for approval must be submitted on credit approval forms, available from the District, along with verification of completed course work. Credits and educational programs used to establish status and advancement on the salary schedule shall be earned from an accredited education program as determined by the Superintendent and evaluated semi-annually. The decision of the committee shall not be reversed through the grievance procedure unless its decision was unreasonable and/or arbitrary. The committee shall select a chairperson from among its committee members. Committee action shall be by majority vote of the full membership of the committee. Credit evaluation and conversion: Reference to credits in this Article and on Schedules A and B are quarter credits. Semester credits will be multiplied by a factor of 1.5 for calculation purposes and converted to quarter credits (i.e. 3 semester credits x 1.5 = 4.5 quarter credits).
Sample 1

Related to Credit Evaluation

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • FINANCIAL EVALUATION (a) The financial bid shall be opened of only those bidders who have been found to be technically eligible. The financial bids shall be opened in presence of representatives of technically eligible bidders, who may like to be present. The institute shall inform the date, place and time for opening of financial bid.

  • Trust Evaluation As of the Evaluation Time (a) on the last Business Day of each year, (b) on the day on which any Unit is tendered for redemption and (c) on any other day desired by the Trustee or requested by the Depositor, the Trustee shall: Add (i) all moneys on deposit in a Trust (excluding (1) cash, cash equivalents or Letters of Credit deposited pursuant to Section 2.01 hereof for the purchase of Contract Securities, unless such cash or Letters of Credit have been deposited in the Interest and Principal Accounts because of failure to apply such moneys to the purchase of Contract Securities pursuant to the provisions of Sections 2.01, 3.03 and 3.04 hereof and (2) moneys credited to the Reserve Account pursuant to Section 3.05 hereof), plus (ii) the aggregate Evaluation of all Securities (including Contract Securities and Reinvestment Securities) on deposit in such Trust as is determined by the Evaluator (such evaluations shall take into account and itemize separately (i) the cash on hand in the Trust or moneys in the process of being collected from matured interest coupons or bonds matured or called for redemption prior to maturity, (ii) the value of each issue of the Securities in the Trust on the bid side of the market as determined by the Evaluator pursuant to Section 4.01, and (iii) interest accrued thereon not subject to collection and distribution). For each such Evaluation there shall be deducted from the sum of the above (i) amounts representing any applicable taxes or governmental charges payable out of the respective Trust and for which no deductions shall have previously been made for the purpose of addition to the Reserve Account, (ii) amounts representing estimated accrued fees of the Trust and expenses of such Trust including but not limited to unpaid fees and expenses of the Trustee, the Evaluator, the Supervisor, the Depositor and bond counsel, in each case as reported by the Trustee to the Evaluator on or prior to the date of evaluation, (iii) any moneys identified by the Trustee, as of the date of the Evaluation, as held for distribution to Unitholders of record as of a Record Date or for payment of the Redemption Value of Units tendered prior to such date and (iv) unpaid organization costs in the estimated amount per Unit set forth in the Prospectus. The resulting figure is herein called a "Trust Fund Evaluation." The value of the pro rata share of each Unit of the respective Trust determined on the basis of any such evaluation shall be referred to herein as the "Unit Value."

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.