Content Review. You acknowledge that, in order to ensure compliance with legal obligations, SurveyMonkey may be required to review certain content submitted to the Services to determine whether it is illegal or whether it violates these Terms (such as when unlawful content is reported to us). We may also modify, prevent access to, delete, or refuse to display content that we believe violates the law or these Terms. However, SurveyMonkey otherwise has no obligation to monitor or review any content submitted to the Services.
Content Review. Language content was reviewed and approved by the Utah AG’s office on February 2, 2015. Moab City Utah Department of Transportation By Date By Date
Content Review. TriplePoint shall review and approve all Deliverables produced by Influencer before any such Deliverable is posted or otherwise released to the public, unless the nature of the Deliverable (e.g., livestream) means that the Deliverable is created in real-time. Influencer will provide each prepared Deliverable to TriplePoint and will not post or otherwise release it to the public until the Deliverable has been approved by TriplePoint. For Deliverables which are created in real-time, Influencer shall provide a link to TriplePoint for real-time access and, if technologically feasible, a copy of the Deliverable after its creation.
Content Review. McKesson and AvantGo will cooperate to remove any -------------- Content that is defamatory, obscene, infringing, deemed hate speech, unlawfully invasive or in any other way unlawful, or that encourages violence, or otherwise is in violation of the Content Partner Agreements.
Content Review. As detailed in the Influencer Master Services Agreement, TriplePoint reserves the right to review your content ahead of posting. Content review is done on a case by case basis. In the event TriplePoint requests to review your content before posting, you will provide the content to TriplePoint in a timely manner and will not post it anywhere until it is approved by TriplePoint. This does not apply to livestreams.
Content Review. The Foundation shall provide YFS staff a reasonable opportunity to review in advance of publication any content produced by the Foundation regarding YFS programs for factual errors and omissions, but only insofar as the content describes YFS Department programming, services, personnel, or events or other City functions.
Content Review. You acknowledge that, in order to ensure compliance with legal obligations, Momentive may be required to review certain content submitted to the Services to determine whether it is illegal or whether it violates these Terms (such as when unlawful content is reported to us). We may also modify, prevent access to, delete, or refuse to display content that we believe violates the law or these Terms. In the event your Content includes third-party brands, logos or other source identifiers, we may require you to submit a statement of non-affiliation before you may use such Content in connection with the Services. However, Momentive otherwise has no obligation to monitor or review any content submitted to the Services.
Content Review. Language content was reviewed and approved by the Utah AG’s office on February 2, 2015.
Content Review. Language content was reviewed and approved by the Utah AG’s office on February 2, 2015. Moab, Utah Utah Department of Transportation By Date By Date Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, City Engineer Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Project Manager By Date By Date Mayor Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Region 4 Deputy Director By Date By Date Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, City Recorder Comptrollers Office 11/3/21, 7:55 AM State of Utah Mail - 400 E Bridge Widening Info Xxxxx Xxxxxx <xxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx> 000 X Xxxxxx Widening Info 11 messages Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx <xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx> Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:31 AM To: xxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx Devin, I’ve worked with XX at CSI to evaluate alternative designs that would achieve our project objectives. We’ve prepared the info below for your review. The City of Moab has set the following goals for the Pack Creek Bridge Widening Project: Continue to provide one lane of traffic in each direction Widen bridge to accommodate continuous active transportation across the structure Provide bike lanes in each direction Replace failing steel walkway with concrete sidewalk Maintain a No Net Rise condition for the floodplain Deliver project for a maximum budget of $740,000 Complete construction in 2022 No ROW procurement No new utilities No existing bridge rehabilitation or load strengthening No CLOMR/LOMR Project Budget Summary General Construction (Mob, TC, Survey, PI, etc) = $95k Bridge Widening = $300k Roadway Tie-ins = $90k PE/CE = $142k Contingency = $100k Total Construction = $485k 11/3/21, 7:55 AM State of Utah Mail - 400 E Bridge Widening Info Total Project = $730k Attached is a sheet showing existing, what was originally requested funding for and what we are proposing now that corresponds to this cost estimate. Let me know if you’d like to discuss or send the agreement so I can start the review process for signing. Thanks, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx PE City Engineer City of Moab 000 Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx,XX 00000 Office: 000-000-0000 Cell: 000-000-0000 Moab Alternative Sheet.pdf 140K Xxxxx Xxxxxx <xxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx> Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 7:02 AM To: Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx <xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx> This is perfect Xxxxx thanks! I need to run it by Monte - give me a couple days. [Quoted text hidden] -- Xxxxx Xxxxxx, PE, PTOE | Project Manager UDOT | UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Content Review. Language content was reviewed and approved by the Utah AG’s office on August 16, 2018. LOCAL AGENCY Utah Department of Transportation By By Region Director Date Greater Salt Lake Municipal Services District Official Date Approved As To Form UDOT Comptroller By By Comptroller’s Office Not For Signatures Date Date Consultant Services Federal Aid Agreement Review/Approval Routing Form State of Utah TODAY’S DATE 5/1/2019 Utah Department of Transportation PM REQUEST DATE 5/1/2019 Engineering Services Federal Aid Agreement no. Project No.: F-R299(309) PIN No.: 14398 PIN Description: FA-2234; Magna Bridge Replacments, 035031F 035033F FINET Prog Code No.: 54760 UDOT Project Manager UDOT Contract Administrator Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx (Acting as UDOT) 2010 South 2760 West XX Xxx 000000 Xxxx Xxxx Xxxx, XX 00000 Xxxx Xxxx Xxxx Xxxx 00000-0000 (000)000-0000 (000)000-0000 xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx Local Government Greater Salt Lake Municipal Services District 0000 X XXXXX XXXXXX Xxxx Xxxx Xxxx, XX 00000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, (000) 000-0000 XXXXXXXX@XXXX.XXX Project Value $2,000,000 Federal Match $1,631,525 Local Government Match $368,475 State Match $0 Not For Signatures
