Comparative Analysis. Section VII is dedicated to present a comparative analysis of the proposed solution. Here, the proposed scheme is compared with the work done by Xxx et al. [51], Xxxxxx et al. [53], Xxxxx et al. [42] and Xxxxx et al. [54].
Comparative Analysis. If Customer is utilizing Comparative Analysis, Vendor requires that the Customer meets Vendor’s requirements for a currently supported Operating System and a spatially accurate map. Vendor will have final approval in those requirements and specifications.
Comparative Analysis. Following receipt of responses (including oral presentations), and completion of evaluation of each eligible individual Quoter’s response, the Government may perform a comparative analysis (comparing Quoter responses to one another) to select the Quoter(s) that are best suited to fulfill the requirements, based on the Quoters’ responses to the factors outlined in this RFQ and their relative importance.
Comparative Analysis. Russia was the first country with whom the EU started a visa dialogue with the long term perspective of visa- free travel, but is not the only one. Most other VFAs also contain a reference to visa liberalisation, except the agreement with Cape Verde. For most of the Western Balkan countries, a visa-free regime is already in place and also with Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia concrete steps have been taken. The road toward the end-goal takes the same route for all these countries: all of the negotiations are centred around the same four blocks as we can find in the Common Steps. The start of the negotiations with the countries from the Western Balkan was made dependent on the fulfilment of technical reforms proposed by the Union, which took the form of a Roadmap. These lists of technical benchmarks were more or less the same for all the Western Balkan countries. With regard to the countries of the Eastern Partnership, the technical reforms were also grouped in a document and similarly divided into four blocks. But since the EU was reluctant to use the term of “Roadmaps” for these documents,478 because of the fact that the Western Balkans have a clear perspective of EU membership, another term was used. The lists of benchmarks receive the label of “Visa Liberalisation Action Plan” or VLAP.479 From the content of these Action Plans, it becomes clear the EU applies a different approach towards the East, compared to the Balkans. The EU opts for the reference to and the implementation of international norms, rather than EU norms. Since the countries of the Eastern Partnership are geographically part of Europe and members of the Council of Europe, the VLAPs refer to norms agreed upon within that context. Next to the four blocks, the VLAPs are also centred around a dual structure or a two phased approach: a first phase of legislative reforms and a second phase of more specific benchmarks. Also the content of the Blocks differs from the Roadmaps. Regarding Block 1, the VLAPs only refer to international norms and not to EU norms. Next to that, the benchmarks are more specific and far-reaching compared to the Roadmaps.480 Concerning the second block of illegal migration, the VLAPs make clear that any progress is conditional upon the implementation of the readmission agreement concluded with the third countries.481 Next to that, some extra measures must be taken, compared with the Roadmaps. Block 3 lists a number of standard adopted by certain international organisations...
Comparative Analysis. In the following lines a comparative between different programmes is done. As mentioned at the beginning of this section, in order to compare the programmes developed in this project with others implemented some years ago and well setted, two programmes have been taken into account: "Production technology and organisation Bachelor’s degree" from FH Joanneum and "Bachelor's Degree in Process and Product Innovation Engineering" at IMH. At the same time, in order to compare the most dualized possible Bachelor's programmes, from TUV only the “Naval Architecture and Marine Technology” programme will be taken into account. For comparative purposes, the following criteria were defined:
Comparative Analysis. ⚫ Owing to the cooperation, the quality menagement system hes been harmoniyed with the European standards, the procedure and the process of self- evaluation has been inproved. Larning otucomes and skills have been clearly defaned by each programme. The result is progress which is graphically showed. TEMPUS ECBAC 517200 ⚫ Although a Rulebook on International Mobility of Students and the Transfer of ECTS credits has been adopted by all the members of the Consortium, mobility is still difficult to implement due to the fact the Academy of applied studies has not been officially institucionalized. TEMPUS ECBAC 517200 ⚫ On March 6th 2015, a seminar on regional cooperation named “Profiling Higher Applied Education” organized by the Ministry of Education will take place in Belgrade. ⚫ One of the topics is establishing the Academy of Applied Studies. TEMPUS ECBAC 517200 23-26 February 2015. on Zlatibor, a seminar named “Development Trends” and a round table on master applied studies and the Academy of Applied Studies will take place. The Consortium members will take active part in this seminar, they will present their model of the Academy of Applied Studies and give their opinion on establishing the Academy. TEMPUS ECBAC 517200 ⚫ Thanks to the efforts of the representatives of the Consortium members in different expert teams of the Ministry of Education, there is constant pressure on The Ministry of Education with the aim of establishing the Academy: ⚫ PhD Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, director of VTS NIS, is a member of the Expert Team for defining the national framework of qualifications. ⚫ PhD Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, vice director of VTS NIS, is a member of the Expert HERE Team. TEMPUS ECBAC 517200 ⚫ With these activities the Consortium members of TEMPUS ECBAC 51720 project intend to prepare conditions for the legal framework for establishing the Academy of Applied Studies, whithin which they would continue with their cooperation which started with this project. TEMPUS ECBAC 517200
Comparative Analysis. The measure of impact our research is interested in is the change in population level health coverage. However, anticipated projections from the MoH was the only source of data we could obtain. Thus we wanted to test the validity of the projections by calculating our own estimates of population level coverage over time, and comparing our estimates to those proposed by the MoH. We used national documents of demographic and socio-economic indicators to estimate target populations and levels of health coverage within each target group. This exercise was applied to period of 2005 to 2011 and shows estimated trends in population coverage achieved by the different types of insurance schemes. Our intent was to establish whether the achieved coverage level within each scheme could be matched by its health financing contribution. To do this we created a table in which data on population coverage from the MOH was presented against our own estimates of coverage. For the sake of our analysis, we used the targets groups found across both sources of data and for which payer information on financial contribution could be found in the NHA dataset. While not considering the impact of new schemes may seem to underestimate overall population coverage, we focused on already well-implemented schemes in an attempt to test their impact. We suppose that the MoH data represents the “known” estimates we are trying to test against our “speculated” estimates. We conducted a sensitivity analysis on the “speculated” estimates to increase accuracy and provide upper and lower bounds. Lastly, we compared estimates of population coverage levels between the known and speculated numbers.
Comparative Analysis. A comparative case study of the four settlements – the Lower Pecos, the San Xxxx-Navajo, the Taos, and the Xxxxxx – revealed that although there are significant underlying differences, the agreements have surprising and significant commonalities. All four of the agreements are highly complex and address long-standing entrenched conflicts. They stem from water rights adjudication processes that have been ongoing for decades. The adjudications and associated settlement agreements involve thousands of diverse litigants and stakeholders with a wide variety of interests. Despite the fact that the four agreements were negotiated largely by local people in different basins with substantially different local characteristics and widely varying amounts of water, the overarching outcomes of the settlements are surprisingly similar. To provide some perspective, Table 2 lists some introductory statistics associated with each of the four case studies. Each of the case studies involves water rights adjudication litigation that was filed decades ago, is highly complex, and remains incomplete. All four involve settlement agreements that were signed within a few years of each other, although the length of time to negotiate each settlement varied widely. The basins vary greatly in size, population, and quantity of water involved. There are Native American lands in each of the basins, but only three of the settlements involve tribes. Correspondingly, although all four settlements require significant government funding, funding from federal sources is provided only for the three settlements involving tribes. Table 2. Basic Statistics Lower Pecos San Xxxx- Navajo Taos Xxxxxx Year Adjudication Filed 1956 1975 1969 1966 Number of Water Rights Claimants ~2000+ ~18,000 ~7,000 ~3,000+ Year Settlement Signed 2003 2005 2006 2006 Population of Basin (in 2000) 139,000 97,000 16,000 11,000 Area of Basin (square miles) 16,777 9,762 524 200 Available Water in Basin (AF/yr)* 125,000 1,100,000 68,000 7,000 Water Rights Settled (AF/yr)* 56,000 326,000 ~65,000 ~7,000 Number of Tribes in Basin 1 3 1 4 Number of Tribes Involved in Settlement 0 1 1 4 Federal Funding ** 0 $820M $120M $170M State Funding** $100M+ $25M $14M $50M Local Government Funding** 0 $30M 0 $62M Total Government Funding** $100M+ $875M $134M $282M * Available Water and Water Rights amounts are based on consumption, not diversion, and are rough estimates meant to allow comparison of the cases. ** Funding amounts are estimates as o...
Comparative Analysis. Customer shall not utilize the Software to perform any comparative analysis or benchmarking of the capabilities or functionality of the Software without the prior written consent of STS, which STS may withhold in its reasonable discretion, this prohibition shall not include parallel testing or use of any of the Customer’s business requirements in specifying a new product’s performance requirements.
Comparative Analysis. Several models were constructed to compare women who completed the program to women who did not at baseline. We attempted to construct models looking at demographic, physiological, and psychological measures. The first two models are concerning demographic information. In the first model we look at whether a participant completed the program and the hours worked. Overall, F=4.88 p=0.003, r2=0.06. We find that based on the model, on average, ADS is lower for women who did not complete the program and this value is even lower as the number of hours that the participant works increases. Table 4. Model Results: ADS and Hours Worked with Interaction Variable P xxxx xxxx Est SE t-valu e p -valu e Intercept 7770.06 1537.71 5.05 <0.001 Remove -3503.09 2363.56 -1.48 0.140 Hours Worked -364.59 341.33 -1.07 0.287 Hours Worked * Remove 1053.20 528.86 1.99 0.048
