Circuit. In addition, on December 29, 1999, the FCC granted in part five Issuer applications requesting additional channels in the following areas: Baltimore, New York, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C. On January 24, 2000, several parties filed petitions for reconsideration of each of these grants. The Issuer filed an opposition to these petitions which remains pending. In addition, on October 23, 1997, DCT Communications, Inc. filed a petition for reconsideration seeking revocation of the Issuer's license in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. The Issuer opposed the petition. On January 21, 1999, the FCC released an order denying DCT's petition for reconsideration. In response, DCT filed an application for review which the Issuer opposed. The FCC denied the application for review on February 22, 2000; however, DCT may seek review of the FCC's decision in the courts.
Circuit. “Circuit” shall mean the individual telecommunications facility included as part of the Digital I-Net Service.
Circuit. A telecommunications facility connecting two or more Customer locations.
Circuit. 14 The Commission sought voluntary remand of the SPP Attachment Z2 waiver proceeding in Docket Nos. ER16-1341-000 and ER16-1341-001, and the D.C. Circuit remanded the proceeding on July 31, 2018. On December 1, 2017, in Docket No. ER18-374-000, SPP filed modifications to its Attachment Z2 revenue crediting process that, along with other revisions to the Attachment Z2 process, required that transmission service and generator interconnection agreements “shall include a list of those upgrades associated with the agreement that are eligible for credits ….”15 On May 4, 2018, the Commission accepted SPP’s Tariff revisions, effective February 1, 2018.16 On March 27, 2018, in Docket No. ER18-753-000, the prior version of the AEP Agreement, designated as Twenty-Third Revised Service Agreement No. 1148 under SPP’s Service Agreements Tariff, was accepted by delegated authority.17 SPP filed the AEP Agreement with the Commission because the NITSA included terms and conditions that did not conform to the pro forma NITSA in the SPP Tariff.18
Circuit. BRNO This agreement made on the 11th day of January, 2016 BY AND BETWEEN
Circuit. Circuit" shall mean an individual telecommunications facility included as part of a Service.
Circuit. On February 29, 2012, the district court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, finding that these mandatory graphic warnings violated the First Amendment by unconstitutionally compelling speech. In so finding, the court issued a permanent injunction preventing the FDA from requiring the companies to implement new textual and graphic warnings until 15 months after the issuance of new regulations that are constitutionally permissible. The government filed a notice of appeal of this order with the Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit on March 4, 2012, and moved the appellate court to consolidate this appeal with the government’s appeal of the preliminary injunction decision. The Court of Appeals granted the government’s motion and heard argument on both appeals on April 10, 2012. On August 24, 2012, the Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit affirmed the District Court’s decision invalidating graphic warning regulation. The Court of Appeals denied the Government’s motion for rehearing en banc on December 5, 2012. The Government has until March 5, 2013, to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court. For a detailed description of the FDA Tobacco Act, see “— Governmental Activity” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in Part I, Item 2.
Circuit. 2. Existing aggregate generation capacity (in MW) interconnected to a substation/area bus, bank or circuit (i.e., amount of generation online) likely to serve the proposed Point of Interconnection.
Circuit. 4. Available capacity (in MW) of substation/area bus or bank and circuit likely to serve the proposed Point of Interconnection (i.e., total capacity less the sum of existing aggregate generation capacity and aggregate queued generation capacity).
Circuit. Local network access and transport facilities provided by PROVIDER exclusively in its serving territory. These circuits will be used to connect OMB locations to a central termination point located in The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to be determined by OMB.
