Circuit Clause Samples

Circuit. A telecommunications facility connecting two or more Customer locations.

Circuit. In addition, on December 29, 1999, the FCC granted in part five Issuer applications requesting additional channels in the following areas: Baltimore, New York, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C. On January 24, 2000, several parties filed petitions for reconsideration of each of these grants. The Issuer filed an opposition to these petitions which remains pending. In addition, on October 23, 1997, DCT Communications, Inc. filed a petition for reconsideration seeking revocation of the Issuer's license in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. The Issuer opposed the petition. On January 21, 1999, the FCC released an order denying DCT's petition for reconsideration. In response, DCT filed an application for review which the Issuer opposed. The FCC denied the application for review on February 22, 2000; however, DCT may seek review of the FCC's decision in the courts.

Circuit. Circuit" shall mean an individual telecommunications facility included as part of a Service.

Circuit. A methodology of implementing a telecommunication network in which two network nodes establish a dedicated communications channel (circuit) through the network before the nodes may communicate.

Circuit. Existing aggregate generation capacity (in MW) interconnected to a substation/area bus, bank or circuit (i.e., amount of generation online) likely to serve the proposed Point of Interconnection.

Circuit. 14 The Commission sought voluntary remand of the SPP Attachment Z2 waiver proceeding in Docket Nos. ER16-1341-000 and ER16-1341-001, and the D.C. Circuit remanded the proceeding on July 31, 2018. On December 1, 2017, in Docket No. ER18-374-000, SPP filed modifications to its Attachment Z2 revenue crediting process that, along with other revisions to the Attachment Z2 process, required that transmission service and generator interconnection agreements “shall include a list of those upgrades associated with the agreement that are eligible for credits ….”15 On May 4, 2018, the Commission accepted SPP’s Tariff revisions, effective February 1, 2018.16 On March 27, 2018, in Docket No. ER18-753-000, the prior version of the AEP Agreement, designated as Twenty-Third Revised Service Agreement No. 1148 under SPP’s Service Agreements Tariff, was accepted by delegated authority.17 SPP filed the AEP Agreement with the Commission because the NITSA included terms and conditions that did not conform to the pro forma NITSA in the SPP Tariff.18

Circuit. Select circuit and PWM method from the dropdown list. Example: #1 🡪 #2 [IO] If you enter [t=0sec, IO=0A] in #1 and [t=1sec, IO=150A] in #2, IO changes linearly from #1 to #2. Example: #3 🡪 #4 [IO, PF] If you enter [t=2sec, IO=150A] in #3 and [t=2sec, IO=50A] in #4, IO changes instantaneously from #3 to #4. A Linear change B Instantaneous change #2 #3 Select a cell or range of cell(s) 🡪 Right click 🡪 Copy Select cell(s) 🡪 Right click 🡪 Paste Select a line (click 1st column) 🡪 Right click 🡪 Copy Select a line 🡪 Right click 🡪 Paste

Circuit. Local network access and transport facilities provided by PROVIDER exclusively in its serving territory. These circuits will be used to connect OMB locations to a central termination point located in The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to be determined by OMB.

Circuit. 4 Avista filed its rehearing request as part of the “APX Market Participants” group, which also included BP and Tractebel. EXHIBIT D Enron Settlement Reserve Allocation of Enron Settlement Reserve Set Aside Specifically for Supporting Parties:1 Avista Energy, Inc. $ 257,749 Coral Power, LLC $ 548,641 Puget Sound Energy $ 401,580 Total For Supporting Parties $ 1,207,970 Allocation of Enron Settlement Reserve Set Aside for Enron Non-Settling Parties and Supporting Parties: Enron Non-Settling Parties $ 13,292,030 Including Supporting Parties Total Enron Settlement Reserve $ 14,500,000 1 Capitalized terms have the meaning set forth in the APX Settlement And Release Of Claims Agreement. In re: ) ) Chapter 11 Calpine Corporation, et al., ) ) Case No. 05-60200 (BRL)