Annexation Agreement. The proposed annexation agreement only pertains to the portion of the petitioners’ property that is located outside of the City (see Exhibit A). Separate cases for the rezoning and accessory structure variance will be brought forward for the portion of the petitioners’ property located inside the City. The agreement contains several provisions regarding the subject property: ▪ Zoning: The property will be rezoned from County AG-2, Agriculture to City R-2, Single-Family Residential upon annexation. This designation is consistent with the 2005 Urbana Comprehensive Plan which denotes the future land use for this area as Residential.
Annexation Agreement. Benefits of bringing the subject property into the City include future tax revenues, ability to ensure code compliance and safety, and to bring utilities further north to allow for future development. The annexation agreement states that the property will be rezoned to City IN (Industrial) upon annexation. According to Section IV-5 of the Urbana Zoning Ordinance, an annexation agreement is required if the proposed zoning is not a direct conversion from County zoning as stated in Table IV-1. Per Table IV-1, Table of Uses, a direct conversion from County B-4 (General Business) would result in City B-3 (General Business) zoning.
Annexation Agreement. Seller acknowledges that the annexation agreement for the Subject Property, currently contemplated by Purchaser with respect to the Subject Property, includes: an obligation to convey and/or dedicate a 50’ right-of-way on Xxxxx Road, a 25’ utility easement along Xxxxx Road, the acreage for a railroad right-of-way to the Xxxxx property, (which is subject to the City of Rochelle’s obligation to pay for the same at a price of $17,500.00 per acre), the 40’ roadway dedication on Xxxxxxx Road, the 70’ additional property for the overpass, (which is subject to the City of Rochelle’s obligation to pay for the same at a price of $17,500.00 per acre) and the 30’ utility easement located north of the overpass property and north of Xxxxxxx Road to the west line of the Xxxxx property. Purchaser expressly agrees that no re-zoning annexation or other activities of Purchaser with respect to the Subject Property shall be binding on the Subject Property, or Seller, unless Purchaser shall first waive all unfulfilled contingencies or conditions of this Agreement and proceed to Closing. Seller acknowledges that the Exchange Agreement and the related rider to the annexation agreement for the Exchange Property, currently contemplated by Purchaser with respect to the Exchange Property, includes: an agreement to dedicate the existing 40 foot right of way for Xxxxxxx Road to Xxxx County and a 25 to 30 foot easement for utilities to the City of Xxxxxxxx which utility easement shall be adjacent to and parallel with Xxxxxxx Road. In the event the Exchange Agreement Closes, and Seller becomes the Owner of the Alternative Ethanol Production Facility Land, then in that event, Seller agrees to dedicate the 40 foot right of way of Xxxxxxx Road to Xxxx County and a 25 to 30 foot easement for utilities to the City of Xxxxxxxx.
Annexation Agreement. That except as herein specifically set forth, the Annexation Agreement be and is hereby reinstated, readopted, ratified and affirmed.
Annexation Agreement. The applicant has submitted the Village’s standard Annexation Agreement and Staff is taking this opportunity to highlight Exhibit C.
Annexation Agreement. The annexation agreement states that the property will be rezoned to City R-4, Medium Density Multiple-Family Residential upon annexation. According to Section IV-5 of the Urbana Zoning Ordinance, an annexation agreement is required if the proposed zoning is not a direct conversion from County zoning as stated in Table IV-1. The annexation agreement also clarifies that the tract may continue to be used for agricultural cropping and related uses.
Annexation Agreement. [Sewer Service] THIS ANNEXATION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into this day of 200 , by and between the CITY OF OCOEE, a Florida municipal corporation, whose mailing address is 000 X. Xxxxxxxxx Xx., Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx 00000 (the “City”) and , whose mailing address is (the“Owner”).
Annexation Agreement. The owners are requesting annexation to obtain the benefits of city fire and safety protection services and to provide a more suitable zoning district consistent with the light industrial properties to the east. Benefits of bringing the subject property into the city include securing critical infrastructure with city fire and safety protection services, as well as the opportunity to extend an adjacent utility easement. According to Article IV-5 of the Urbana Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing at the Urbana Plan Commission is required if the proposed zoning is not a direct conversion from County zoning as stated in Table IV-1, County to City Zoning Conversion, which requires a direct conversion from County R-2 Single Family Residence to City R-2 Single Family Residential zoning. The annexation agreement states that the property will be rezoned to City IN-1 Light Industrial/Office upon annexation and includes a 10-foot utility easement to be granted along the north property line to extend a similar easement from the adjacent lot (Exhibit E). The annexation agreement would allow the applicant to continue to operate the existing sanitary sewer infrastructure as it has done for the past 46 years. In addition, it would require the applicant to grant a ten (10) –foot utility easement along the north property line which extends an existing ten (10) –foot utility easement on the easterly-adjacent industrial property. Based on the applicant’s intended uses of the property, the current uses and zoning of surrounding properties, the designation of the property as “Residential” serving “Residential” and “Light Industrial” in the 2005 Urbana Comprehensive Plan, and the application of the “La Salle criteria,” it was determined that the most appropriate zoning for the property would be City IN-1 Light Industrial/Office. The Urbana Plan Commission held a public hearing on the proposed zoning amendment at their February 9, 2017, meeting. City staff presented the case and answered questions from the Plan Commission regarding the proposed rezoning upon annexation of the property from County R-2 to City IN-1. Discussion focused on the UCSD’s ability to operate the existing sanitary sewer infrastructure and perform necessary repairs on it if the rezoning to IN-1 was not granted. Following the public hearing, the Plan Commission voted to recommend approval by a vote of 6 ayes and 0 nays.
Annexation Agreement. Last year the petitioners’ septic system failed and they needed an emergency connection to the Urbana-Champaign Sanitary District sewer system. In order for properties in Urbana’s extra- territorial jurisdiction to establish a new connection to the UCSD sewer system, the applicant must agree to annex to the City of Urbana. The Urbana City Council passed a motion on July 21, 2008 to request the UCSD allow the emergency connection prior to the approval of an annexation agreement. The proposed agreement includes a provision to rezone the property to bring it into conformance with the 2005 Urbana Comprehensive Plan.
