Xxxxxxxx et al. Case No. 4:18-cv-00113-CDP, or any cases consolidated into that action; (ii) any claims by any governmental entity that arise out of any governmental investigation of Defendants relating to the conduct alleged in the Action; or (iii) any claims relating to the enforcement of the Settlement. “Released Plaintiffs’ Claims” include “Unknown Claims,” as defined herein.
Xxxxxxxx et al. Case No. 91-5195 WMB filed --------------------------------------------------- in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the "Revlon Litigation"), the Modified Plan of Rehabilitation for Executive Life Insurance Company ("ELIC Rehabilitation Plan"), the annuity contracts such PBH Employees received from Aurora pursuant to the ELIC Rehabilitation Plan ("Aurora Annuities"), group annuity contract number CQ00123 ("CQ00123"), or otherwise. The rights of Seller and the portion of the PBH Plan transferred to Seller (or one of the Seller Affiliates) under this provision shall include, but shall not be limited to, the right to receive reimbursement of (i) shortfall amounts advanced by Seller, PBH, and/or the PBH Plan, or any of them, during the conservatorship of Executive Life, which may be reimbursed by payments from Revlon, by guaranty payments from NOLHGA and/or by payments of "Account Value Increments" (as such term is defined in the ELIC Rehabilitation Plan) from the various enhancement trusts established under the ELIC Rehabilitation Plan, and (ii) amounts advanced by Seller, PBH, and/or the PBH Plan, or any of them, prior to Executive Life's conservatorship with respect to benefits then payable under CQ00123, but for which pay status did not commence in a timely fashion due to administrative delays. Neither Purchaser, Purchaser Affiliates (including PBH), nor Acquired Subsidiaries shall have any right to receive from Revlon, Executive Life, Aurora, or NOLHGA, or any of their successors in interest, any payment or reimbursement with respect to any such obligations. In the event that Purchaser and/or PBH shall receive any such payment or reimbursement, Purchaser immediately shall notify Seller of such event and shall, within three (3) days from receipt, pay the amount so received to Seller or such other person as Seller shall specify in writing to Purchaser and/or PBH. Furthermore, Purchaser and/or PBH shall have no right of reimbursement or contribution from Seller or the portion of the PBH Plan transferred to Seller, or their successors, or any of them, with respect to any amounts that Seller or the portion of the PBH Plan transferred to Seller, or their successors, or any of them, or PBH Employees, their beneficiaries and successors, or any of them, may receive with respect to any such obligation. Notwithstanding the above, Seller shall be fully responsible for any and all costs and expenses (including legal fees) of PBH,...
Xxxxxxxx et al. 2017). The DEX-R is a brief measure of executive functioning, including subscales for each of the four domains of PFC function delineated by Xxxxx and colleagues (2007; 2011b), specifically energising, executive cognitive, emotion and behavioural self-regulation, and meta-cognition. Both self- and informant-rated versions offer good test-retest reliability, r = .88 and r = .60 respectively, and internal consistency, Cronbach’s α = .89 (Hellebrekers et al., 2017).
Xxxxxxxx et al. 2012; Polanczyk et al., 2010). As further hypothesised, parent-reported child difficulties were related to parent anxiety and depression. These results were consistent with previous findings (x.x. Xxx & Xxx, 2005). Increased child difficulties may cause parents to experience increased affective disturbance. Alternatively, parents that appraise their child’s difficulties more negatively may be more likely to appraise their own difficulties more negatively, directly resulting in increased mood difficulties, and/or making it more likely that parents will self- report a mood difficulty due to their negative bias. Consistent with the cognitive perspective on depression, researchers have argued that depressed mothers’ perceptions of their childen’s behaviours are negatively distorted (x.x. Xxxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx & Xxxxxxx, 1986). However, others propose that depressed mothers are accurately reporting their children’s behaviour (Xxxxxx & Xxxxxx, 1989; Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxxxx, 1989). It is not clear if the current results reflect the inaccuracy of parent reports (i.e. a ‘depression distortion’), or the association between difficult child behaviours and depressed mothers more negative response style. Parental burden is a 1 These are data that aren’t too far from the standard deviations, but have a strong influence on parameter estimate (Xxxxxx, 1976). major reason for child mental health service use, and this burden is predicted by child symptomatology and parent mental health problems (Xxxxxx et al., 1998). It is likely that the high levels of parent depression and child difficulties indicate high levels of parent burden in the current sample of help-seekers. Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxx (1999) highlight that depressed parents are characterised by negative perceptions of their children, and difficulties interacting with their children. The relationship between parents’ depression and children’s problem behaviours may be mediated by negative interactions between the parent and child, indicted by high EE. In support of this hypothesis, Xxxxx and Xxxxxxx (1997) report that both maternal depression and the associated negative impact on family relationships may contribute to mothers negatively biased reports. Xxxxxx et al. (2003) also found support for the hypothesis that criticism might act as a mediator between parent mood and child difficulties. Future research with bigger samples is warranted, to test this potential mediational relationship. Levels of EE were not associated with t...
Xxxxxxxx et al. On February 15, 2018, Plaintiffs challenged the then existing policies of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, and exemplar of which for Harvoni® is attached as Exhibit A, that resulted in the denial of medically necessary treatment—direct-acting antiviral (“DAA”) drugs, including Harvoni®, and/or other drugs to treat Hepatitis C—for Plaintiffs and other Medicaid beneficiaries infected with the Hepatitis C Virus (“HCV”). The action, brought by Plaintiffs in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, sought injunctive relief both on their own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals.
Xxxxxxxx et al. United States District Court for the District of Kansas, Case No. 5:18-cv-4008-DDC-GEB.
Xxxxxxxx et al. (Civ. No. 02-4106, N.D. Cal.), and shall not be cited as precedent in any other legal proceeding.
Xxxxxxxx et al. ). In the Low Countries, logically, there is emphasis on the management of floods. Climate change is expected to cause an increase in the occurrence and intensity of flooding risk, local flood- ing from extreme rainfall, and droughts. In this article we focus on climate adaptation and particularly flood manage- ment in Flanders and the Netherlands, which are among the most vulnerable parts of Europe when it comes to increasing flood risk (EEA ). The central research question in this article is: how has adaptation been framed and ‘translated’ into governance practices in Dutch and Flemish flood management and how has this framing influenced changes in governance organization and practices? Based on earlier extensive research on discursive and institutional change in flood doi: 10.2166/wcc.2014.018 management in Flanders and the Netherlands, we illustrate the importance of framing in explaining the capacity of flood management arrangements to adapt to new challenges. In doing so, this article seeks to explain recent policy choices on climate adaptation in flood management.
Xxxxxxxx et al. (Case No. 4:13-cv-01763), and one in Delaware Chancery Court, Xxxxxx v. Crestwood
Xxxxxxxx et al in the federal District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Case No. 2:23-cv-01697-SCD (the “Lawsuit”).
