Conclusions and Next Steps. This document provides a thorough review of the state of the art in trust modelling, covering both human and machine aspects as well as trustworthiness by design approaches. We have described the trust aspects of 4G networks through defining the actors and business models and their consequences for trust. We note that there is no formal specification of trust in 4G networks to report on or build upon. Looking to the future we have documented the new actors and business models expected in 5G networks including the consequences of virtualisation, new domains and tighter integration of satellite and HAPS systems. This is followed by an analysis of the majority of the 5G use cases defined in 5G-ENSURE D2.1 where in each case the entities and trust issues are enumerated. Taking all this into account we have discussed the role of privacy in 5G and propose an approach to modelling trust in 5G networks, extending the state of the art. This “draft” trust model document contains a large amount of documentation and analysis. The 5G use case analysis will be completed and the entirety will then be combined with further information from various sources to analyse the architecture and potential risks in more detail: the CAPEC database [Mitre-3] of known attacks to ensure that a broad range of known malicious attacks is modelled; deliverable D2.4 “Security architecture (draft)” and 5G architecture documents from elsewhere for details on generic 5G stakeholder roles and technology asset types once they are determined. The results of the analysis will then be captured in a machine understandable form, and algorithms defined for quantification of trust (and trustworthiness) going beyond the simple ones proposed in this report. All of these results will then feed into the development of security architecture in WP2, also trust enablers in WP3, as well as the specification of the full 5G-ENSURE trust model in Deliverable D2.5 which will include an analysis of the 5G-ENSURE trust enablers.
Conclusions and Next Steps. 33 List of Tables Table 1 Communities that ESCAPE aims to engage with 7 Table 2 ESCAPE components building the “EOSC cell” 8 Table 3 ESCAPE events organised during Y1 14 Table 4 ESCAPE events planned from Y2 onwards 14 Table 5 ESCAPE events planned from Y2 onwards 15 Table 6 Events where ESCAPE was showcased 16 Table 7 ESCAPE final event motivation (draft) 17 Table 9 Main aspects of ESCAPE communication and outreach efforts 18 Table 10 ESCAPE internal tools for project management 19 Table 11 ESCAPE Social Media Channels 21 Table 12 Relevant hashtags used by stakeholders to be used in targeted tweets 22 Table 13 ESCAPE Audience Twitter Handles (examples) 22 Table 14 ESCAPE Audience LinkedIn groups 23 Table 15 ESCAPE Communication Material 24 Table 16 Media Channels 25 Table 17 ESCAPE Dissemination KPIs 26 Table 18 ESCAPE Synergies established by Y1 29 Table 19 Results exploitation depending on the ESCAPE services considered 30 List of Figures Figure 1 ESCAPE Citizen Science logo 9 Figure 2 ESCAPE Data Infrastructure for Open Science logo 10 Figure 3 ESCAPE Science Analysis Platform 11 Figure 4 ESCAPE Open-source Scientific Software and Service Repository logo 11 Figure 5 ESCAPE Virtual Observatory logo 12 Figure 6 ESCAPE Website Home Page 20 Figure 7 Sample of ESCAPE tweets 21 Figure 8 ESCAPE LinkedIn Profile (left) and post (right) 23 Figure 9 ESCAPE YouTube Home Page 24 Figure 10 ESCAPE WP6 timeline of activities 26 Figure 11 How ESCAPE is working to deliver the EOSC Thematic Cell 32 Glossary Term Explanation ASTERICS Astronomy ESFRI & Research Infrastructure Cluster ASTRON The Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy CNRS Centre national de recherche scientifique CTA Cherenkov Telescope Array CS Citizen Science EGO European Gravitational Observatory ELT Extremely Large Telescope ESCAPE European Science Cluster of Astronomy & Particle Physics ESFRI research infrastructures ESFRI European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures EST European Solar Telescope EOSC European Open Science Cloud FAIR Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, reusable FAIR Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research H-LHC High Luminosity LHC IVOA International Virtual Observatory Alliance KM3NeT Cubic Kilometre Neutrino Telescope XXXX Laboratoire d’Annecy de Physique des Particules JIVE Joint Institute for VLBI XXXX MPE Mass participation experiment SKA Square Kilometre Array WP Work Package PROJECT SUMMARY ESCAPE (European Science Cluster of Astronomy & Particle physics ESFRI researc...
Conclusions and Next Steps. This document sets the framework for best disseminating and exploiting the ESCAPE results to the defined targeted audience. Ensuring a consistent dissemination and exploitation plan to the stakeholders as well as among users is of foremost importance. Collaboration among project partners for sharing of result and building on dynamicity and adaptability are key words for successful project dissemination and exploitation. Some of the key elements established by the present document are: ESCAPE shall develop a vibrant community of astronomy, astroparticle and particle physics members. This will be achieved with the core services and values that the ESCAPE platform will actively communicate; Each Partner of the ESCAPE Consortium will leverage on their valuable network to contribute to effective implementation of the plan described in the present document; The impacts of ESCAPE communication activities will be monitored continuously, by means of a set of measurable KPIs, which have been indicated in the present document;
Conclusions and Next Steps. Xxxxxxxx from the analysis of the innovation background and the supply-chain descriptions in this document, in the next period the Stakeholder Analysis will start and a through validation phase will be completed with the industrial partners within the consortium, to use this market framework for assessing the potential of the project and produce a complete technology and business study, via a knowledge-based intelligence.
Conclusions and Next Steps. The established processes and lexicons are acceptable for use of evaluating soymilk and tofu. Moving forward, the GFTC will be incorporating the above suggestions from the Japanese collaborators into their soymilk and tofu production to refine their techniques. References Xxxxxxx X.X. and Xxxx X.X. 1996. Aroma and Flavor Lexicon for Sensory Evaluation. ASTM Data Series Publication DS 66.
Conclusions and Next Steps. D8.3 presents a new approach to CW-SEIT based on an extensive review of V1.0, an updated analysis of the cyber risk landscape and direct interaction with SMEs, which have little understanding of the risks they are facing, let alone the resources to implement a risk management strategy. CW-SEIT V2.0 fills this important gap by offering a tool that is more pragmatic and business-friendly compared with V1.0. While this requires new software development for delivery of the tool in July 2017, the new version also strengthens the WISER go-to-market strategy by guiding the user on cyber risk management and the CyberWISER service packages, as defined in D2.3. CW-SEIT also supports the portability to other verticals in WP7 through the collection of data on potential customers in Q1-4 of the questionnaire. At the same time, we include references to our glossaries and guides available in different partner languages and also features of the WISER cartography to help businesses comply with the GDPR in terms of notification to competent authorities. In fact, an important feature of the CW-SEIT V2.0 is helping EU businesses prepare for the new regulation, where risk management assumes even greater relevance. Another value-add of D8.3 comes from the wealth of independent insights gathered from the analysis, including the case studies that illustrate the wide range of potential socio-economic impacts. These insights are presented in business-friendly terms and can now be used as core messages for WISER communication tools, from the website and social media, to promotional material and press kits, as defined in D8.6. Next steps include: • SW enhancements start mid-June for rollout in late July 2017. During this time, WISER will create a dedicated page for SMEs on the importance of cyber risk management with selected insights and teasers for the tool extracted from this report. • Upon rollout, WISER will embark upon a major promotional campaign, spanning its SME network, SMART social media campaigns, a press release, requests for support from business associations and cyber security clusters. o This activity will continue through to November 2017. • The rollout of the final cartography in July (D6.10) as an opportunity to package this tool, the translated glossaries and guides, and CW-SEIT in special campaigns around getting ready for GDPR linking both the importance of risk management and the requirement to report to competent authorities, the details of which are provided ...
Conclusions and Next Steps. This deliverable serves as a reference document for the design, interface specification, and preliminary evaluation of core TeraFlow OS components, touching upon important areas of modern network operating systems, including (i) scalable high-performance SDN control plane, (ii) heterogeneous SDN hardware integration, (iii) service and OS lifecycle automation, and (iv) network slice management.
Conclusions and Next Steps. 45 5.1. Conclusions from test results 45 5.2. Implications for the globally scalable archive federation technology architecture 46 5.3. Major challenges 49 5.4. Next steps 49 ANNEX A. GLOSSARY 52 ANNEX B. SCALABILITY TEST PLAN 58 B.1. Abbreviations and Acronyms 58 B.2. Partners 58 B.3. Assumptions and Limitations 58 B.4. Scalability Implications of User Requirements 59 B.4.1 Safe Replication Requirements 59 B.4.2 Dynamic Data Replication Requirements 59 B.5. Software Test Plan 60 B.5.1 Namespace Scalability Tests 60 B.5.2 Write Rate Scalability 61 B.5.3 Read Rate Scalability 61 B.5.4 Scalability in terms of number of concurrent open files 62 B.5.5 Upper limit on concurrent connections 62 B.5.6 Scalability of Concurrent Read/Write Operations 62 B.5.7 Absolute File Size Limitations 63 B.5.8 Federation Tests 63 ANNEX C. DETAILED TEST RESULTS 64 C.1. Namespace Scalability Tests by Site 64 C.2. Concurrent Write Tests by Site 68 C.3. Concurrent Read Tests by Site 71 C.4. Concurrent Combined Read and Write Tests by Site 74 ANNEX D. SITE INFRASTRUCTURE DESCRIPTION 77 D.1. DKRZ 77 D.2. JSC 78 D.3. XXXX 00 X.0. XXX 00 X.0. STFC 79 D.6. UiO 80 ANNEX E. SCALABLE METADATA ARCHITECTURES 82 E.1. Introduction 82 E.2. EUDAT Community Requirements 82 E.3. Information User Landscape 83 E.4. Current Federated Metadata Catalogues 84 E.5. Scalability Issues 85 E.6. Central Archive Model 85 E.7. Distributed Metadata Service 86 E.8. Tiered Metadata Service 88 E.9. Cached Metadata Searching 89 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Remote and Local Access to Data 11 Figure 2: WLCG Architecture 18 Figure 3: Map of Europe showing PaNdata partners 20 Figure 4: Design Goals for Spanner 22 Figure 5: Stress Testing Results for iRODS iCAT Server 24 Figure 6: XrootD Software Architecture 25 Figure 7: Oldb B64-Tree Architecture 26 Figure 8: Federation using HTTP based on WLCG Work 27 Figure 9: Federation Island B 34 Figure 10: Comparison of write rates between native and iput protocols 35 Figure 11: Comparison of write rates between native and iput protocols (exc DKRZ and STFC) 35 Figure 12: Write Performance of Each Test Site Using Native Protocol 37 Figure 13: Read Performance Variability with Number of Threads 39 Figure 14: Results of Concurrent Read/Write Operations (Read Threads) 40 Figure 15: Results of Concurrent Read/Write Operations (Write Threads) 41 Figure 16: Transfer Time as a Function of File Size (Native Protocol) 42 Figure 17: Transfer Rate as a Function of File Size (Native Protocol) 4...
Conclusions and Next Steps. The IVOA interoperability meeting was a successful second milestone for CEVO. The ESCAPE project was very visible at this international interoperability meeting, and progress was made in a number of priority areas for the ESFRI and other research infrastructures, in particular in relation to radio astronomy. The next IVOA interoperability meeting will be held in Sydney, Australia May 4-8, 2020. A CEVO Technology Forum event (Feb 4-6, 2020) will prepare for the ESCAPE input to this next meeting. We expect that the ESCAPE Progress Meeting (February 2020), and other CEVO specific meetings will also provide important input for the preparation of the next IVOA meeting milestone.
Conclusions and Next Steps. The workshop has provided valuable feedback on the draft narratives, enabling them to be refined, improved and finalised. No formal evaluation questionnaire was used to elicit feedback on the workshop, but several participants noted that they had found it useful – and that the set of narratives had helped them to think about future possibilities for the energy system in their own countries. There were no clear negative reactions to the set of narratives as a whole.
