Resources and Capabilities. SUPPLIER shall commit the necessary resources and capabilities in order to achieve the Quality Performance Targets set out in section 2.4 within each relevant year. SUPPLIER acknowledges that the final goal is to reach and maintain a Sigma levels as specified in Purchase Agreement between Vestas Wind Systems A/S and Zoxxxx Xompanies Inc. appendix 2 of this QA agreement and will continuously commit the necessary resources and capabilities in order to reach this goal. Performance Dialog Meetings In order to support the continuous improvement of the Product(s), VESTAS and SUPPLIER shall meet to discuss the performance of the Product(s) and any improvement hereof. Both VESTAS and SUPPLIER shall ensure that the relevant people with the right competences participate in such meetings.
Resources and Capabilities. CDPHE utilizes trained environmental professionals to review voluntary cleanup applications. The specialty of these individuals may vary, but includes: geology, hydrology, engineering, risk analysis, and chemistry. These environmental professionals have applied this expertise to UST remediation, RCRA corrective action, solid waste facility permitting, and Superfund remedial action. On an as-needed basis, the appropriate expertise can be utilized to assist the State's lead reviewer. The maximum number of applications which can be reviewed per month is set by statute, in order to insure that authorized staff have sufficient time to review applications in sufficient detail. Standards and Risk Analysis CDPHE will implement a risk-based cleanup approach based on the proposed land use and will utilize applicable standards and remediation objectives in cleanup decisions. CDPHE will take under consideration site-specific cleanup standards if they are based on risk and utilize appropriate land use assumptions. Although a site-specific risk assessment prepared using EPA'S RAGS document can be submitted by the applicant at his/her option, the 45 day time period available for review of an application containing such a risk assessment may be insufficient and need to be extended. Therefore, CDPHE will use relevant standards derived from applicable statutes, regulations, guidance, and the application of the risk-derived numbers developed by EPA, CDPHE or other governmental entities. In all cases, an analysis of the risk entails an evaluation of targets and receptors and the potential for pathways of exposure to be realized. In all application evaluations, the CDPHE reviewers will examine the proposed cleanup standards, the proposed remedial method and the proposed land use in concert to ensure that protection of health and the environment is achieved by the implementation of the cleanup plan. Public Participation The Act has no requirements for public participation or review of applications. However, all files are public documents and available for public review upon request. Also, CDPHE routinely contacts the local health department to see if there is any knowledge of or interest in the site, and will make a copy of the application available for local review if requested. Local governments may have additional public participation requirements related to the redevelopment of property (i.e., zoning hearings) which are applicable to these sites.
Resources and Capabilities. The Accomplishment Summary must include a brief discussion of the competing continuation applicant’s accomplishments during the previous grant cycle (September 1, 2013 – August 31, 2017), including A list of the competing continuation applicant’s successfully completed HWRC research studies or technical assistance initiatives by funding year. A list of peer-reviewed publications relating to the competing continuation applicant’s completed HWRC work. The status of the competing continuation applicant’s incomplete HWRC research studies or technical assistance initiatives, including: o Year funded o Work completed during each of the budget years since the HWRC research study or technical assistance initiative was funded o Barriers to progress and steps taken to overcome the barriers o Realistic timeline for completion of the study or initiative, including major milestones o Presentations or peer-reviewed publications based on partially completed work A short summary of the positive contributions to the field of health workforce research as a result of previous HWRC funding.
Resources and Capabilities. May include an assessment of current and future staff levels and qualification and contracting capabilities and needs. Governance – May discuss the progress made toward establishing the Exchange’s administrative structure (Territorial agency, quasi-governmental agency, or non-profit organization) and governance structure (composition of governing body, conflict of interest standards, selection process). If an Exchange is expected to be Territory-run, planning could include determinations of where the Exchange would reside, what the governing structure would be, and to what departments or officials it would be accountable. If an Exchange is expected to be established through an independent entity, planning could include the development of the governance structure and mechanisms of accountability. If the Territory is planning to coordinate with other Territories for a regional Exchange, planning could involve activities relating to coordination with other Territories to establish an Exchange, determine markets, and ensure licensure and consumer protections could be developed. It may be possible to use or leverage existing governance bodies established for other purposes and meeting Exchange requirements, including for the Territory’s health information exchange program. Finance – May include pathways to developing accounting and auditing standards, mechanisms of transparency to the public, and procedures to facilitate reporting to the Secretary. Technical Infrastructure – May include plans to conduct a gap analysis in information technical needs. In this section, the applicant must address how the Exchange will carry out due diligence in assessing the applicability of the system models developed by ―Early Innovator‖ States. The gap analysis might also include plans for integration of Health Information Exchange standards for program interoperability, as well as steps necessary to ensure a modular, flexible approach to systems development including use of open interfaces and exposed application programming interfaces; the separation of business rules from core programming; and the availability of business rules in both human and machine readable formats. Business Operations – May include plans for a web portal and call center, eligibility determinations, plan qualification, plan bidding, application of quality rating systems and rate justification, and risk adjustment. Providing assistance to individuals is a priority of the Exchange. Therefore, the proposal ...
