Method of Evaluation Sample Clauses

Method of Evaluation. Using the data compiled during the grant, the Grant Director will complete theFinal Evaluation” section in the fourth/final Quarterly Performance Report (QPR). The Final Evaluation should provide a brief summary of the grant’s accomplishments, challenges and significant activities. This narrative should also include whether goals and objectives were met, exceeded, or an explanation of why objectives were not completed.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Method of Evaluation. (a) The Independent Expert’s assessment shall include the method of evaluation elements set out in the Dispute Context.
Method of Evaluation. In all cases of promotion or transfer of nurses from one classification to another, the following factors shall be considered:
Method of Evaluation. Academic evaluations will be designated on the Assignment and Work Record and are incorporated herein. Other acceptable methods of evaluation include, but are not limited to: Teacher Made Tests, Student Conferences, Progress/Report Cards, Chapter/Unit Tests, Work Samples, Observations, Portfolios, State Standards Testing, Learning Journals, Presentations, Quizzes, Labs, Finals. Students are required to report to their teacher as scheduled: Xxxxxx of Reporting: One−on−One, Small Group, Email, Fax. Time: . Day: . Frequency: At least once a month. Duration: one semester. Location: School Site or Other Public Location. Voluntary Statement It is understood that independent study is a continuously voluntary educational alternative and that a classroom option is always available at the student's home district. Instruction may be provided for a student through independent study only if the student is offered the alternative of classroom instruction. Assignments: According to the district or charter school policy for grades K through 12, the maximum length of time allowed between when the assignment was made and the date the assignment is due is 20 school days, unless an exception is made in accordance with the district or charter school policy. After 3 missed assignments, as per board policy, an evaluation will be made to determine whether independent study is an appropriate strategy for this student. Additional courses may be added to this agreement as needed if the agreement is re−signed and re−dated by the teacher and the student. Signatures and Dates: I have read and I understand the terms of this agreement, and agree to all provisions set forth. Student Signature: Date Parent/Guardian/Caregiver Signature: Date Supervising Teacher Signature: Date Other Signature: Date Other Signature: Date Other Signature: Date Other Signature: Date River Oaks Academy Acknowledgement of Responsibilities Student: Student Number: Address: Location: 1st Phone Number: DOB: Beginning Date: Students Agreement/Responsibilities Contract Term: Semester 1 (Fall) Year: 2013 − 2014 2nd Phone Number: Grade Level: 08 School for Classroom Option:
Method of Evaluation. 1. With the consent of the teacher and the evaluator, informal observation(s) alone will suffice for employees with permanent status who have consistently demonstrated satisfactory performance for an extended period of time.
Method of Evaluation. The evaluator is to complete the CONFIDENTIAL EVALUATION by rating the teacher’s performance on each of the items in Section B and making recommendations in Section C. Each “Unsatisfactory” rating requires that the evaluator complete a JOB TARGET REPORT, specifying what the teacher should do to overcome that particular inadequacy. For a “Needs to Improve” rating, the JOB TARGETS REPORT is optional unless requested by the teacher. The JOB TARGET REPORT form is intended primarily to supplement the CONFIDENTIAL EVALUATION, as described above. However, if the evaluator observes a single area of unsatisfactory performance which needs immediate correction, the JOB TARGET REPORT may be used to cite the deficiency and to give instructions for correcting the problem. Administrators are encouraged, as the performance issues may dictate, to meet informally with a teacher before issuing a job target.
Method of Evaluation. A combined oral and written exam with the participation of an external examiner. The written part of the exam consists of a dissertation of 100 pages, written in Danish or English with a summary in English. A normal page for written submissions is 2400 characters. To calculate normal pages, text is included, but not the front page, table of contents, bibliography, appendix, figures and models. The dissertation must be submitted to the supervisor in 4 printed copies. The oral part is public (exemptions from this cf. the Examination Executive Order, section 19, subsections 2 and 3). The supervisor announces the time and place of the examination in agreement with the student. In the assessment of the thesis dissertation importance will mainly be attached to its scientific content, but the student’s spelling and formulating capacity will also form part of the assessment, irrespective of the language of the thesis. At the oral exam the student will have 30 minutes in which to present the project. The examiner and the external examiner may then ask the student questions for up to 30 minutes whereupon the grade will be determined and announced. The thesis dissertation and the oral exam will be assessed jointly, using the Danish 7-point grading scale. The examiner and the external examiner subsequently prepare a written assessment.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Method of Evaluation. A. The evaluation system and forms shall be uniform throughout the district and involve the following conditions:
Method of Evaluation. Evaluation Method: (e.g. parent record, teacher judgment, review of student work, test, other {describe})
Method of Evaluation. Mandatory requirements are evaluated on a simple pass or fail basis. Failure by bidders to meet any of the mandatory requirements will render the bidder’s proposal non-responsive. The treatment of mandatory requirements in any procurement process is absolute. Proposers must meet all the mandatory requirements described below. This will be evaluated as either “Yes” or “No”. Proposals not receiving “Yes” for any mandatory requirement will not be considered further.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.