Intended Outcomes. Establish a process to develop and maintain a produce farm inventory. • Plan, establish, and/or enhance state and territory produce safety programs. • Coordinate with other local, state, territory, and federal agencies for produce safety activities. • Formulate a multi-year plan to implement a produce safety system. • Develop a performance measurement system, plan and/or process system to measure the progress towards the goals of this cooperative agreement. • Evaluate produce legislative or regulatory authority. • Develop and/or provide education, outreach, and technical assistance to jurisdictional produce safety regulators. • Design and implement a compliance program for produce safety regulations at the jurisdictional level. • Advance efforts for a nationally integrated food safety system. • Plan, establish, and/or enhance state and territory produce safety programs. • Encourage the safe production of fresh fruits and vegetables. • Promote understanding and compliance with the requirements of the Produce Safety Rule. Program Metrics • Current program funding: $27.135M • Current number of awards: 48 State Produce CAP Awardees (FY2020) Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arkansas Arizona California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Mexico New Jersey New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Wisconsin West Virginia Have you seen our Blog? FDA Voice
Intended Outcomes. 5.1 The establishment and implementation of this Intergovernmental Agreement is intended to promote the following outcomes for eligible infants and toddlers and their families: • Families and their eligible children attain functional outcomes that reflect their priorities, routines, relationships, resources, and concerns; • Families access comprehensive, coordinated, culturally-appropriate early intervention services as determined by the IFSP team; • Families are actively involved in all aspects of AzEIP implementation; and • Families are knowledgeable about and exercise, as appropriate, their procedural rights and safeguards.
Intended Outcomes. It is agreed that the potential benefits from cooperation among the State departments include the following:
Intended Outcomes. After successfully completing this program, the student will be able to perform the following:
Intended Outcomes. Educators: • Bring previously taught lessons with student products and work in collaborative groups to examine the lesson objective, formative assessment strategies implemented and student feedback gathered using a Data Analysis protocol • Learn the purpose and power of feedback • Experience new formative assessment strategies to immediately take back to the classroom • Understand the difference between a mistake and an error in learning and why knowing the difference effects designing student work • Underscore the why, how, and what of formative assessment.
Intended Outcomes. To assist jurisdictions through facilitation of long-term improvements and advancement of the Retail Program Standards. To help state, local, tribal, and territorial retail food regulatory programs achieve conformance with the Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards (VNRFRPS). Program Metrics Retail Program Standards Grants, Year 4: Applications Received: 667 Applications Scored: 519 Grants Awarded: 435 Funding Awarded: $1,962,986 Breakdown of 435 Grants Awarded: Self Assessments: 88 grants, $220,000 Verification Audits 1 Standard: 21 grants, $42,000 Verification Audits 2 or More Standards: 27 grants, $81,000 Custom: 41 grants, $119,425 Moderate Projects: 56 grants, $966, 942 Training: 182 grants, $488,078 Food Protection Task Force: 20 grants, $45,542 Jurisdictional Level: Local: 383 State: 49 Tribal: 2 Territorial: 1 FDA Region: Southeast: 85 Southwest: 131 Northeast: 45 Central: 115 Pacific: 59 Program Accomplishments (first 3 years of funding) 127 self-assessments of all 9 Program Standards 68verification audits of one or more Standards 1143 employees who have received direct training Jurisdictions used funds to complete Risk Factor Studies, develop & implement electronic inspection systems, enhance inspection and complaint forms, enhance existing software to improve data collection, tracking and reporting, and to develop and implement learning management systems. Have you seen our Blog? FDA Voice
Intended Outcomes. Our aim in Portsmouth is to ensure the following outcomes for Local Healthwatch; Evidence based activity, led by local intelligence Stronger relationships with the public, private and community sector representatives across the city to support good information flow and allow for effective challenge The social value of Healthwatch activity Stronger local voice – with attention to the varying levels of health need in Portsmouth and a clear understanding of local circumstance and geography Highly visible and accountable in the local community, which is understood and trusted by local people as a source of information and support Also drawing on the information outlined in this document
Intended Outcomes. 8.2.1 The establishment and implementation of this IGA is intended to promote the following outcomes for eligible infants and toddlers and their families: • Families and their eligible children attain functional outcomes that reflect their priorities, routines, relationships, resources, and concerns to assist their children to engage and participate in everyday routines and activities; • Families access comprehensive, coordinated, culturally-appropriate early intervention services as determined by the IFSP team; • Families are actively involved in all aspects of AzEIP implementation; and • Families are knowledgeable about and exercise, as appropriate, their procedural rights and safeguards.
Intended Outcomes. Success Measures This scheme will contribute to the following key BCF metric: a) Reduction in non-elective admissions. The following measures that link to the Hillingdon outcomes framework for older people will also be used to identify whether the scheme is working: Increase in utilisation rates for Connect to Support (new and repeat users); Contributing towards a 5% reduction in falls-related non-elective admissions on 2016/17 outturn; % of users of Adult Social Care who have found it easy or difficult to access information and advice about services and/or benefits (test through the Adult Social Care Survey); Proportion of patients (among all those with a XXX score) whose XXX score has improved in the last 12 months. % of people aged 55 and over participating in screening programmes.
Intended Outcomes. Success Measures This scheme will contribute to the following key BCF metric: Reduction in non-elective admissions. The following measure that links to the Hillingdon outcomes framework for older people will also be used to identify whether the scheme is working: Proportion of people on an end of life pathway on CMC who achieved their preferred place of death.
