Future Considerations. The parties shall continue to address mutual interests. As these interests are reduced to contract language, they will become part of the collective bargaining contract through the regular procedures.
Future Considerations. Recent national consultations on a variety of community safety related topics may lead to future changes in legislation or statutory guidance. The Government is currently undertaking a Victims Bill consultation which aims to build on the foundations provided by the Victims Code to improve victims’ experiences within the criminal justice system. Some of the areas being looked at include community based support services and advocacy support. The Government has also been consulting on a proposed new Protect Duty, as a result of terror attacks in public spaces, such as happened at the Manchester Arena and other smaller scale attacks; with the aim to consider security measures at publicly accessible locations and the support needed from Government. In addition, following the introduction of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 the Government has sought views on draft Domestic Abuse Statutory Guidance to support the implementation of the Act with guidance and support to frontline professionals and sharing of best practice. Partnership Changes and Challenges
Future Considerations. It is anticipated by Histogenics and ABM that there may be a need to expand the use and deployment of the Technology in the future, depending upon the development of the Histogenics business. These expansions will be negotiated diligently by the parties, acting reasonably and in good faith and this agreement will be appropriately amended in the future to address such future needs.
Future Considerations. There is still a great deal of work to be accomplished. Several factors, including the ending of a financial grant in 2019, are pushing the timeline for this project. The church will have to decide to pursue the Mosaic or not in the next few months. The Mosaic Church Campus would provide some financial relief and assist with facility management while not requiring the congregation to give up the buildings entirely. However, it will take a significant shift in congregation’s thinking about the building so they can let go of the past, see the move as a positive step for the Kingdom instead as a loss for Ebenezer, and a develop an attitude of willingness to share resources with churches of other denominations. Additionally, all of the buildings and property of the church is currently held as collateral for the mortgage. The church will have to refinance the mortgage through renegotiation with the current lender, a new vendor, or consider selling church bonds in order to change that. Any change in the church mortgage will require church and conference approval. An openness to move forward on the refinance will be an indicator of the church’s readiness to proceed with the Mosaic Church Campus. The above are major hurdles. It is my hope to complete the refinancing of the mortgage by the summer of 2019. Simultaneously, I will work with the Board leadership to educate the congregation on the possibility of the Mosaic project, allow them time to process and ask questions during several congregational meetings, and to approve the pursuit of creating a Mosaic Church Campus for the Kingdom of God on earth. After the mortgage is refinanced, the church will need to establish a statement of core values that will be a baseline for developing a partnership with other churches. The statement will include an expected shared theology, an understanding of the relationship, and the boundaries of acceptance. Using this set of Core Values, I will encourage the church to begin the search for partners by visiting International Theological Seminary Xxxx Dr. Xxxx Xxxxx in Atlanta, Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxx with the Stone Mountain Baptist Association, Xx. Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx of the North Georgia United Methodist Church –Church Development Committee, the Southeast Conference of the United Church of Xxxxxx, the African Methodist Episcopal Church, and several local pastoral groups. It will be necessary to identify the partners before the process can proceed. Once partners have been identified there wil...
Future Considerations. At T. 639, Xx. Xxxxxxx is most concerned about what he terms "future concessions" noting that: "CSOSPA was silent on the cost or availability of power after 2005, leaving the issue of West Kootenay's rights and rates open to argument at that time. In the new agreement West Kootenay acknowledges it has no rights after 2005, other than to purchase power at market, if an agreement can be reached. And that at least provides some benefit to Cominco in terms of clarification." His summary at T. 640 includes the following: "The bottom line of the municipal intervenors is that this Commission should protect the residual power and keep it available in this community and in the service area should the disaster situation evolve. Second, the Commission should do what it can to clarify now the costs with respect to Brilliant and Xxxxxx expansion, costs which we would submit should be on a historic-cost basis. There is no point in leaving that matter out alone for future discussion and future reference."
Future Considerations. How is a proposal for a subsea injection structure (no new production) made and approved under the model form JOA? – Can such a scenario be proposed as a subsequent Development Phase and a subsequent Development System? • A development System includes a Production System and its associated Facilities.
Future Considerations. How is a proposal for a new subsea production structure and a new subsea injection structure that is to be placed under an existing Platform made and approved under the current JOA? – Is this a Subsequent Development Phase? • Can Operator propose production and injection system under a single proposal? – Non-consent from only new xxxxx? • Proposed as a Subsequent Development Phase and a separate Enhanced Recovery Project (12.11) – Remember drag along – How do the separate phases benefit from the injection system? • Situation 3 – Company A non-consents a subsequent development system, which includes injection and production (aka Phase 2) – The injection from Phase 2 will benefit Production xxxxx from initial phase (aka Phase 1) Legend Enhanced Recovery Non-Consent Spar/FPS Production Template Injection Template Wellpath (Production) Wellpath (Injection) Proposed • Result : – Is Company A’s interest in Phase 1 Production well that benefits from injection immediately forfeited and applied to Phase 2 NC penalty? • New Subsea Production and Injection Scenario – If proposed together as a Subsequent Development System, and the non-consenting party is in the initial system – does his penalty apply to his production from the initial system? – If subsea injection is proposed separately under 12.11, but benefits one system over another, non-op is still dragged along? – Should an operator be allowed to “game the system” in choosing how the proposal should be made? • How is a new subsea production structure (for drilling and producing one or more Development Well(s)) that is to be placed under an existing Platform proposed/approved under the current Deepwater JOA? – Is this matter a subsequent Development System proposal under Article 12.9 (Subsequent Development Phases)? – Is this subsea production structure an “additional Facility” to be approved pursuant to Article 14.5 (Approval of Additional Facilities)? • Note - Operator proceeds, if Operator decides that there is no interference – Is this an Expansion or Modification of an Existing Production System? • What about the drilling template (see- Production System definition)? – Is this a Major Modification to the Development Plan? • What is “installation of the Development System?” • Major modifications generally require unanimous consent Background and Definitions Non-Consent New Injection System and Xxxxx –No New Production New Injection System and Xxxxx –New Production
Future Considerations. Pair-offs As a result of unclear business requirements / support, Rehypothecation has been removed from the document. If a clear business need arises, this can be revisited in the future. Inclusion of ISO20022 business process modifications and format recommendations
Future Considerations. It is the wish of the donor for the Fund to be funded annually. At any point in time, this fund may be converted to an endowed scholarship fund at the request of the donor with a gift that will bring the minimum corpus value to $10,000.00.
Future Considerations. The goal of any strategic plan is to map out the future direction for the Fire Department. Over the next ten years there will be items that will need to be discussed with the Riverside County Fire Department and with City Council in order to better serve the needs of the community and the needs of firefighting personnel. These items include: ♦ Construction of a training/drill tower ♦ Four person staffing ♦ Paramedic squads ♦ Dividing the City into two battalions ♦ Riverside County Fire Department fire apparatus lease program CONSTRUCTION OF A TRAINING/DRILL TOWER The Xxx Xxxxx Training Center, located at 00000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx in Riverside, is a regional training center for both law enforcement agencies and fire departments. The drill tower at this location is a regional training tower serving not only the Riverside County Fire Department but also the students at Xxxxxx Valley College. When utilizing the training tower, three fire apparatus are out of service in the City due to the distance they would need to travel from the Xxx Xxxxx Training Center back to Xxxxxx Valley to respond to an emergency call for service. A local training tower would allow fire apparatus to stay within the city limits of Xxxxxx Valley for multi-company training and be available to respond to emergencies. Furthermore, training could be scheduled more frequently for City personnel. Being able to drill on a daily or weekly basis is an important component of building an effective and efficient fire ground operation for when a fire emergency occurs. The main benefit to being able to train more frequently for high rise emergencies is that it raises the level of safety for fire personnel. Additionally, they are able to provide a more organized response to high hazard incidents which can ultimately affect the outcome of the emergency situation. Having a training tower located in Xxxxxx Valley has been recognized in the City’s Capital Improvement Project (CIP) budget since 1992 when the Fire Chief at the time requested its construction as part of the ten year CIP with construction to begin in Fiscal Year 1998–99. Due to financial considerations, and the size of property that would need to be purchased to accommodate a joint fire station and drill tower, the fire department has continuously deferred this project. However, with the pending land acquisition in the south end of the City of 4.78 acres, there is now not only the appropriate land size available but also the location is ideal as it ...
