Evaluation Appeal Process Sample Clauses

Evaluation Appeal Process. Instructional employees may appeal using an expedited appeal procedure limited to 2 steps: Step 1 - Final Evaluation Appeal and Step 2 - Arbitration. The Arbitration step will be an expedited process with no submission of briefs and the arbitrator will issue a written decision. Expedited Arbitration will include setting a panel of mutually agreed upon and available arbitrators to hear multiple cases in a day. Although we are using an expedited arbitration process, each side retains the right to use all remedies available to them under state and federal law. If a serious procedural violations results in the removal of an annual evaluation, the evaluation rating will default to Not Evaluated and the employee will be considered to have an overall Effective rating for the purpose of all Human Capital and salary decisions.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Appeal Process. A. If a "Does Not Meet Standards" rating is received, the employee has the following choices:
Evaluation Appeal Process. Employees may appeal using an expedited appeal procedure limited to 3 steps: Step 1, Step 2, and Arbitration. The Arbitration step will be an expedited process with no submission of briefs and the arbitrator will issue a written decision. Expedited Arbitration will include setting a panel of mutually agreed upon and available arbitrators to hear multiple cases in a day. Serious procedural violations may result in the removal of an annual evaluation and the evaluation rating will default to the student achievement rating.
Evaluation Appeal Process a. There shall be an appeal procedure for an unsatisfactory or needs improvement Overall score on the performance evaluation of the negotiations unit member.
Evaluation Appeal Process. A. The parties recognize that solid work performance should be achieved and that work below that level should be addressed during the evaluation period. To the extent practicable, an employee who receives a “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” or their subsequent equivalent ratings (“Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory”) will have been informed of issue(s) and necessary improvements with regard to his or her work performance during the evaluation period. If an overall performance rating of "Unsatisfactory” or “Needs Improvement" is received, the employee may request a ninety (90) calendar day re-evaluation period which shall not be unreasonably denied. The re-evaluation period shall be ninety (90) calendars days in length. An employee shall have his/her reevaluation done at the end of the ninety (90) calendar day period to determine if a "Solid Performance" rating has been achieved. If an employee receives a “Solid Performance” evaluation during the re-evaluation process, he or she shall be prospectively eligible for the denied Step and/or salary increase effective from the date of receiving the "Solid Performance" rating. Employees shall retain their anniversary date for Step purposes regardless of their rating during the evaluation or re-evaluation process.
Evaluation Appeal Process. A. Appeal Overview
Evaluation Appeal Process. Instructional employees may appeal using an expedited appeal procedure limited to 3 steps: Step 1, Step 2, and 2 steps: Step 1 -
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Appeal Process a. During the summative evaluation conference all evaluators shall discuss the written summative evaluation report so that all points of view will be reflected. The teacher shall receive a copy of all evaluation documents included in the Evaluation Plan. At the teacher's option, the teacher may appear before the evaluators, with Union representation if requested, to discuss the final evaluation report within five (5) school days after receipt of the summative evaluation report.
Evaluation Appeal Process 

Related to Evaluation Appeal Process

  • Appeal Process PROVIDER may appeal any adverse finding by the Contract Compliance Officer as set forth in sec. 25.08(20)(c), D.C. Ords.

  • Classification Appeal Procedure An employee shall have the right to appeal, through the Union, the classification of the position the employee occupies, or where a point rating plan has been used, the right to appeal the position's level. Classification matters are not grievable under Article 8 of this Agreement. Instead, the following procedures shall be followed.

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement to provide specificity to the statutory obligations established under sections 3319.111 and 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code and to conform to the framework for the evaluation of teachers developed under section 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code.

  • Evaluation Procedures 7.2.1 Evaluation procedures designed to fairly and adequately assess performance of full- time faculty employees shall be established and reviewed annually by the Vice President, after consultation with appropriate faculty groups at divisional/departmental meetings for their recommendations.

  • Appeal Procedure The Appeal will be deemed an appeal of the entire Arbitration Award. In conducting the Appeal, the Appeal Panel shall conduct a de novo review of all Claims described or otherwise set forth in the Arbitration Notice. Subject to the foregoing and all other provisions of this Paragraph 5, the Appeal Panel shall conduct the Appeal in a manner the Appeal Panel considers appropriate for a fair and expeditious disposition of the Appeal, may hold one or more hearings and permit oral argument, and may review all previous evidence and discovery, together with all briefs, pleadings and other documents filed with the Original Arbitrator (as well as any documents filed with the Appeal Panel pursuant to Paragraph 5.4(a) below). Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with the Appeal, the Appeal Panel shall not permit the parties to conduct any additional discovery or raise any new Claims to be arbitrated, shall not permit new witnesses or affidavits, and shall not base any of its findings or determinations on the Original Arbitrator’s findings or the Arbitration Award.

  • Appeal Procedures A. Employees may appeal discipline imposed under this LOA through the Dispute Resolution Procedure contained in the Collective Bargaining Agreement (i.e. grievance procedure) or to the Minneapolis Civil Service Commission.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Review and Appeal (a) Each Party shall establish or maintain judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative tribunals or procedures for the purpose of the prompt review and, where warranted, correction of final administrative actions regarding matters covered by this Treaty. Such tribunals shall be impartial and independent of the office or authority entrusted with administrative enforcement and shall not have any substantial interest in the outcome of the matter.

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.