Design Review and Recommendations Sample Clauses

Design Review and Recommendations a) The Construction Manager shall familiarize himself thoroughly with the evolving architectural, civil, mechanical, plumbing, electrical and structural plans and specifications and shall follow the development of design through Contract Documents. The Construction Manager shall make recommendations with respect to the selection of systems and materials, and cost reducing alternatives including assistance to the Architect-Engineer and Owner in evaluating alternative comparisons versus long term cost effect. The evaluation shall speak to the benefits of the speed of erection and early completion of the project. The Construction Manager shall furnish pertinent information as to the availability of materials and labor that will be required. The Construction Manager shall submit to the Owner and Architect-Engineer such comments as may be appropriate concerning construction, feasibility, and practicality. The Construction Manager shall bring to the Owner and the Architect-Engineer’s attention any apparent defects in the design, drawing and specifications, or other documents. The Construction Manager shall prepare an estimate of the construction cost at appropriate milestones during the design and shall evaluate such estimate with the project budget. The Construction Manager shall recommend cost saving alternatives, as appropriate, at each design milestone. At each design milestone the Owner, Architect Engineer and Construction Manager shall conduct a value engineering review.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Design Review and Recommendations. (1) Review and Recommendations and Warranty - Contractor shall familiarize itself thoroughly with the evolving architectural, civil, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and structural plans and specifications and shall follow the development of design from preliminaries through working drawings. Contractor shall make recommendations with respect to the selection of systems and materials, and cost reducing alternatives including assistance to the Architect-Engineer and Owner in evaluating alternative comparisons versus long term cost effects. The evaluation shall speak to the benefits of the speed of erection and early completion of the project. Contractor shall furnish pertinent information as to the availability of materials and labor that will be required. Contractor shall submit to the Owner, Permitting Authority, if necessary, and Architect-Engineer such comments as may be appropriate concerning construction feasibility and practicality. Contractor shall call to the Project Manager's and the Architect-Engineer's attention any apparent defects in the design, drawings and specifications or other documents. Contractor shall prepare an estimate of the construction cost utilizing the unit quantity survey method. CONTRACTOR’S WARRANTY: AT COMPLETION OF CONTRACTOR'S REVIEW OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, EXCEPT ONLY AS TO SPECIFIC MATTERS AS MAY BE IDENTIFIED BY APPROPRIATE COMMENTS PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANT, WITHOUT ASSUMING ANY ARCHITECTURAL OR ENGINEERING RESPONSIBILITY, THAT THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE CONSISTENT, PRACTICAL, FEASIBLE AND CONSTRUCTIBLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANT THAT THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE VARIOUS BIDDING PACKAGES IS CONSTRUCTIBLE WITHIN THE SCHEDULED CONSTRUCTION TIME. OWNER’S DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY: THE OWNER DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTY THAT THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PROJECT ARE ACCURATE, PRACTICAL, CONSISTENT OR CONSTRUCTIBLE.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
Design Review and Recommendations. 1. The XXXX shall participate in all design review meetings with the Owner that may be scheduled. For each design submittal, the XXXX shall review the design documents for clarity, consistency, constructability, construction feasibility and practicality, and identification of errors, omissions, conflicts and apparent defects and coordination of documentation.
Sample 1Sample 2
Design Review and Recommendations. Developer shall supervise, coordinate, and otherwise facilitate and familiarize itself thoroughly with the evolving Preliminary Plans and Specifications and the Plans and Specifications and shall direct and closely follow the development of such documents from preliminary design through working and construction documents. Developer shall make recommendations to Architect and Architect’s Consultants with respect to the selection of systems, materials, and cost reducing alternatives (including assistance to County in evaluating alternative comparisons versus long term cost effects, and value-engineering). Such evaluation shall be directed to the benefits of the speed of erection and early completion of the Project. Developer shall furnish to County pertinent information in connection with the availability of materials and labor that will be required for the Construction Work. County’s failure to notify Developer that such alternative comparisons are not acceptable within thirty (30) days following receipt of such pertinent information from Developer shall be deemed to constitute the County’s approval of such alternative comparisons. Developer shall prepare or cause to be prepared by qualified cost estimators an estimate of the Construction cost utilizing the unit quantity survey method.
Sample 1
Design Review and Recommendations. A. Review and Recommendations and Warranty - The DESIGN-BUILD FIRM's construction personnel shall familiarize themselves thoroughly with the evolving architectural, civil, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and structural plans and specifications and shall follow the development of design from Phase I through Phase II. They shall make recommendations to the designers with respect to the selection of systems and materials, and cost reducing alternatives including assistance to the OWNER in evaluating alternative comparisons versus long term cost effects. The evaluation shall speak to the benefits of the speed of erection and early completion of the project. They shall furnish pertinent information as to the availability of materials and labor that will be required. They shall call to the DESIGN-BUILD FIRM's designer's attention any apparent defects in the design, drawings and specifications or other documents. They shall prepare an estimate of the construction cost utilizing the unit quantity survey method.
Sample 1
Design Review and Recommendations. Without assuming liability for the design of the PROJECT, the XXXX during Phase I – Construction Services for Design Phase, shall familiarize itself thoroughly with the evolving architectural, civil, mechanical, plumbing, electrical and structural plans and specifications and shall follow the development of design from schematic design through Construction Documents. The XXXX shall make recommendations with respect to the PROJECT site, foundations, selection of systems and materials and cost reducing alternatives, including assistance to the ENGINEER and the CITY REPRESENTATIVE in evaluating alternative comparisons versus long‐term cost effects as the PROJECT Team deem appropriate. The XXXX shall furnish pertinent information as to the availability of materials and labor that will be required. The XXXX shall submit to the CITY REPRESENTATIVE, the Permitting Authority and the ENGINEER(S) such comments in writing as the XXXX and the CITY REPRESENTATIVE may deem appropriate concerning construction feasibility and practicality. The XXXX shall call to the CITY REPRESENTATIVE and ENGINEER’s attention any apparent defects in the design, drawings and specifications or other documents that it notes.
Sample 1
Design Review and Recommendations 
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (15)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Design Review and Recommendations

  • Manufacturer's Recommendations All work or materials shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and requirements. The Contractor shall obtain the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements, for its use at the Site in executing the Work, copies of bulletins, circulars, catalogues, or other publications bearing the manufacturer’s titles, numbers, editions, dates, etc. If the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements are not available, the Contractor shall request installation instructions from the Design Professional.

  • Conclusion and Recommendations D. Evaluations for Offenders without a sex offense conviction shall answer the following additional referral questions in the evaluations:

  • Ongoing Review and Revisions As set forth in Section 35.7, the Parties have agreed to the coordination and exchange of data and information under this Agreement to enhance system reliability and efficient market operations as systems exist and are contemplated as of the Effective Date. The Parties expect that these systems and the technology applicable to these systems and to the collection and exchange of data will change from time to time throughout the term of this Agreement. The Parties agree that the objectives of this Agreement can be fulfilled efficiently and economically only if the Parties, from time to time, review and, as appropriate, revise the requirements stated herein in response to such changes, including deleting, adding, or revising requirements and protocols. Each Party will negotiate in good faith in response to such revisions the other Party may propose from time to time. Nothing in this Agreement, however, shall require any Party to reach agreement with respect to any such changes, or to purchase, install, or otherwise implement new equipment, software, or devices, or functions, except as required to perform this Agreement.

  • Personnel File Review a. A unit member has the right upon his/her own request to review the contents of his/her personnel file. The review will be conducted in the presence of the administrator, or his/her designee, responsible for the safekeeping of such file. The employee may have a committee person assist in said review. Such review shall be conducted at a mutually agreeable time. A copy of requested material will be provided.

  • Design Review At appropriate stages of design, documented reviews of the design results shall be planned and conducted. Participants at each Design Review shall include representatives of all functions concerned with the design stage being reviewed, as well as other specialist personnel, as required. Records of such reviews shall be maintained. Any computer software used to perform alternative calculations or verify clearances through the use of scale models or computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) techniques shall be validated before the use of the application, with validation documented in accordance with Section 2.2.15. In addition, at each submittal to IFA for review, Developer shall provide hand calculations that validate any calculations performed by computer software.

  • Conclusions and Recommendations The demonstration and evaluation process provided an opportunity to test community specific tools with a range of end users from the memory institution domain and to gain greater insight into both the current and future evolution of the SHAMAN prototypes for preservation, access and re-use. Xxxx et al. (2000) in their user evaluation study of the Alexandria Digital Library which incorporated the evaluation of a Web prototype by earth scientists, information specialists and educators raised four key questions in relation to their findings that SHAMAN may be well advised to consider, they are paraphrased here with our conclusions from the investigations. What have we learned about our target organizations and potential users?  Memory institutions are most definitely not a homogenised group; their needs and requirements differ greatly across the domain.  Representatives of the archives community are agreed on the benefits of SHAMAN‟s authenticity validation function.  The representatives of government information services remained unconvinced as to the need or benefit of grid technologies or distributed ingest while librarians saw the value of grid access as an asset of the framework. What have we learned about the evaluation approach for digital preservation?  Within the limits of the exercise, in terms of time-frame and resources, the approach adopted has generated useful information for the further development of demonstrators and for the development of the SHAMAN framework overall. What have we learned about the SHAMAN ISP1 demonstrator?  Respondents to the evaluation questionnaires and the focus groups indicate that, overall, the presentation of the demonstrator worked effectively and that, in general, participants in the demonstration and evaluation events were able to understand the intentions of the demonstration and to apply the ideas presented to their own context. What have we learned about the applicability of the SHAMAN framework to memory institutions?  Respondents to the questionnaires and participants in the focus groups readily identified the value of the SHAMAN framework to their own operations. The majority had not yet established a long-term digital preservation policy, but recognized the need. Generally, the concepts of distributed ingest and grid operations found favour.  Virtually all practitioners in the focus groups, however, drew attention to need of a lower level demonstration that would be closer to their everyday preservation troubles, especially for digital preservation to be applied to non-textual materials, such as film, photographs and sound archives. In addition to the criteria suggested by Xxxx et al., we can add a further project-related question: What have we learned that has implications for the training and dissemination phase of the Project?  It was not part of the remit of the demonstration and evaluation specifically to discover information of relevance to the training and dissemination function. However, a number of factors will affect the efficacy of any training programme in particular. o First, no common understanding of digital preservation can be assumed of the potential target audiences for training. Consequently, it is likely that self-paced learning materials will be most effective in presenting the SHAMAN framework. o Secondly, the aims of SHAMAN as a project must be conveyed clearly: specifically, that it is a kind of „proof-of-concept‟ project and is not intended to deliver a package of programs capable of being implemented by institutions. o Thirdly, it needs to be emphasised that the SHAMAN framework is not limited to text documents; it can be applied to materials of all kinds. However, the demonstrations relate to bodies of material that were actually available for use. o Fourthly, the existing presentation materials are capable of being adapted for use in training activities. o Finally, the target audiences will appreciate the possibility of online access to the demonstrator, which will need to have very great ease of access in order that people with diverse backgrounds are able to use it with equal facility. We believe that, overall, WP14 has met its aims and objectives in this demonstration and evaluation of ISP1. Valuable lessons have been learnt by all parties involved, which will be transferred to the evaluation of ISP2 in the coming months.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • REGULATORY FILINGS AND CAISO TARIFF COMPLIANCE 3.1 Filing

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.