Design Review. Consumer shall provide Holy Cross an electrical one-line diagram and a relaying and metering one-line diagram prior to completion of detailed designs, unless the Consumer is installing a packaged system that is pre-certified to IEEE 1547.1 and UL 1741 standards. Packaged systems pre-certified under IEEE Standard 1547.1 and UL Standard 1741 will not require a relaying and metering one-line diagram. The submitted application and diagrams will be processed, reviewed, and acted upon in accordance with the Holy Cross Interconnection Policy.
Design Review. At appropriate stages of design, documented reviews of the design results shall be planned and conducted. Participants at each Design Review shall include representatives of all functions concerned with the design stage being reviewed, as well as other specialist personnel, as required. Records of such reviews shall be maintained. Any computer software used to perform alternative calculations or verify clearances through the use of scale models or computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) techniques shall be validated before the use of the application, with validation documented in accordance with Section 2.2.15. In addition, at each submittal to IFA for review, Developer shall provide hand calculations that validate any calculations performed by computer software.
Design Review. The plans and specifications for each New Project shall be subject to Licensor’s review and, upon reasonable notice, inspection to ensure that they are in compliance with Brand Standards (subject to Project-specific variations to the Brand Standards that may be agreed to by the parties) and with Licensee’s obligations hereunder in accordance with the Design Review Addendum, the form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit G, and each such Project shall be submitted to Licensor’s design review process for review, comment, and approval. Licensee shall pay (or cause to be paid) to Licensor or its Affiliate a fixed fee for such review activities in accordance with the Design Review Addendum. Licensee agrees that, as between Licensee and its Affiliates on the one hand and Licensor and its Affiliates on the other hand, Licensee and its Affiliates (and not Licensor and its Affiliates) are responsible for: (i) ensuring that any design, construction documents, specifications, and any work related to the Projects complies with all Applicable Laws, including any requirements relating to disabled persons; (ii) any errors or omissions; or (iii) discrepancies of any nature in any drawings or specifications. Licensee further acknowledges and agrees that: (a) any review by Licensor or its Affiliates of plans for any Project is limited solely to determining whether the plans comply with the Brand Standards; and (b) Licensor and its Affiliates will have no liability or obligation with respect to the construction, conversion, renovation, upgrading or furnishing of the Projects other than as set forth in the Design Review Addendum.
Design Review. Developer acknowledges and agrees that in reviewing and approving documents under this Section, Agency is acting as a legal entity separate and distinct from the City and that Agency’s actions in this regard are separate and distinct from the City’s conduct of its typical governmental functions and exercise of its police powers in its governmental capacity.
Design Review. 1. The County shall submit elevation or relocation schematics with details to SHPO, who will then have thirty (30) days for review and comment. The County will consult with the SHPO to incorporate the recommended changes into the elevation or relocation documents.
Design Review. DRPT will design and aesthetically treat any elements of the Project, as illustrated in Appendix A, introduced into NPS-administered properties to be compatible with the character of existing resources and appropriate for the context of Washington DC’s Monumental Core
Design Review. Reviews conducted with and approved by all applicable personnel to assure that the development is progressing according to plan.
Design Review. The design and materials of any improvements to the Property are subject to review and approval by the City of Norfolk Architectural Review Board (the “ARB”). No later than sixty (60) days after Buyer receives a fully executed copy of this Agreement, Buyer shall submit the proposed design of any improvements to the Property to the ARB. If Buyer wishes to make modifications to the design of the Project as approved by the ARB, Buyer shall submit such proposed modifications to the ARB for review and approval. Any such submission shall clearly identify all changes, omissions and additions as compared to the previously approved Project design documents. If the ARB determines, in its reasonable judgment, that the proposed modifications are not acceptable, the Seller shall so notify Buyer, specifying in reasonable detail in what respects such proposed modifications are not acceptable, and Buyer shall either (a) withdraw the proposed modifications, in which case construction of the Project shall proceed on the basis of the Project design previously approved by the ARB, or (b) revise the proposed modifications in response to the ARB’s objections and resubmit such modifications to the ARB, within thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice of objections, for review and approval. Buyer shall submit plans to the City’s Department of Planning and Community Development (a) when the design is approximately 10% complete, (b) when the design is approximately 30% complete, (c) when the design is approximately 60% complete, and (d) when the design is sufficiently complete such that Buyer’s contractor can proceed with construction (the “Final Plans”). The City’s Planning Director, or his/her designee, shall review the design submissions for the Property. Buyer may not proceed with construction until the Final Plans for the Property are approved by the Department of Planning and Community Development and, in order to enforce this Section 7, the Seller shall be entitled to seek injunctive relief without the necessity of showing monetary or special damages and without posting bond or security for a bond for the award of a permanent injunction. Review by the Department of Planning will include confirmation that the design at the 60% stage and the Final Plans are in substantial conformance with the previous plans approved by ARB or properly modified in accordance with this Agreement.
Design Review. Immersion is entitled to conduct periodic design reviews to ensure its satisfaction with the Services. Upon reasonable notice, KLSI shall allow Immersion during normal business hours, to visit its places of business for development and manufacturing to discuss and inspect the status of the development of the Product.
Design Review. 10.1 In reviewing projects under this Agreement, the Design Review Board (“DRB”) will use the recently-adopted, site-specific design guidelines that supplement the Capitol Hill Neighborhood Design Guidelines, in addition to any other applicable guidelines. The recommendation of the DRB shall be consistent with this Agreement, but if there is a conflict between a DRB recommendation and the terms of this Agreement, the latter shall control.
