CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. The cost−share agreement shall contain or describe:
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. 3.1 The Parties agree to establish a Working Time Account within the meaning of the Working Hours Act. Employees can use the Working Time Account to bank up to 60 hours of their flexitime balance over a reference period of four (4) months under this Agreement.
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. 5.1 Composition of the Board of Directors and replacement of its members The Parties acknowledge that, by resolutions adopted on 1 October 2013 and 4 November 2013, the Shareholders’ Meeting of the Company has appointed, with effect from the date of beginning of trading of the Shares on the Mercato Telematico Azionario (Electronic Stock Market) and until the date of the Shareholders’ Meeting called to approve the financial statements at 31 December 2015 (the “Expiry Date”), a Board of Directors made up of 11 members, designated as follows: • 6 members, of which 2 directors having the independence requirements provided by the TUF, designated by Xxxxxxx Partecipazioni; • 3 members designated by ECIP M; • 1 member designated by CEP III; and • 1 member, having the independence requirements provided by the TUF, jointly designated by ECIP M and CEP III. The Agreement provides that:
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. 5.1. The details of the services that will be provided are described at the XXXX Law School Page of the XXXX Law School that you are applying to. While all care has been taken for this information to be up-to-date, the Organising Committee reserves the right to reasonably amend the services provided.
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. This Consortium Agreement and its annexes shall constitute the entire agreement among the Participants in respect of the present Collaborative Research Project, and supersede all previous negotiations, commitments and documents concerning the Collaborative Research Project including any memorandum of understanding among the Participants (whether or not with others) which relates to the present Collaborative Research Project or its proposal to ERA-CAPS. Controlling provisions The Participants guarantee that nothing in the present Consortium Agreement is contrary to the conditions defined by their Partner of ERA-CAPS for the financing of their research. In case of inconsistency between the different elements composing this Consortium Agreement, the provisions contained in the main text of this Consortium Agreement shall prevail over those contained inside annex 1 “IPR Conditions” which shall also prevail over those of annex 2.
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. The agreement must have been to pursue a course of conduct that would involve the commission of the principal offence (Crimes Act 1958 s321). The prosecution must prove that the course of conduct agreed upon would involve the commission of the principal offence, rather than some different offence, or an unspecified or undecided offence (X x XxXxxx and Xxxxxx [1983] 2 VR 419; X x Xxxxxx CCA Vic 29/09/1980; X x Xxxxx & Xxxxxx [1999] 2 VR 87). Where the prosecution is based on a conspiracy to traffick in a specified drug, but the evidence establishes that the agreement related to a different drug, the conspiracy will not have been proven (DPP v Xxxxxxx & Ors (Ruling No. 7) [2007] VSC 579). This element will usually not be met in cases where the evidence only establishes that the accused agreed to commit an offence of a certain class (such as a violent offence). In such cases, the jury will often be unable to exclude the possibility that the agreement was to commit a different offence within that class, rather than the principal offence (X x XxXxxx and Xxxxxx [1983] 2 VR 419; X x Xxxxxx CCA Vic 29/09/1980). The agreement does not need to have specified who the particular victim would be, or how the offence would be carried out. There merely needs to have been an agreement to commit the principal offence (X x Xxxx and Xxxxx (1818) 2 B and Ald 204; X x Xxxxxxxx (2009) 22 VR 93). Where an agreement contemplated multiple criminal acts, the jury must unanimously find that it included an agreement to commit the principal offence (Nirta v R (1983) 79 FLR 190). The content of the agreement can be inferred from the accused’s conduct (Nirta v R (1983) 79 FLR 190; X x Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx [1984] VR 417; X x Xxxxx [1922] VLR 469; Xxxxxxxxxx v R (1984) 153 CLR 317). It is not necessary that each party to the conspiracy actively participate in the commission of the planned offence (Rolls v R; Xxxxxxx v R (2011) 34 VR 80). The requirement that one of the parties must agree to pursue a course of conduct that involves the commission of an offence includes committing the offence as a secondary party (Xxx v R; Xxxxxxxx v R [2011] VSCA 404). For example, there is a conspiracy to murder where A and B agree that B would hire C, a stranger to the agreement, to kill D.
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. The Agreement consists of a total of 41 Articles, six Annexes (I to VI), four Protocols (A to D), and a Record of Understanding covering the following subjects: ➢ Trade in Goods ➢ Public Procurement ➢ Intellectual Property ➢ Competition ➢ Subsidies
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. Subject to conditions, the agreement prohibits the party where the ceding company is domiciled or has its head office: 1/3 • to introduce any collateral requirements (or measures having equivalent effect) in connection with cessions from the ceding company to the reinsurer in the other party either as condition for the reinsurer to enter into reinsurance agreement or as a condition for the ceding company to take credit for the reinsurance, which would result in less favourable treatment of the other party’s reinsurer company with respect to domestic reinsurance companies. • to introduce local presence requirement for the reinsurer as a condition for entering reinsurance agreement with the ceding company or to introduce any other requirements that would have the same effect as requiring local presence The above requirements are subject to specific conditions requiring inter alia that the reinsurance company maintains a certain level of own funds, a certain level of solvency ratio, requirement of prompt payment of the claims under the reinsurance agreement and criteria to assess such a prompt payment. The reinsurer must also agree on a certain number of clause related to dispute settlement resolution. 100% collateral must be provided in case the reinsurer enters into any solvent scheme arrangement involving the domestic ceding company. Collateral of all outstanding liabilities may be required if the ceding insurer is subject to a legal process of resolution or winding-up. Companies to a reinsurance agreement can also voluntarily agree on the requirement for a collateral in the terms of their reinsurance agreement. On the supervisory responsibility side, the agreement determines that the party where the reinsurance company has its parent is the responsible supervisory authority, though the other party may step in in certain circumstances. EU and US regulators will meet regularly within a Joint Committee to discuss implementation of the agreement and the agreement includes a consultation mechanism in case of disputes. Status of the procedure to adopt the agreement The negotiation on the agreement were concluded in January 2017. The Council of the EU adopted an amended decision to sign the agreement on 29 May 2017. The agreement was formally signed by the EU and US on 22. September 2017. The Council of the EU signed the agreement under the EU internal market competence (instead of the trade policy competence foreseen by the original Commission proposal). Notwit...
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. The present AGREEMENT completes the General Terms and Conditions of Purchase (CTCP) of CAIB. These documents make up an indivisible contractual framework. Any amendment to the present CONVENTION shall only be made by way of a rider, signed by both parties. The specific administrative clauses concerning public procurements published on SIMAP (Information system on public procurements in Switzerland) shall take precedence over this AGREEMENT.
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. The Parties shall consult each other at least 10 (ten) business days before any extraordinary and/or ordinary shareholders’ meeting of the Issuer, in order to discuss in good faith a common line of conduct with regard to the vote to be expressed in any shareholders’ meeting of the Issuer. In the case no agreement is reached on a common line of conduct and vote during the prior consultation, each Party will be entitled to express his vote at his own discretion and in the manner deemed appropriate and/or suitable, with honest judgement. In the case of Delisting, FGC Fin and the Bidder will ensure that 1 (one) member of the Board of Directors of the Issuer will be appointed, nominated jointly by Xxxx.xx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx and Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx.
