Ratification Process Sample Clauses

Ratification Process. When the Association and the District reach agreement on all matters under consideration, the items will be reduced to writing and shall be submitted to the membership of the Association for ratification and then to the District for official approval. No proposal shall be deemed accepted until a final agreement is reached and approved. The President of the association will have a print and/or digital copy of the proposed contract with a reasonable time before the ratification meeting for review.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Ratification Process. When final agreement is reached through negotiations, the outcome shall be reduced to writing and submitted to the ASSOCIATION for ratification. Within fifteen (15) days from the date of the tentative agreement, the ASSOCIATION shall vote on said Agreement and notify the Superintendent of its action. The BOARD shall take action upon the tentative agreement no later than fifteen (15) days from receipt of the ASSOCIATION’s action or at the next regular BOARD meeting, whichever comes first. Upon official adoption by the BOARD, the AGREEMENT shall be signed by the parties.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Ratification Process. When the Association and Board have reached tentative agreement on all matters being negotiated, they will be reduced to writing and be submitted to the membership of the Association and the Board of Education for ratification as follows:
Sample 1
Ratification Process. The Association agrees to seek ratification of this Tentative Agreement as soon as possible. If the Association ratifies this Tentative Agreement, it shall be submitted to District’s governing board for ratification as soon as possible. If both the Association and the District ratify this Tentative Agreement, negotiations for the 2019-20 school year shall be deemed concluded. If either the Association or the governing board do not ratify this Tentative Agreement, the parties shall immediately recommence negotiations for the 2019-20 school year.
Sample 1
Ratification Process. If Preliminary Consensus has been achieved, the Tribal, State and Federal caucuses shall ratify or reject the result of the Preliminary Consensus as follows:
Sample 1
Ratification Process. The Board and the Association shall confer upon their respective representatives the necessary power and authority to select the bargaining process, to participate in bargaining sessions, to make bargaining decisions, and to reach tentative written agreement which shall be presented to the Association for ratification and to the Board for adoption. After ratification by both parties and upon concurrence of and final approval of the preprinted contract in total by the chief negotiators of each team, the pre-printed contract shall prevail. The Board and Association will provide a link to the contract to be posted on the District's website.
Sample 1
Ratification Process. AFARS 5101.602-3-90 outlines the Army process for ratifying an unauthorized commitment. Unauthorized commitments may be paid by the Army through ratification. Ratification means the act of approving an unauthorized commitment by an official who has the authority to do so. The ratification process determines whether the Army or the initiator will pay the invoice. The individual who made an unauthorized commitment can be held personally liable to the vendor or the Government for the total cost of supplies or services obtained until the extent of the Government’s liability is determined. The Government accepts liability through ratification. When an A/OPC identifies a potential unauthorized commitment, the A/OPC must contact the local contracting office to initiate the ratification process. The ratification authority may be delegated in accordance with agency procedures, but in no case will the authority be delegated below the level of Chief of the Contracting office, or equivalent.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Ratification Process. 1. When the Council and Board reach tentative agreement on all matters being negotiated, they shall be prepared in writing and shall be submitted to the membership of the Council for ratification and to the Board for official approval, unless mutually agreed to the contrary.
Sample 1
Ratification Process. 9.1 The LWG shall provide a final draft specification to the PSDOs for Ratification using the processes defined by each individual PSDO as per this MOU.
Sample 1

Related to Ratification Process

  • Negotiation Process (a) If either the Chief Executive Officer of ICANN (“CEO”) or the Chairperson of the Registry Stakeholder Group (“Chair”) desires to discuss any revision(s) to this Agreement, the CEO or Chair, as applicable, shall provide written notice to the other person, which shall set forth in reasonable detail the proposed revisions to this Agreement (a “Negotiation Notice”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the CEO nor the Chair may

  • Selection Process The Mortgage Loans were selected from among the outstanding one- to four-family mortgage loans in the Seller's portfolio at the related Closing Date as to which the representations and warranties set forth in Subsection 9.02 could be made and such selection was not made in a manner so as to affect adversely the interests of the Purchaser;

  • Consultation Process (a) At the time of providing written notice of reduction to affected Employee(s), the Employer shall:

  • Application Process The employees wishing to enter into a job share arrangement will apply in writing to the Employer and forward a copy to the Union outlining the proposed commencement date of the job share, how the hours and days of work will be shared and how communication and continuity of work will be maintained. The Employer shall communicate a decision on a job share request in writing to the applicants. Applications to Job Sharing shall not be unreasonably denied.

  • TRANSACTION PROCESS The RFQ for this Lot will contain a deliverable-based Statement of Work (SOW). The RFQ will include, but is not limited to: Authorized User timeframes; system integration requirements; and other risks that may affect the cost to the Authorized User. All responses to RFQs must include detailed price information, including but not limited to: hours required per title, cost per hour etc. Travel, lodging and per diem costs must be itemized in the total quote and may not exceed the rates in the NYS OSC Travel Policy. More information can be found at xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/agencies/travel/travel.htm. All costs must be itemized and included in the Contractor’s quote.

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Mediation Process A. Mediation is a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) that may be requested by the City or the PBA. It is an alternative, not a substitute for the formal arbitration process contained in Section 19.7 above. Mediation is an informal process in which a neutral third party assists the opposing parties in reaching a voluntary, negotiated resolution of a charge of discipline. The decision to mediate is completely voluntary for the PBA and the City. Mediation gives the parties the opportunity to discuss the issues raised in the charging document, clear up misunderstandings, determine the underlying interests or concerns, find areas of agreement and, ultimately, incorporate those areas of agreement into solutions. A mediator does not resolve the charge or impose a decision on the parties. Instead, the mediator helps the parties to agree on a mutually acceptable resolution. The mediation process is strictly confidential. Information disclosed during mediation will not be revealed to anyone.

  • Appointment Process (i) A list of employees who have Continuing Sessional Standing shall be produced by the Employer by October 1st of each year. Bargaining Unit Employees who are newly granted Continuing Sessional Standing will be advised of such by the Employer by October first of the academic year in which their Continuing Sessional Standing is granted.

  • Escalation Process 9.1. There will be times when the pharmacist will need additional advice or will need to escalate the patient to a higher acuity care location (e.g. back to their GP or an Urgent Treatment Centre or A&E).

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.