No impact. The failure by either Party at any time to exercise or enforce any of its powers, remedies or rights under this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of those powers, remedies or rights or affect that Party's rights to exercise or enforce those powers, remedies or rights at any time.
No impact. The Recipient shall not undertake the Project, nor permit any activity to take place in connection with Project which would in any way affect the insurance coverage required hereunder.
No impact. The proposed project is located more than two miles from a public airport. The project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels.
No impact. 16. This Agreement shall not be administered or interpreted in any way that would cause adverse impacts to SWP approved Table A water or to any other SWP approved water allocations, water deliveries, or SWP operations or facilities. OFWD shall be responsible as determined by DWR, for any adverse impacts that may result from the exchange or delivery of water under this Agreement.
No impact. The project site is not located within view of any designated scenic highways or vistas. Lands are flat and distant views are of buildings in downtown Sacramento to the east and the coastal mountains to the west.
No impact. The proposed Project would not damage scenic resources. There are no scenic resources on or within view of the project site other than noted in (a), above. There are no buildings on the site, except for a barn.
No impact. The proposed Project would not degrade the existing visual character or the quality of the site and its surroundings.
No impact. The project site is under a Xxxxxxxxxx Act contract established in 1970. The California Land Conservation Act of 1965, commonly referred to as the Xxxxxxxxxx Act, enables local governments to enter into contracts with private landowners for the purpose of restricting specific parcels of land to agricultural or, if certain criteria are met, “open space” as defined in Government Code Section 51201(o). The Xxxxxxxxxx Act authorizes the Board of Supervisors to evaluate whether uses proposed as part of the Project qualify under Section 51201(o). Perhaps most relevant is Government Code Section 51201(o)(2), which defines “open space use” as including a “wildlife habitat area” as defined in turn by Section 51201(j). Subsection (j) states that a “wildlife habitat area is a land or water area designated by a board or council after consulting with and considering the recommendation of the Department of Fish and Game, as an area of importance for the protection or enhancement of the wildlife resources of the state.” As part of the planning and environmental review process, County staff will seek a recommendation from the Department of Fish and Wildlife on this issue. The Department’s recommendation will then be presented to the Board for consideration as it decides whether to approve the project, including a new Xxxxxxxxxx Act Contract that specifically authorizes open space uses. If approved, such a contract will eliminate any conflict with the Xxxxxxxxxx Act and the existing A-P zoning for the property. Finally, in some instances, a proposal such as the project may have the potential to encourage other landowners with Xxxxxxxxxx Act contracts in the project vicinity to also convert their properties to conservation banks or other habitat uses. This does not, however, present a conflict with zoning or existing Xxxxxxxxxx Act contracts so long as similar steps are taken. The particular circumstances of this project also minimize such concerns, as the project site is bordered on three sides by wetlands already (the existing conservation bank and duck clubs). The fourth contiguous property is owned by the applicant’s family and is planted in rice. It is not proposed for conversion in the foreseeable future. For all of the foregoing reasons, the project does not conflict with existing agricultural zoning or an existing Xxxxxxxxxx Act contract, as the contract itself will be amended and/or replaced as part of project approval and the Xxxxxxxxxx Act expressly authorizes ce...
No impact. The project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, any forest land.
No impact. The project would not result in the loss of any forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use.
