Evaluation of Proposals. 29.1 UNDP shall examine the Proposal to confirm that all terms and conditions under the UNDP General Terms and Conditions and Special Conditions have been accepted by the Proposer without any deviation or reservation.
Evaluation of Proposals. All proposals received shall be reviewed to determine whether they meet the format requirements and the standards specified in the request for sealed proposals. The district shall evaluate the qualifications of the proposers based solely upon the criteria and evaluation methodology set forth in the request for sealed proposals, and shall assign a best value score to each proposal. Once the evaluation is complete, all responsive proposals shall be ranked from the highest best value to the lowest best value to the district.
Evaluation of Proposals. Preliminary Examination of Proposals UNDP shall examine the Proposals to determine whether they are complete with respect to minimum documentary requirements, whether the documents have been properly signed, whether or not the Proposer is in the UN Security Council 1267/1989 Committee's list of terrorists and terrorist financiers, and in UNDP’s list of suspended and removed vendors, and whether the Proposals are generally in order, among other indicators that may be used at this stage. UNDP may reject any Proposal at this stage. Evaluation of Proposals UNDP shall examine the Proposal to confirm that all terms and conditions under the UNDP General Terms and Conditions and Special Conditions have been accepted by the Proposer without any deviation or reservation. The evaluation team shall review and evaluate the Technical Proposals on the basis of their responsiveness to the Terms of Reference and other documentation provided, applying the evaluation criteria, sub-criteria, and point system specified in the Data Sheet (DS no. 32). Each responsive Proposal will be given a technical score. A Proposal shall be rendered non-responsive at this stage if it does not substantially respond to the RFP particularly the demands of the Terms of Reference, which also means that it fails to achieve the minimum technical score indicated in the Data Sheet (DS no. 25). Absolutely no changes may be made by UNDP in the criteria, sub-criteria and point system indicated in the Data Sheet (DS no. 32) after all Proposals have been received. In the second stage, only the Financial Proposals of those Proposers who achieve the minimum technical score will be opened for evaluation for comparison and review. The Financial Proposal Envelopes corresponding to Proposals that did not meet the minimum passing technical score shall be returned to the Proposer unopened. The overall evaluation score will be based either on a combination of the technical score and the financial offer, or the lowest evaluated financial proposal of the technically qualified Proposers. The evaluation method that applies for this RFP shall be as indicated in the Data Sheet (DS No. 25). When the Data Sheet specifies a combined scoring method, the formula for the rating of the Proposals will be as follows: Rating the Technical Proposal (TP): TP Rating = (Total Score Obtained by the Offer / Max. Obtainable Score for TP) x 100 Rating the Financial Proposal (FP): FP Rating = (Lowest Priced Offer / Price of the Offer Bein...
Evaluation of Proposals. In light of the unique nature of the Company and its operations and in light of the Company’s status as an SRO, the Board, when evaluating any proposal, shall, to the fullest extent permitted by Applicable Law, take into account all factors that the Board deems relevant, including, without limitation, to the extent deemed relevant: (i) the potential impact thereof on the integrity, continuity and stability of the national securities exchange operated by the Company and the other operations of the Company, on the ability to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices and on investors and the public, and (ii) whether such proposal would (A) promote just and equitable principles of trade, (B) xxxxxx cooperation and coordination with Persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to and facilitating transactions in securities or (C) assist in the removal of impediments to or perfection of the mechanisms for a free and open market and a national market system.
Evaluation of Proposals. After the proposals required to construct the Regional Desalination Project are received, the Parties collectively, and each Party as to the facilities to be constructed, owned and operated by that Party, after consultation with the Advisory Committee and the Project Manager, shall:
Evaluation of Proposals. Proposals shall be evaluated based upon the following criteria:
Evaluation of Proposals. All proposals that are responsive to the solicitation will be evaluated. Each evaluation category will have a maximum point potential. The State will conduct a fair, impartial, and comprehensive evaluation of all proposals in accordance with the criteria set forth below. Areas that will be addressed and scored during the evaluation include: All proposals that are responsive to the solicitation will be evaluated based on the following: Cost Proposal Neb. Rev. Stat. §81-161 allows the quality of performance of previous contracts to be considered when evaluating responses to competitively bid solicitations in determining the lowest responsible bidder. Information obtained from any Vendor Performance Report (See Terms & Conditions, Section II.) may be used in evaluating responses to solicitations for goods and services to determine the best value for the State.
Evaluation of Proposals. Each Offeror’s proposal shall be evaluated according to the factors shown below. The factors are listed in descending order of importance. Management Approach is the most important factor and is additionally slightly more important than Price. Price is slightly more important than Technical Understanding/Approach. Technical Understanding/Approach, is in turn, slightly more important than Past Performance. Proposal risk will be assessed and integrated in the rating of each individual factor and subfactor. Proposal risks are those risks associated with an Offeror’s proposed manner in complying with the requirements of the RFQ. Offerors shall be made aware that Pricing may increase in importance, and become a discriminating factor as the proposals become similar in ratings for the other factors.
Evaluation of Proposals. The Government will evaluate fully, carefully and impartially all responsive proposals received in response to this Request for Proposal (RFP) by Market Segment in accordance with the evaluation factors outlined in Section M.2.0.
Evaluation of Proposals. All proposals that are responsive to the solicitation will be evaluated. Each evaluation category will have a maximum point potential. The State will conduct a fair, impartial, and comprehensive evaluation of all proposals in accordance with the criteria set forth below. Areas that will be addressed and scored during the evaluation include: All proposals that are responsive to the solicitation will be evaluated based on the following:
