Complete Settlement means an issue for which complete settlement was reached by all Parties, and if this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the OEB, the Parties will not adduce anyevidence or argument during the oral hearing in respect of these issues. # issues settled:All “Partial Settlement” means an issue for which there is partial settlement, as ERHDC and the Intervenors who take any position on the issue were able to agree on some, but not all, aspects of the particular issue. If this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the OEB, the Parties who take any position on the issue will only adduce evidence and argument during the hearing on those portions of theissues not addressed in this Settlement Proposal. # issues partially settled:None “No Settlement” means an issue for which no settlement was reached. ERHDC and the Intervenors who take a position on the issue will adduce evidence and/or argument at the hearing on theissue. # issues not settled:None
Complete Settlement means an issue for which complete settlement was reached by all Parties, and if this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the Board, the Parties will not adduce any evidence or argument during the oral hearing in respect of these issues. According to the Practice Direction (p. 3), the Parties must consider whether a Settlement Proposal should include an appropriate adjustment mechanism for any settled issue that may be affected by external factors. Any adjustments are specifically set out in the text of the Settlement Proposal. The Parties have settled the issues as a package, and none of the parts of this Settlement Proposal are severable. If the Board does not accept this Settlement Proposal in its entirety, then there is no settlement (unless the Parties agree in writing that any part(s) of this Settlement Proposal that the Board does accept may continue as a valid settlement without inclusion of any part(s) that the Board does not accept). In the event that the Board directs the Parties to make reasonable efforts to revise the Settlement Proposal, the Parties agree to use reasonable efforts to discuss any potential revisions, but no Party will be obligated to accept any proposed revision. The Parties agree that all of the Parties who took a position on a particular issue must agree with any revised Settlement Proposal as it relates to that issue prior to its resubmission to the Board. Unless stated otherwise, the settlement of any particular issue in this proceeding and the positions of the Parties in this Settlement Proposal are without prejudice to the rights of Parties to raise the same issue and/or to take any position thereon in any other proceeding, whether or not ENGLP is a party to such proceeding. Where in this Settlement Proposal, the Parties or any of them “accept” the evidence of, or “agree” to a revised term or condition, including a revised budget or forecast, then unless theagreement expressly states to the contrary, the words “for the purpose of settlement of the issues herein” shall be deemed to quantify that acceptance or agreement. SUMMARY In reaching this complete settlement, the Parties have been guided by the current Filing Requirements for Natural Gas Distributor Rate Applications (February 16, 2017) and the Approved Issues List attached as Schedule A to the Board’s Issues List Decision of November 2, 2018. This Settlement Proposal reflects a complete settlement of the issues in this proceeding. In addition to the foregoing and bel...
Complete Settlement means an issue for which complete settlement was reached by all Parties, and if this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the OEB, none of the Parties (including Parties who take no position on that issue) will adduce any evidence or argument during the hearing (if any) in respect of the specific issue. Issues Settled:
Examples of Complete Settlement in a sentence
Redistribution [Complete Settlement] Union is proposing to initially, and throughout the initial PBR term to unbundle its in-franchise storage services at cost.
Complete Settlement Parties accept THESL’s tax calculation methodology, subject to adjustments to the level of the PILs allowance to reflect the Board’s Decision, and to incorporation of the effects of known changes to GST and federal tax rates through the continuing use of variance accounts.
Complete Settlement Preamble THESL’s Cost of Capital evidence proposes that Allowed Return on Equity be determined prior to the test year or, if applicable, the test years, using the Board’s methodology as detailed in the Report of the Board on Cost of Capital and 2nd Generation Incentive Regulation for Ontario’s Electricity Distributors, issued December 20th, 2006.
Threshold Level [Complete Settlement] Union is proposing to manage the risks associated with allocating assets to meet incremental t-service and unbundling requests in the Northern & Eastern Operations area using the asset allocation methodology as outlined in the evidence at Exhibit B1, Tab 1, pp 43-47.
Term Storage Premium [Complete Settlement] Consistent with the Board’s RP-1999-0017 Decision, Union proposes to share the amounts in the S&T transactional services deferral accounts 75:25 in favour of customers for both 2000 and 2001.
More Definitions of Complete Settlement
Complete Settlement means an issue in respect of which Energy+ and the Intervenors who take a position on that issue, have agreed to a settlement of all aspects of the issue and if this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the Board, none of the Parties (including Parties who take no position on that issue) will adduce any evidence or argument during the oral hearing in respect of the specific issue. # issues settled:5 “Partial Settlement” means an issue in respect of which Energy+ and the Intervenors who take a position on that issue have agreed on some, but not all, aspects of that issue. If this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the Board, the Parties (including Parties who take no position on the Partial Settlement) will only adduce evidence and argument during the hearing on the portions of the issue for which no agreement has been reached. # issues partially settled:3 “No Settlement” means an issue in respect of which no settlement was reached. Energy+ and the Intervenors who take a position on the issue will adduce evidence and/or argument at the hearing on the issue. # issues not settled:6
Complete Settlement means an issue for which complete settlement was reached by all Parties, and if this Settlement Proposal is accepted, the Parties will not adduce any evidence or argument during the oral hearing in respect of these issues.
Complete Settlement means an issue for which complete settlement was reached by all Parties, and if this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the OEB, the Parties will not adduce any evidence or argument during the oral hearing in respect of these issues.issues settled:1 1.1, 2.1,2.2, 3.1,4.1, 5.1,6.1, 6.2,7.1-7.5,8.1, 9.1,10.1-10.7,11.1, 11.2,12.1, 12.2,13.3, 13.4,13.5, 16.1“Partial Settlement” means an issue for which there is partial settlement, as OPG and the Intervenors who take any position on the issue were able to agree on some, but not all, aspects of the particular issue. If this Settlement Proposal is accepted by the OEB, the Parties who take any position on the issue will only adduce evidence and argument during the hearing on those portions of the issues not addressed in this Settlement Proposal. With respect to Issues 1.2, 13.1 and 14.1, denoted as Partial Settlement, the Parties settled on all matters within the issues, with the exception of (i) the recording of small modular reactor (“SMR”) related costs in the Nuclear Development Variance Account in
Complete Settlement. For the purpose of obtaining a complete settlement with the exception of the three outstanding issues, the Parties accept Algoma's proposal to align its 2011 rate year with its January 1, 2011 fiscal year. Evidence: XXX Xxxxxxxxxxxxx Xx. 0x Supporting parties: API, SEC, EP and VECC Parties taking no position: None. Opposing parties: None
Complete Settlement. For the purpose of obtaining a complete settlement with the exception of the three outstanding issues, and for the purpose of calculating 2011 revenue requirement only, the Parties agree with the proposed 2010 rate base of $69,471,646 and the 2011 rate base of $76,827,242. Evidence: Exhibit 2, Tab 1, Schedule 1, Exhibit 2, Tab 3, Schedule 1, Exhibit 2, Tab 4, Schedule 1, Exhibit 2, Tab 4, Schedule 2. Supporting parties: API, SEC, EP and VECC Parties taking no position: None. Opposing parties: None 2b. Are the amounts proposed for the 2010 and 2011 capital expenditures appropriate?
Complete Settlement. For the purpose of obtaining a complete settlement with the exception of the three outstanding issues, and for the purpose of calculating 2011 revenue requirement only, the Parties agree that the proposed 2010 capital expenditures of $11,371,113 and 2011 capital expenditures of $10,869,825 are appropriate. Evidence: Exhibit 2, Tab 1, Schedule 1, Exhibit 2, Tab 3, Schedule 1, Exhibit 2, Tab 4, Schedule 1, Exhibit 2, Tab 4, Schedule 2. Supporting parties: API, SEC, EP and VECC Parties taking no position: None. Opposing parties: None 2c. Is API's proposal to capitalize its overhead costs appropriate?