Common use of Where CPN Clause in Contracts

Where CPN. is not available in a LATA for greater than ten percent (10%) of the traffic, the Party sending the traffic shall provide factors to determine the jurisdiction, as well as local vs. toll distinction, of the traffic. Such factors shall be supported by call record details that will be made available for review upon request when a Party is passing CPN but the receiving Party is not properly receiving or recording the information. The Parties shall cooperatively work to correctly identify the traffic, and establish a mutually agreeable mechanism that will prevent improperly rated traffic. Notwithstanding this, if any improperly rated traffic occurs, the Parties agree to reconcile it.

Where CPN. is not available in a LATA for greater than ten percent (10%) of the traffic, the Party party sending the traffic shall provide factors to determine the jurisdiction, as well as local vs. toll distinction, of the traffic. Such factors shall be supported by call record details that will be made available for review upon request when a Party is request. Where parties are passing CPN but the receiving Party party is not properly receiving or recording the information. The , the Parties shall cooperatively work to correctly identify the traffic, and establish a mutually agreeable mechanism that will prevent improperly rated traffic. Notwithstanding this, if any improperly rated traffic occurs, the Parties agree to reconcile it.

Where CPN. is not available in a LATA for greater than ten percent (10%) of the traffic, the Party sending the traffic shall provide factors to determine the jurisdiction, as well as local vs. toll distinction, of the traffic. Such factors shall be supported by call record details that will be made available for review upon request when a Party is request. Where Parties are passing CPN but the receiving Party is not properly receiving or recording the information. The , the Parties shall cooperatively work to correctly identify the traffic, and establish a mutually agreeable mechanism that will prevent improperly rated traffic. Notwithstanding this, if any improperly rated traffic occurs, the Parties agree to reconcile it.

Where CPN. is not available in a LATA for greater than ten percent (10%) % of the traffic, the Party sending the traffic shall provide factors to determine the jurisdiction, as well as local vs. toll distinction, of the traffic. Such factors shall be supported by call record details that will be made available for review upon request when request. Where a Party is passing CPN but the receiving Party is not properly receiving or recording the information. The , the Parties shall cooperatively work to correctly identify the traffic, and establish a mutually agreeable mechanism that will prevent improperly rated traffic. Notwithstanding this, if any improperly rated traffic occurs, the Parties agree to reconcile it.

Where CPN. is not available in a LATA for greater than ten percent (10%) of the traffic, the Party party sending the traffic shall provide factors to determine the jurisdiction, as well as local vs. toll distinction, of the traffic. Such factors shall be supported by call record details that will be made available for review upon request when a Party is request. Where parties are passing CPN but the receiving Party party is not properly receiving or recording the information. The Parties , the shall cooperatively work to correctly identify the traffic, and establish a mutually agreeable mechanism that will prevent improperly rated traffic. Notwithstanding this, if any improperly rated traffic occurs, the Parties agree to reconcile it.

Where CPN. is not available in a LATA for greater than ten percent (10%) % of the traffic, the Party sending the traffic shall provide factors to determine the jurisdiction, as well as local vs. toll distinction, of the traffic. Such factors shall be supported by call record details that will be made available for review upon request when a Party is request. Where parties are passing CPN but the receiving Party is not properly receiving or recording the information. The , the Parties shall cooperatively work to correctly identify the traffic, and establish a mutually agreeable mechanism that will prevent improperly rated traffic. .. Notwithstanding this, if any improperly rated traffic occurs, the Parties agree to reconcile it.