Stakeholder Feedback Sample Clauses

Stakeholder Feedback. The TSOs’ report will include stakeholder input and/or comments on the time period and data covered and analysed in the report, which should be taken into account when we assess the report.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Stakeholder Feedback. During the Covid-19 pandemic soft closure and the 2020-21 school year, we sent out three parent surveys to assess parental opinions about student safety and achievement and found that parents overwhelming felt that their students were not doing as well academically on the hybrid schedule. However, most parents preferred the hybrid schedule for safety reasons and to mitigate the risk of Covid infection to their child(ren). We also publish a monthly stakeholders newsletter inviting feedback in all areas. We scored 4.52/5.00 on effective communication and 4.72/5.00 on handling the challenges of the Covid-19 pandemic on our 2020-21 parent survey. Longitudinal Submeasure Performance: Mountain West Montessori Academy Acadience Reading Assessment Data Data Source mClass—Comparing Measures by Benchmark Period Data Point Percentage of Students At or Above Benchmark at Benchmark Period Percentage At or Above Benchmark First Sound Fluency (FSF) Phonemic Awareness Phoneme Segmentati on Fluency (PSF) Phonemic Awareness Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF)(CL S) Phonics/ Alphabetic Principle Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF)(W WR) Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Accuracy Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Fluency Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Retell Daze K 2016-17 2016-17 2016-17 BOY 85% XXX 70% XXX 62% XXX 78% EOY 64% EOY 56% 2017-18 2017-18 2017-18 BOY 86% XXX 78% XXX 72% XXX 77% EOY 78% EOY 66% 2018-19 2018-19 2018-19 BOY 80% XXX 94% XXX 81% XXX 92% EOY 98% EOY 83% 2019- 2019- 2019- 2020 2020 2020 BOY 80% XXX 92% XXX 74% XXX 94% EOY EOY COVID (no COVID (no scores) scores) 2020- 2021 2020- 2020- BOY 84% 2021 2021 XXX 81% XXX 86% XXX 69% EOY 84% EOY 62% Percentage At or Above Benchmark First Sound Fluency (FSF) Phonemic Awareness Phoneme Segmentati on Fluency (PSF) Phonemic Awareness Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF)(CL S) Phonics/ Alphabetic Principle Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF)(W WR) Phonics/ Alphabetic Principle Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Accuracy Phonics/ Alphabetic Principle Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Fluency Fluency Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Retell Comprehen sion Daze Comprehen sion 1 2016-17 2016-17 2016-17 2016-17 2016-17 2016-17 BOY 51% BOY 70% XXX 64% BOY 82% XXX 83% XXX 58% EOY 64% XXX 49% EOY 55% EOY 85% 2017-18 BOY 55% EOY 62% EOY 69% 2017-18 2017-18 2017-18 2017-18 2017-18 2018-19 BOY 74% BOY 92% XXX 62% XXX 60% EOY 86% BOY 47% MOY 75% EOY 71% XXX 79% EOY 81% EOY 73% EOY 65% 2019- 2020 2018-19 2018-19 2018-19 2018-19 2018-19 BOY 69% BOY 66% XXX 76% BOY 87% XXX 84% XXX 60% EOY 58% XXX 68% EO...
Sample 1
Stakeholder Feedback. 14.1.5 Torbay Council has considered the national feedback from Transport Focus on “what passengers want”. Table 2 is an extract from the Transport Focus report “Bus passengers’ priorities for improvement 2020”. Understanding the detail behind the responses, for the Torbay circumstance where there is a need to attract more younger people to the network, the partners can see that the priorities were more buses arriving on time and offering better value. However, Torbay has a significant ageing population and one that needs to be included in the network design, critically to avoid aspects such as social isolation. The priority for the older age group was buses running more often. The top three priorities are very similar between all age groups. Table 2: Transport Focus Passenger Study (2020)
Sample 1
Stakeholder Feedback. CONTRACTOR will solicit feedback in the form of interviews and/or written questionnaires, prepared by CONTRACTOR. Deliverable: Meeting to Review Findings Due: Week of February 14, 2022 SBCAG Deliverable: Functionality Lists, API Keys Due: Week of February 14, 2022
Sample 1
Stakeholder Feedback. A number of patients participated in NHS Tayside’s AEDET workshop on 23 February 2018 and details about their feedback is set out in section 4.8. A stakeholder workshop involving NHS Tayside Public Partners was also held on 13 March 2018. Workshop attendees were broadly supportive of the programme work undertaken to date. In particular they noted that the programme timescales were challenging but would have real benefits for patients in terms of reduced waiting lists; increased capacity to provide elective surgery across a number of surgical disciplines; and potentially an enhanced environment for patients and visitors. They acknowledged that further work and detail was required around costs, resources and design. Participants highlighted priority areas for the Tayside Elective Care Centre, including parking, access, travel and public transport and single room accommodation which did not leave patients feeling isolated. Further details about our engagement with stakeholders is contained in the table at section 4.3.
Sample 1
Stakeholder Feedback. Cal CCA requested additional clarification if the subscriptions will end after some point in time, extend in perpetuity, or can be extended or transferred. The ISO will implement the subscriber rights consistent with the terms and conditions of the agreements executed by the Subscriber Participating TO. In the case of TransWest, the ISO understands that the Transmission Service Agreements resulting from the FERC-approved open solicitation will be for 30 years with a single opportunity to extend the agreement for five years. Once the agreements have terminated, the entire transmission facilities will be included in the ISO market as unsubscribed capacity subject to a Subscriber Wheeling Charge12. The CPUC requested clarification on If the transmission has been fully subscribed by the Power Company of Wyoming (“PCW”), is there capacity available to flow through to California? If so, how much? Would adding this transmission project in this location increase congestion in the ISO BAA? PCW, which is the wind developer in Wyoming and which does not currently provide any service to end-use customers in Wyoming, has purchased the full 3,000 MW available on the Project. All 3,000 MW could flow to California, including 1,500 MWs to the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power through their Intermountain Power Project transmission facilities and 1,500 MW to the Xxxxx Xxxxx – Eldorado line in the ISO balancing area. However, the flow of generation will ultimately depend upon the off-takers who sign up with PCW for the wind generation. With respect to congestion, The ISO understand that PCW intends to go through the ISO’s generator interconnection process and if additional deliverability network upgrades are required to ensure deliverability to ISO load, PCW will incur the costs of those additional transmission facilities without reimbursement by the existing Participating TOs consistent with the principle of the Subscriber PTO Model that connecting the facilities will not increase the TAC.
Sample 1
Stakeholder Feedback. Significant patient feedback has been sought for the orthopaedic service. Two patient studies have been completed to understand the impact of using video conferencing for new outpatient consultations. In addition a patient survey has been undertaken to seek general patient feedback about the service currently provided. As part of the feedback process patients were asked if they would be willing to be involved in shaping the future expansion of services at the GJF, the response has been overwhelmingly positive with lots of patients volunteering to get involved in the expansion project.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Stakeholder Feedback

  • Customer Feedback The contractor is expected to establish and maintain professional communication between its employees and customers. The primary objective of this communication is customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction is the most significant external indicator of the success and effectiveness of all services provided and can be measured through customer complaints and surveys. Performance management drives the contractor to be customer focused through initially and internally addressing customer complaints and investigating the issues and/or problems but the customer always has the option to communicate complaints to the PM, as opposed to the contractor. Customer feedback may also be obtained either from the results of formal customer satisfaction surveys or from random customer complaints. Any customer complaints will be investigated by the PM using the Quality Assurance Monitoring Form – Customer Complaint Investigation, identified in Attachment A4.

  • Using Student feedback in Educator Evaluation ESE will provide model contract language, direction and guidance on using student feedback in Educator Evaluation by June 30, 2013. Upon receiving this model contract language, direction and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.

  • Feedback You have no obligation to provide us with ideas, suggestions, or proposals (“Feedback”). However, if you submit Feedback to us, then you grant us a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license that is sub-licensable and trans- ferable, to make, use, sell, have made, offer to sell, import, reproduce, publicly display, distribute, modify, or publicly perform the Feedback in any manner without any obligation, royalty, or restriction based on intellectual property rights or otherwise.

  • Feedback and Complaints 34.1. The primary responsibility for receiving feedback and investigating complaints promptly and thoroughly in respect of the Services shall rest with the Contractor. The Contractor shall have procedures in place, which are acceptable to the ESFA, to gather and act upon feedback and complaints from Learners and/or their representatives and employers and the wider community.

  • Project Team Cooperation Partnering 1.1.3 Constitutional Principles Applicable to State Public Works Projects.

  • Orientation Program The Company will allow a designated representative of the Local or Bargaining Unit up to one (1) hour per calendar month for the purpose of conducting the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union New Members’ Orientation Program. Such meetings will be conducted during the probationary period of employees, and will be held on Company premises. Employees participating in Orientation Program meetings during their normally scheduled working hours will not suffer loss of pay at their regular rate. Orientation Program meetings will be scheduled by Management and a Management representative may attend as an observer.

  • Peer Assistance and Review Program 1. MCEA and MCPS agree to jointly operate a Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) Program. The PAR Program is a mechanism for maintaining systemwide quality control and ensuring that all MCPS teachers responsible for teaching students are functioning at or above the high MCPS standards of performance. It provides intensive assistance for any teacher who has not yet achieved that standard or who falls below acceptable standards. Assistance and review are provided to both experienced MCPS teachers in need of significant improvement and teachers in their first year of teaching.

  • CHILD AND DEPENDENT ADULT/ELDER ABUSE REPORTING CONTRACTOR shall establish a procedure acceptable to ADMINISTRATOR to ensure that all employees, agents, subcontractors, and all other individuals performing services under this Agreement report child abuse or neglect to one of the agencies specified in Penal Code Section 11165.9 and dependent adult or elder abuse as defined in Section 15610.07 of the WIC to one of the agencies specified in WIC Section 15630. CONTRACTOR shall require such employees, agents, subcontractors, and all other individuals performing services under this Agreement to sign a statement acknowledging the child abuse reporting requirements set forth in Sections 11166 and 11166.05 of the Penal Code and the dependent adult and elder abuse reporting requirements, as set forth in Section 15630 of the WIC, and shall comply with the provisions of these code sections, as they now exist or as they may hereafter be amended.

  • Contractor Sales Reporting Vendor Management Fee Contractor Reports Master Contract Sales Reporting. Contractor shall report total Master Contract sales quarterly to Enterprise Services, as set forth below. Master Contract Sales Reporting System. Contractor shall report quarterly Master Contract sales in Enterprise Services’ Master Contract Sales Reporting System. Enterprise Services will provide Contractor with a login password and a vendor number. The password and vendor number will be provided to the Sales Reporting Representative(s) listed on Contractor’s Bidder Profile. Data. Each sales report must identify every authorized Purchaser by name as it is known to Enterprise Services and its total combined sales amount invoiced during the reporting period (i.e., sales of an entire agency or political subdivision, not its individual subsections). The “Miscellaneous” option may be used only with prior approval by Enterprise Services. Upon request, Contractor shall provide contact information for all authorized purchasers specified herein during the term of the Master Contract. If there are no Master Contract sales during the reporting period, Contractor must report zero sales. Due dates for Master Contract Sales Reporting. Quarterly Master Contract Sales Reports must be submitted electronically by the following deadlines for all sales invoiced during the applicable calendar quarter: For Calendar Quarter Ending Master Contract Sales Report Due March 31: April 30 June 30: July 31 September 30: October 31 December 31: January 31 Vendor Management Fee. Contractor shall pay to Enterprise Services a vendor management fee (“VMF”) of 0.74 percent on the purchase price for all Master Contract sales (the purchase price is the total invoice price less applicable sales tax). The sum owed by Contractor to Enterprise Services as a result of the VMF is calculated as follows: Amount owed to Enterprise Services = Total Master Contract sales invoiced (not including sales tax) x .0074. The VMF must be rolled into Contractor’s current pricing. The VMF must not be shown as a separate line item on any invoice unless specifically requested and approved by Enterprise Services. Enterprise Services will invoice Contractor quarterly based on Master Contract sales reported by Contractor. Contractors are not to remit payment until they receive an invoice from Enterprise Services. Contractor’s VMF payment to Enterprise Services must reference this Master Contract number, work request number (if applicable), the year and quarter for which the VMF is being remitted, and the Contractor’s name as set forth in this Master Contract, if not already included on the face of the check. Failure to accurately report total net sales, to submit a timely usage report, or remit timely payment of the VMF, may be cause for Master Contract termination or the exercise of other remedies provided by law. Without limiting any other available remedies, the Parties agree that Contractor’s failure to remit to Enterprise Services timely payment of the VMF shall obligate Contractor to pay to Enterprise Services, to offset the administrative and transaction costs incurred by the State to identify, process, and collect such sums. the sum of $200.00 or twenty-five percent (25%) of the outstanding amount, whichever is greater, or the maximum allowed by law, if less. Enterprise Services reserves the right, upon thirty (30) days advance written notice, to increase, reduce, or eliminate the VMF for subsequent purchases, and reserves the right to renegotiate Master Contract pricing with Contractor when any subsequent adjustment of the VMF might justify a change in pricing.

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.