Sources of Evaluation. An annual evaluation is a subjective assessment of an individual’s performance based on objective criteria. The criteria are useful tools for evaluating overall performance. The evaluation is intended to be comprehensive and not based on a single or limited number of criteria. Therefore, the person responsible for completing the faculty member’s annual evaluation shall consider all appropriate and available information that is relevant to the faculty member’s performance of assigned responsibilities. The materials in the evaluation file and documented information from the following sources: immediate supervisor, peers, students (if applicable), faculty member/self, other University officials who have responsibility for supervision of the faculty member, and individuals to whom the faculty members may be responsible in the course of a service assignment may be used in the evaluation process. Materials submitted by persons other than the faculty member shall be shown to the faculty member, who may attach a written response. Any materials that have not been shown to the faculty member cannot be used in the evaluation process. Whenever a single or limited number of criteria are deemed controlling, the written evaluation must justify that conclusion.
Sources of Evaluation. (a) Faculty Annual Report. Each faculty member shall submit to his/her chair/supervisor a report of annual activities in teaching, research/scholarship/creative activities, service, and other University duties consistent with the provisions of Sections 18.6 through 18.8. Each department/unit shall specify the required format and minimum content of the faculty annual report pursuant to Sections 18.6 and 18.7. The faculty annual report shall include any interpretive comments and/or supporting data that the faculty member deems appropriate in evaluating his/her performance.
Sources of Evaluation. The sources of evaluation shall include:
Sources of Evaluation. (a) Faculty Annual Report. Every year, each faculty member shall submit to the chair/ or supervisor (hereafter, “chair”) a report of the faculty member’s annual activities in teaching, research/scholarship/creative activities, service, and other University duties for that year.
Sources of Evaluation. An annual evaluation is a subjective assessment of an individual’s performance based on objective criteria. The criteria are useful tools for evaluating overall performance. The evaluation is intended to be comprehensive and not based on a single or limited number of criteria sources of information. Therefore, the person responsible for completing the faculty member’s annual evaluation shall consider all appropriate and available information that is relevant to the faculty member’s performance of assigned responsibilities. This will include the faculty member’s annual self-evaluation portfolio of activities and documented information from the following sources: immediate supervisor, peers, students, faculty member/self, other University officials who have responsibility for supervision of the faculty member, and individuals to whom the faculty member may be responsible in the course of a service assignment. Any materials to be used in the evaluation process submitted by persons other than the faculty member shall be shown to the faculty member, who may attach a written response. Any materials that have not been shown to the faculty member cannot be used in the evaluation process. Whenever a single or limited number of criteria are deemed controlling, the written evaluation must justify that conclusion.
Sources of Evaluation. The sources of evaluation shall include administrative, student and peer review, and a self evaluation.
Sources of Evaluation. The sources of evaluation shall include both administrative and peer review.
Sources of Evaluation. 29 30 An annual evaluation is a subjective assessment of an individual’s performance based on 31 objective criteria. The criteria are useful tools for evaluating overall performance. The 32 evaluation is intended to be comprehensive and not based on a single or limited number of
Sources of Evaluation. A n annual evaluation is a subjective assessment of an individual’s performance based on objective criteria. The criteria are useful tools for evaluating overall performance. The evaluation is intended to be comprehensive and not based on a single or limited number of criteria. Therefore, the person responsible for completing the faculty member’s annual evaluation shall consider all appropriate and available information that is relevant to the
Sources of Evaluation
