Quality Issues i. Provisions of the communication of all credentialing decisions, in writing, to applicants for credentialing or re- credentialing.
Quality Issues. Quality issues must be responded to by McDATA [*] after McDATA is notified that such an issue exists. [*].
Quality Issues. Quality Issues must be responded to by Brocade within two (2) business days after being notified that such an issue exists. Brocade shall completely close the Quality Issue with effective corrective action that will prevent a repeat failure within [*] depending on the nature of the issue.
Quality Issues. Suntech agrees to use reasonable commercial efforts to inform Licensor of any quality issues concerning the production of the Products as soon as possible after discovery thereof.
Quality Issues. DNA shall promptly bring to VISTA’s attention, and work with VISTA in good faith to address, any significant flaws, design problems, quality issues or Customer dissatisfaction with the Authorized Products, including quality issues related to the Licensed Technology. The parties’ rights in and to any ideas, concepts, processes, methods, techniques, inventions, materials, strategies, data and other information related to any resolving such flaws, problems, issues or dissatisfaction shall be subject to and governed by Article 5 of the License Agreement.
Quality Issues. 13.1 In case of any return of products based on quality issues, you agree to support us in any investigation relating to these matters free of charge.
Quality Issues. In the event of any quality issue, access to production batch and manufacturing data must be provided within one working day. If the problem has been caused by product quality, the Parties shall find the solution by one working day at the latest. Immediately after receiving the first information about a complaint, the Supplier shall enter into contact with S & G to discuss on substitute delivery or other measures to assure proper quality of supplies. The SUPPLIER shall guarantee availability of resources for failure investigation and analysis as soon as possible. The following standard complaint processing procedure has been agreed upon in S & G: • Preliminary opinion must be obtained by S & G within 24 hours after the complaint. • Contents of the primary answer: 8D Report incl. ‟Immediate Measures‟ • Comprehensive 8D report must be obtained by S & G by 14 calendar days after issuing the claim at the latest. • If the SUPPLIER cannot provide comprehensive 8D report within this time, detailed interim report must be provided. • Detailed interim report shall also include the deadline for provision of the comprehensive 8 D report (or next interim report, as the case may be). • The time span between two interim reports shall not exceed 14 calendar days. • The 14-days term for provision of the comprehensive 8D report may only be extended in case of well-founded interim reports. • Final failure analysis reports must be meaningful, conclusive and comprehensive. • The format as defined for the 8D report shall be used in all reports. If the SUPPLIER fails to restore adequate quality level within mutually agreed period of time, S & G can ask the SUPPLIER to seek external assistance, at SUPPLIER´s own expense. The first 3 shipments of good products after a complaint shall be identified using orange labels with complaint number and specification of the deviation.
Quality Issues. Employees who knowingly or intentionally create a quality issue First Offence: Discharge Violation of Respect Policy First Offence: Suspension for balance of shift Second Offence: three day suspension Third Offence: discharge
Quality Issues. AMAG shall be responsible for compensating DSM for all Third Party resources reasonably required to investigate and resolve quality issues arising with the Designated Vendor, as requested in writing by AMAG.
Quality Issues. In the event of any material quality issues arise with respect to an Unapproved Vendor, the Parties agree to consult in good faith to determine an appropriate course of action regarding such Unapproved Vendor and to mutually agree on a corrective action plan or a plan to secure an alternate Unapproved Vendor or Approved Vendor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, OMEROS shall be responsible for compensating DSM for all resources reasonably required to investigate and resolve such quality issues.
