Project Prioritization. The FAA does not normally issue a design approval for a product manufactured outside the United States unless it is to be imported, i.e., an aircraft to be U.S.-registered or an engine, propeller, appliance or part to be incorporated into the design of a U.S.-registered aircraft or U.S.-manufactured product. Union applicants for U.S. design approval should provide the FAA with evidence of import. EASA will adopt a similar project prioritization approach for applications from U.S. applicants under this agreement.
Project Prioritization. The District will notice the public 30 days prior to the acceptance of project applications. Applications submitted for conversion projects that are eligible for the Program will be approved on a first-come, first served basis.
Project Prioritization. The selection and timing of particular projects for Program Access Improvements (including, without limitation, the selection of the types of Program Access Improvements set forth in Section 12.4 above that will be conducted, the selection of locations where installation, remediation or other construction will be conducted, the selection of personnel, materials, methodologies and technologies to be utilized, and the order and scope of the particular projects) shall be determined by the City in its discretion, subject to the following priorities:
Project Prioritization. Task 6.1 CIP Project List Development The Consultant will review current TMP project lists to determine if any projects are completed, under development, or no longer feasible and update the status of projects. The Consultant will consolidate the existing project lists for roadways, intersections, pedestrians, bikes, transit, and system management into one Transportation Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), removing overlaps between projects, and updating planning level cost estimates based on revisions to cross sections, project scopes, and updated construction cost information publicly available. Task 6.2 CIP Project Prioritization Using goals and objectives identified in Task 2.3, the Consultant will work with City staff to develop priorities for transportation project evaluation and prioritization for roadway projects. The Consultant will develop a prioritization tool to rank projects based on up to six (6) mobility priorities and weighting each priority with measures of effectiveness. The results of the exercises in this subtask will be used to develop a prioritization tool for ranking projects in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Standalone sidewalk, bike, trail, intersection and other projects will be shown and dollars allocated on an annual basis in the CIP, but not prioritized as part of this effort. The resulting prioritized project list will include a subset of projects anticipated to be completed in a 10-year planning window in support of Task 3.
Project Prioritization. Each of the four processes described in Section 2.2 result in the creation of sewer rehabilitation and replacement projects. The emergency projects are addressed immediately through existing emergency services contracts. The expedited projects are dispatched and addressed in a matter of months and are completed in the order the projects are dispatched. The primary and secondary sewer projects are placed into the wastewater capital improvements program and are scheduled for design and construction in the same order as planned since primary sewers and secondary sewer basins are planned in priority order. The City has a process to review project priorities on an annual basis as part of the Wastewater Capital Improvements Program (WCIP) annual reviews and to accelerated or decelerated project schedules if deemed necessary. Additionally, the City has a Program Review Committee (PRC) that meets monthly to review and modify project scope and schedule if deemed necessary.
Project Prioritization. “Priorities”). The selection of projects for Program Access Improvements will be based on needed Program Access Improvements that have been identified by the Department through Access Requests and other means. These projects will be prioritized as follows:
Project Prioritization. (a) The Signatory States agree to prioritizing projects based upon those projects which provide the most benefit to solving the problems of reducing congestion, enhancing mobility, improving safety, reducing environmental impacts, minimizing impacts to communities and public health, improving security, enhancing economic development, and facilitating multimodal integration. Projects shall be evaluated and selected upon their merit to achieve the objectives of the CFP and factors specified in the Development Agreement. An example of project evaluation factors is contained in Exhibit C, Project Selection Criteria. Phase 2 of the feasibility study will include recommendations for project selection criteria with objective data and information to support the decision making process.
Project Prioritization. The licensee will consult with the USDA-FS and Skagit County to develop criteria to prioritize sites for treatment. Factors that will be considered when prioritizing sites will include (but not be limited to): • Location relative to recreation sites, heritage resources, aesthetic, cultural sites and facilities; • Severity and ongoing rate of erosion; • Land ownership; • Likelihood of treatment success; • Approximate cost of treatment; and • Available funding. The criteria will be used to rank the list of potential treatment sites and identify those sites that are considered highest priority for treatment.
Project Prioritization. This subtask will:
Project Prioritization. Recommended improvement projects will be identified. Roadways will be analyzed by a number of different transportation factors.
