NEXT STEPS. If you disagree with my findings you may request a hearing to appeal the decision by contacting me using the details provided. If you would like to discuss your application or if there is any confusion on how to proceed, you can write to, e-mail or telephone me. My contact details are shown at the top of this letter. Failure to Respond If you fail to respond by the date given above, your application will be refused under Section 3A(4) of the Registered Designs Act 1949.
NEXT STEPS. 1. Review this information with appropriate staff.
NEXT STEPS. Upon approval of this recommendation, the attached timeline related to communication and processing of applications will be followed (Attachment III). The holdback percentage will be reviewed and revised as required based on known tuition fee increases and with consideration to the potential impact of exchange rates on international tuition fees. ATTACHMENTS & APPENDICES ATTACHMENT I Professional Improvement Program History ATTACHMENT II Comparison by Year of Successful Teacher Certificated Applicants ATTACHMENT III 2015-2016 Professional Improvement Program Timeline DF:rt ATTACHMENT I PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HISTORY YEAR FUND MAXIMUM AS PER CLAUSE 23.7 APPROVED BUDGET % OF MAXIMUM APPROVED TOTAL LEAVE FTE ACTUAL $ GRANTED FOR LEAVES ACTUAL $ GRANTED FOR TUITION TOTAL ACTUAL $ GRANTED FOR LEAVES & TUITION 2005-2006 2,232,456 1,200,000 54% 18.35 1,036,637 105,341 1,141,978 2006-2007 2,307,846 1,200,000 52% 15.76 934,471 169,269 1,103,740 2007-2008 2,342,776 1,200,000 51% 15.46 938,042 150,920 1,088,962 2008-2009 2,392,026 1,300,000 54% 11.67 763,271 274,958 1,038,229 2009-2010 2,504,746 1,300,000 52% 6.54 382,159 349,969 732,128 2010-2011 2,774,936 1,200,000 43% 12.19 756,640 306,366 1,063,006 2011-2012 2,899,830 1,200,000 41% 15.65 768,459 316,283 1,084,742 2012-2013 2013-2014 3,005,090 3,062,822 1,200,000 1,200,000 40% 39% 12.48 11.56 785,786 706,110 296,530 354,758 1,082,316 1,060,868 2014-2015 3,019,266 1,000,000 33% 7.20 517,762 367,680 885,442 COMPARISON BY YEAR OF SUCCESSFUL TEACHER CERTIFICATED APPLICANTS YEAR TOTAL NUMBER OF APPLICANTS NUMBER SUCCESSFUL 2005-2006 61 40 2006-2007 67 51 2007-2008 68 45 2008-2009 53 50 2009-2010 64 64 2010-2011 60 58 2011-2012 87 84 2012-2013 71 70 2013-2014 2014-2015 87¹ 75³ 76² 73⁴ ¹82 through the Clause 23 Professional Improvement Program and 5 Exempt staff ²73 through the Clause 23 Professional Improvement Program and 3 Exempt staff ³75 through the Clause 23 Professional Improvement Program and 5 Exempt staff ⁴73 through the Clause 23 Professional Improvement Program and 5 Exempt Staff 2015-2016 PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIMELINE Activity Date Need To Know News item and application information package available to staff online October 31, 2014 Information meetings for interested staff (4:15-6:00 p.m. Conference Centre, Centre for Education) November 25 December 1 Obtain data to compute maximums as per Clause 23.5 of Teachers’ contract November 28 Due date for applications January 9, 2015 Processing...
NEXT STEPS. If you can you: • identify appropriate product groups across your CCA target unit and their base year and target period production volumes, and • derive the base year energy use of each product group, then you should investigate whether it would be more appropriate for your company to have a NOVEM CCA target. We have provided a NOVEM calculation spreadsheet template to enable companies to identify if they would be ‘better off’. The spreadsheet asks for information about your current CCA, and a rough estimation of the information needed to switch to a NOVEM target and forecasts the next target period performance with and without a NOVEM target. If switching to a NOVEM target is appropriate then an application must be prepared and submitted to make the change formally (this is discussed overleaf).
NEXT STEPS. Disclosure information
NEXT STEPS. The CLIENT acknowledges receipt of the PLANNER’s Next Steps document.
NEXT STEPS. If you are interested in entering into a Ramp Taxi Medallion Use Agreement, please call Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, SFMTA Manager of Taxi Permits, at 415.701.4400.
NEXT STEPS. Does Not Meet Meets Xxxxxxxx for PGO next YES NO OVERALL Standard Standard school year RATING My signature below indicates that I have seen this evaluation. It does not necessarily indicate agreement with the findings. Date Counselor Exhibit E-3 RSD Evaluation Report – OT/PT Evaluation Report Occupational & Physical Therapist Name School Date Type of Evaluation Annual 90-day Other Comments must be made in each category. If an employee does not meet standard, justification will be included in the comment section.
NEXT STEPS. The BCTEA Parties will proceed with the 2022/23 Joint Transportation Plan submission process, review of Joint Plans and approvals. The Parties are planning a transportation evaluation in 2022 to assess whether the strategy has effectively addressed transportation issues for First Nation students attending BC public schools and, where necessary, identify and implement improvements and/or further options. APPENDIX A: DEFINITIONS The following definitions from the BCTEA support common interpretation of transportation-related Q&As:
NEXT STEPS. If you disagree with my findings you may request a hearing to appeal the decision by contacting me using the details provided. If you would like to discuss your application or if there is any confusion on how to proceed, you can write to, e-mail or telephone me. My contact details are shown at the top of this letter.
