JURISDICTION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS. This Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent (“Settlement”) is entered into voluntarily by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and [insert names or attach list of Respondents] (“Respondents”) and [insert names or, if there are many, attach appendix listing the settling federal agencies] (“Settling Federal Agencies” or “SFAs”)]. This Settlement provides for the performance of a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (“RI/FS”) [for the operable unit comprising _______] by Respondents and the payment by Respondents of certain response costs incurred by the United States, and the payment, by Settling Federal Agencies, of certain response costs incurred by the United States and Respondents at or in connection with the “[insert name] Site” (the “Site”) generally located at [address or description of location] in [city or town], ________ County, [state]. This Settlement is issued under the authority vested in the President of the United States by sections 104, 107, and 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). This authority was delegated to the Administrator of EPA on January 23, 1987, by Executive Order 12580, 52 Fed. Reg. 2923 (Jan. 29, 1987), and further delegated to Regional Administrators by EPA Delegation Nos. 14-14C (Administrative Actions through Consent Orders, Jan. 18, 2017) and 14‑14D (Cost Recovery Non-Judicial Agreements and Administrative Consent Orders, Jan. 18, 2017). [Insert if applicable: This authority was further redelegated by the Regional Administrator of EPA Region __ to the ______ (insert title of manager to whom delegation was made) by (insert numerical designations and dates of each Regional delegation).] In accordance with section 122(j)(1) of CERCLA, EPA notified [insert the relevant federal natural resource trustee(s)] on ____________, 20__ of negotiations with potentially responsible parties regarding the release of hazardous substances that may have resulted in injury to the natural resources under federal trusteeship and encouraged the trustee(s) to participate in the negotiation of this Settlement. EPA, the Respondents, and Settling Federal Agencies recognize that this Settlement has been negotiated in good faith and that the actions undertaken by Respondents, and payments made by the United States on behalf of Settling Federal Agencies, in accordance with this Settlement do not constitute an admission of any liability. Respondents and...
JURISDICTION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS. 1. This Administrative Order and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement Agreement") is entered into voluntarily by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the City of New York (“Respondent”). This Settlement Agreement is issued to Respondent by EPA pursuant to the authority vested in the President of the United States under Sections 104, 106, 107, and 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9604, 9606, 9607, 9622, which authority was delegated to the Administrator of EPA on January 23, 1987 by Executive Order 12580, 52 Fed. Reg. 2926 (1987). This authority was further delegated to the Regional Administrators of EPA on September 13, 1987 by EPA Delegation 14-14-C, and redelegated within Region 2 to the Director of the Emergency and Remedial Response Division by Regional Order No. R-1200, dated November 23, 2004.
JURISDICTION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS. 1. This Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent (“Settlement Agreement”) is entered into voluntarily by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) and The Dow Chemical Company (“Dow” or “Respondent”). This Settlement Agreement provides for Dow’s performance of a non-time critical removal action selected by U.S. EPA, and the payment of certain response costs incurred by the United States at or in connection with addressing soil contaminated with dioxins and furans at Middleground Island (“MGI”) of the Tittabawassee River, Saginaw River & Bay site (“TRSR&B Site”), Michigan, as defined in the Administrative Order on Consent (“2010 AOC”) entered in In The Matter of: The Dow Chemical Company, CERCLA Docket No. V-W-10-C-942, with an effective date of January 21, 2010.
JURISDICTION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS. 1. This Interim Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent (“Settlement”) is entered into voluntarily by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (the “Division”) and Atlantic Richfield Company (“Respondent”). This Settlement provides for:
JURISDICTION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS. 20.1 This agreement shall be subject to Portuguese law.
JURISDICTION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS. 2.1 This Settlement Agreement is entered into by the EPA, BLM, and the Forest Service under the authority vested in the President of the United States by Sections 104, 107, and 122 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9604, 9607, 9622(a), and 9622(d)(3). This Settlement Agreement is entered into by IDEQ pursuant to Idaho’s Environmental Protection & Health Act, Idaho Code §§ 39-101 to 39-130, the Hazardous Waste Management Act of Idaho, Idaho Code §§ 39-4401 to 39-4432, Idaho’s Water Quality Act, Idaho Code §§ 39-3601 et seq., and the rules and standards promulgated pursuant thereto. This Settlement Agreement is entered into by the Tribes pursuant to Section 107(a) of CERCLA, § 42 U.S.C. 9607(a).
JURISDICTION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS. 1. This Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent (Settlement Agreement) is entered into voluntarily by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 (EPA), NW Natural and Siltronic Corporation (Respondents). This Settlement Agreement provides for the performance of a response action investigation and design activities by Respondents and the payment of response costs incurred by the United States and Tribal Governments at or in connection with an area known as the GASCO Sediments Site within the boundaries of the Portland Harbor Superfund Site in Portland, Oregon. The response action is more fully described in the Statement of Work (“SOW”), Appendix A hereto, and consists of a final sediment remedial investigation, Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) and design for the Gasco Sediments Site.
JURISDICTION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS. 1. This Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent (Settlement) is entered into voluntarily by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State of Oregon, acting by and through the Department of State Lands (Department of State Lands or DSL), the City of Portland, and the Port of Portland (Respondents) as well as the United States Maritime Administration, the United States Coast Guard, the United States General Services Administration, the United States Bonneville Power Administration, the United States Department of Treasury, and the United States Department of Defense with respect to the Department of Navy and the Army Corps of Engineers (Settling Federal Agencies or SFAs) (collectively, EPA, Respondents and Settling Federal Agencies are “the Parties”). This Settlement provides for the performance of 100% Remedial Design (RD) of the Willamette Cove Project Area and the payment by Respondents and the United States on behalf of the SFAs of EPA Future Response Costs, ODEQ Response Costs, and Tribal Response Costs incurred at or in connection with the Work conducted under this Settlement related to the selected remedy for the in-river portion of the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (the Site) as defined in Section IV below.
JURISDICTION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS. 2. This Settlement Agreement is issued pursuant to the authority of the Attorney General to compromise and settle claims of the United States, and the authority vested in the President of the United States by CERCLA, and delegated to the Administrator of EPA by Executive Order No. 12580, 52 Fed. Reg. 2923 (Jan. 23, 1987).
JURISDICTION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS. 1. This Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent (Settlement) is entered into voluntarily by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and General Electric Company (GE or Respondent). This Settlement provides for the performance of testing and other investigative activities by Respondent in the Lower Xxxxxx River and the payment of certain response costs incurred by the United States at or in connection with the Xxxxxx River PCBs Site (Site), located primarily in New York State.
