Good Scientific Practice. The parties to this agreement undertake to comply with the Rules of Good Scientific Practice as defined in the TUM Code of Conduct / Ehrenkodex (see xxx.xxx.xx). The candidates are aware that according to § 6 (7) of the TUM Regulations for the Award of Doctoral Degrees scholarly work already submitted for examination purposes may not be re-submitted as part of the doctoral project.
Good Scientific Practice. The parties involved are committed to observing the guidelines that secure good scientific practice and deal with academic misconduct at the TUM (see xxx.xxx.xx). The doctoral candidate is aware that, according to § 6 section 7 of the TUM Regulations for the Award of Doctoral Degrees, his/her own work, having already been used for examination purposes, must not be submitted as a doctoral thesis. Attending a seminar on good scientific practice is recommended.
Good Scientific Practice. Scientific Writing ‣ Presentation Skills ‣ Data visualization 0.2 per day 1 Outreach activities Presentations at international conferences 1 CP/ talk; ½ CP/ poster 1 first author publications in international peer-reviewed journal 1 CP/ submitted 2 CP/ accepted 1 Non-first-author publication in international peer-reviewed journal 1 CP/ publication 0
Good Scientific Practice. The parties hereto undertake to comply with the Code of Conduct for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice and Procedures in Cases of Academic Misconduct (see xxx.xxx.xx). The notice of this code and procedures is confirmed with the signature below. The doctoral candidate is aware that according to § 6 (7) of the Regulations for the Award of Doctoral Degrees of TUM her/his scholarly work already submitted for examination purposes elsewhere must not be re-submitted as doctoral thesis or part of it.
Good Scientific Practice. The parties to this agreement undertake to adhere to the rules concerning good scientific practice and the handling of scientific misconduct (Richtlinien zur Sicherung Guter Wissenschaftlicher Praxis und den Umgang mit Fehlverhalten, see xxx.xxx.xx). The doctoral candidates are aware that according to § 6 (7) of the Regulations for the Award of Doctoral Degrees any scholarly work that has already been submitted for examination purposes may not be resubmitted as part of the doctoral project.
Good Scientific Practice. Both IBA and Boehringer Turkey undertake with regard to publications of the Results of the Project to adhere to the rules of Good Scientific Practice and the guidelines for publications of Project data as outlined e.g. by editors of the major medical journals as well as all ethical standards concerning publications and authorship.
Good Scientific Practice. All parties involved undertake to comply with the principles and guidelines laid down in the statutes of TU Munich for safeguarding good scientific practice and for dealing with scientific misconduct (see xxx.xxx.xx). The acknowledgement of these statutes is confirmed with the signature below. The doctoral candidate is aware that, in accordance with § 7 para. 7 of the TUM Regulations for the Award of Doctoral Degrees, his/her own work that has already served examination purposes may not be submitted as a doctoral thesis/dissertation or as part of a doctoral thesis/dissertation.
Good Scientific Practice. The doctoral candidate and the doctoral committee agree to observe the code `Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice` issued by the German Research Foundation (DFG). In case of LIfBi employees, all parties agree to additionally observe the rules for good scientific practice issued by LIfBi and members of the University of Bamberg additionally observe the respective rules of the university. In alleged cases of scientific misconduct, the parties concerned shall turn to the respective ombudsperson or his/her deputy.
Good Scientific Practice. The Charity expects the highest standards of integrity to be adhered to by the Host Institution and the Staff. The Host Institution must ensure that it has in place formal procedures for the investigation of allegations of scientific misconduct.
Good Scientific Practice. The candidate and supervisors commit to follow, in spirit and practice, the guidelines of good scientific practice as laid out by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and available on their website. The candidate commits to pro-actively inform them self of these guidelines at the beginning of the doctorate and is supported by the supervisors in their implementation. The candidate is expected to attend the Good Scientific Practice Seminar of the ISOS at least once during the doctorate. All parties commit to a policy of data transparency and recognize the obligation of the candidate to make all data available. Support by the ISOS: The ISOS offers an engaging network of scientists, discussion fora, specialized courses and partial financial assistance to the candidate for travel to meetings and conferences, for Doctoral Miniproposals and scientific fair mentoring. Only candidates who have complied with conducting the thesis committee meetings will be eligible for financial support. More information is available on the ISOS website. Conflict resolution: Even with the best of intentions, conflicts may arise. The Thesis Committee Meetings are explicitly the place to discuss these with all partners in open communication. Should external advice or mediation be required this can be sought from the Ombudspersons of Kiel University or the GEOMAR, the persons of trust at the Graduate Center and the ISOS. All partners agree to engage in conflict resolution in good faith and without reservation. By signing this document all partners agree to comply with the above, and affirm their commitment to contribute to a successful doctoral thesis. The undersigned apply to participate in the ISOS Doctoral Programme (xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/xxxx) and agree to the use of their data according to the data protection act Land Schleswig Holstein (LDSH, 9 Feb 2000) (see “Protecting your privacy” below). Place and Date Signature of the Candidate Place and Date Signature of the Primary Supervisor Place and Date Signature of the Co-Supervisor Place and Date Signature of the Co-Supervisor Contact information needed for application Doctoral Candidate Name Gender Nationality Last degree (X.Xx., Dipl. etc) Year Discipline Name and place of university Work Address (Institute) Work Telephone Nr. Private Email Title of the Doctoral Thesis Start of Doctoral research (mm/yy) Funding Source (Project Name / Stipend / other sources) Period of funding availability from (mm/yy) to (mm/yy) Link to your persona...
