Facility reviews Sample Clauses

Facility reviews. We may review your facility in accordance with any provision for review set out in the Facility Details (or, if no such provision is specified, annually), or at any time if there is or may be, in our opinion, a change of credit. If we ask you to, you must attend at an interview, and give us any documentation we ask you for.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Facility reviews. You must only use the money for the purpose set out in the Facility Details. We may review your facility in accordance with any provision for review set out in the Facility Details (or, if no such provision is specified, annually) or at any time if there is or may be, in our opinion, a change of credit. If we ask you to, you must attend at an interview, and give us any documentation we ask you for.
Facility reviews. A facility review of this directive shall be conducted at least annually.
Facility reviews. We may conduct a review of your facility at any time. If we ask you to, you must attend at an interview, and give us any documentation we ask you for.
Facility reviews. The Purchaser or its designee shall have the right, upon reasonable advance written notice and during regular business hours, to inspect the facilities being used by the Supplier for production of the Products solely to confirm that such facilities are adequate to meet the requirements of this Agreement, the Regulatory Xxxxxxxxx, XXX00000, and any applicable successors to those ISO requirements. Supplier shall reasonably cooperate with Purchaser and its designee with respect to such inspections. If any such inspection reveals that the manufacturing facilities do not satisfy such requirements, then the Purchaser shall provide written notice of such fact, which notice shall contain in reasonable detail the deficiencies found in the manufacturing facilities and, if practicable, those steps the Supplier should undertake in order to remedy such deficiencies. Any inspection made by the Purchaser under this section shall occur no more frequently than once each calendar quarter (unless otherwise required by law, including by direction of the Regulatory Authority) and shall be designed to cause the least amount of disruption to the operations of the Supplier as is reasonably possible. Such inspections shall be limited to the manufacture of Products, and shall not include any trade secrets or other confidential information unless the Purchaser and its designee (if applicable) has signed a confidentiality agreement reasonably satisfactory to the Supplier.
Facility reviews. MAKO will have the right, upon reasonable advance notice and during regular business hours, to inspect the facilities being used by PDEX for production of the Product to confirm that such facilities are adequate to meet the requirements of this Agreement, the prevailing Regulatory Authority, and EN ISO 13485, and any applicable successors to those EN requirements. If any such inspection reveals that the manufacturing facilities do not satisfy such requirements, then MAKO will provide written notice of such fact, which notice will contain in reasonable detail the deficiencies found in the manufacturing facilities and, if practicable, those steps PDEX should undertake in order to remedy such deficiencies.
Facility reviews. (a) Orthovita shall have the right to audit the Facility prior to the final delivery of the Collagen Lots provided that reasonable notice is given.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Facility reviews. MAKO Surgical will have the right, upon reasonable advance notice and during regular business hours, to inspect the facilities being used by Service Provider for production of the EPIK to confirm that such facilities are adequate to meet the requirements of this Agreement, the prevailing Regulatory Authority, and EN ISO 13485, and any applicable successors to those EN requirements. If any such inspection reveals that the manufacturing facilities do not satisfy such requirements, then MAKO Surgical will provide written notice of such fact, which notice will contain in reasonable detail the deficiencies found in the manufacturing facilities and, if practicable, those steps Service Provider should undertake in order to remedy such deficiencies.

Related to Facility reviews

  • Publicity Review Subject to the further provisions of this Section, no Party shall originate any written publicity, news release, or other announcement or statement relating to this Agreement or to performance hereunder or the existence of an arrangement between the Parties (collectively, "Written Disclosure"), without the prior prompt review and written approval of the other, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section, any Party may make any public Written Disclosure it believes in good faith based upon the advice of counsel is required by applicable law or any listing or trading agreement concerning its publicly traded securities, provided that prior to making such Written Disclosure, the disclosing Party shall provide the other Party with a copy of the materials proposed to be disclosed and provide the receiving Party with an opportunity to promptly review the proposed Written Disclosure. To the extent that the receiving Party reasonably requests that any information in the materials proposed to be disclosed be deleted, the disclosing Party shall request confidential treatment of such information pursuant to Rule 406 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Rule 26b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable (or any other applicable regulation relating to the confidential treatment of information), so that there be omitted from the materials that are publicly filed any information that the receiving Party reasonably requests to be deleted. The terms of this Agreement may also be disclosed to (i) government agencies where required by law, or (ii) Third Parties with the prior written consent of the other Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, so long as such disclosure is made under a binder of confidentiality and so long as highly sensitive terms and conditions such as financial terms are extracted from the Agreement or not disclosed upon the request of the other Party. All Written Disclosures shall be factual and as brief as is reasonable under the circumstances. Upon request by either Party, the Parties agree to prepare a mutually agreed press release and question and answer document with respect to this Agreement. Each Party agrees that all Written Disclosures and oral statements relating hereto shall be consistent with the answers specified in such question and answer document.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Environmental Review (a) Buyer shall have the right to conduct or cause a consultant (“Buyer’s Environmental Consultant”) to conduct an environmental review of the Assets and Seller’s records pertaining to the Assets (as set forth in Section 3.01) prior to the expiration of the Examination Period (“Buyer’s Environmental Review”). The cost and expense of Buyer’s Environmental Review, if any, shall be borne solely by Buyer. The scope of work comprising Buyer’s Environmental Review shall not include any intrusive test or procedure without the prior written consent of Seller. Buyer shall (and shall cause Buyer’s Environmental Consultant to): (i) consult with Seller before conducting any work comprising Buyer’s Environmental Review, (ii) perform all such work in a safe and workmanlike manner and so as to not unreasonably interfere with Seller’s operations and (iii) comply with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Seller shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain any Third Party consents and otherwise cooperate with Buyer in conducting Buyer’s Environmental Review and any activities related thereto. Seller shall have the right to have a representative or representatives accompany Buyer and Buyer’s Environmental Consultant at all times during Buyer’s Environmental Review. With respect to any samples taken in connection with Buyer’s Environmental Review, Buyer shall take split samples, providing one of each such sample, properly labeled and identified, to Seller. The Parties shall execute a “common undertaking” letter regarding the confidentiality for the Environmental Review where appropriate. Buyer hereby agrees to release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Seller from and against all claims, losses, damages, costs, expenses, causes of action and judgments of any kind or character (INCLUDING THOSE RESULTING FROM SELLER’S SOLE, JOINT, COMPARATIVE OR CONCURRENT NEGLIGENCE OR STRICT LIABILITY) to the extent arising out of Buyer’s Environmental Review. Buyer hereby covenants and agrees that it will have at least $2,000,000 of general liability insurance to cover its indemnification hereunder prior to the commencement of the Environmental Review.

  • Reviews (a) During the term of this Agreement and for 7 years after the term of this Agreement, the HSP agrees that the LHIN or its authorized representatives may conduct a Review of the HSP to confirm the HSP’s fulfillment of its obligations under this Agreement. For these purposes the LHIN or its authorized representatives may, upon 24 hours’ Notice to the HSP and during normal business hours enter the HSP’s premises to:

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Periodic Review of Costs of Environmental Compliance In the ordinary course of its business, the Company conducts a periodic review of the effect of Environmental Laws on the business, operations and properties of the Company and its subsidiaries, in the course of which it identifies and evaluates associated costs and liabilities (including, without limitation, any capital or operating expenditures required for clean-up, closure of properties or compliance with Environmental Laws or any permit, license or approval, any related constraints on operating activities and any potential liabilities to third parties). On the basis of such review and the amount of its established reserves, the Company has reasonably concluded that such associated costs and liabilities would not, individually or in the aggregate, result in a Material Adverse Change.

  • Periodic Due Diligence Review The Borrowers acknowledge that the Lender has the right to perform continuing due diligence reviews with respect to the Mortgage Loans, for purposes of verifying compliance with the representations, warranties and specifications made hereunder, or otherwise, and each Borrower agrees that upon reasonable (but no less than one (1) Business Day's) prior notice to such Borrower, the Lender or its authorized representatives will be permitted during normal business hours to examine, inspect, make copies of, and make extracts of, the Mortgage Files and any and all documents, records, agreements, instruments or information relating to such Mortgage Loans in the possession, or under the control, of such Borrower and/or the Custodian. The Borrowers also shall make available to the Lender a knowledgeable financial or accounting officer for the purpose of answering questions respecting the Mortgage Files and the Mortgage Loans. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the each Borrower acknowledges that the Lender shall make Advances to the Borrowers based solely upon the information provided by the Borrowers to the Lender in the Mortgage Loan Data Transmission and the representations, warranties and covenants contained herein, and that the Lender, at its option, has the right, at any time to conduct a partial or complete due diligence review on some or all of the Mortgage Loans securing such Advance, including, without limitation, ordering new credit reports, new appraisals on the related Mortgaged Properties and otherwise re-generating the information used to originate such Mortgage Loan. The Lender may underwrite such Mortgage Loans itself or engage a mutually agreed upon third party underwriter to perform such underwriting. Each Borrower agrees to cooperate with the Lender and any third party underwriter in connection with such underwriting, including, but not limited to, providing the Lender and any third party underwriter with access to any and all documents, records, agreements, instruments or information relating to such Mortgage Loans in the possession, or under the control, of such Borrower. In addition, the Lender has the right to perform continuing Due Diligence Reviews of each Borrower and its Affiliates, directors, officers, employees and significant shareholders. The Borrowers and Lender further agree that all out-of-pocket costs and expenses incurred by the Lender in connection with the Lender's activities pursuant to this Section 10.16 shall be paid for as agreed by such parties.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Credit Investigation In conjunction with your application for credit and, if approved, maintenance of your Account, you agree that we have the right to investigate your credit and employment history, to verify your credit references, to request and use credit reports, and to report the way you pay your Account to credit bureaus and other interested parties.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.