Evaluation Handbook Sample Clauses

Evaluation Handbook. The Lane Community College faculty Developmental Evaluation and Corrective Evaluation processes are the product of a collaborative faculty/administration effort. It is in the joint collegial interest of both the faculty and administration to develop and maintain the highest reasonable evaluation standard, which will result from the continuing collaboration of both parties in the ongoing evolution of the evaluation and developmental standards and processes. Therefore, the College and the Association have produced an Evaluation Handbook, which is limited to clarifying statements of the evaluation process, forms, checklists, and instructions. The College and Association will regularly review this Handbook and solicit suggestions for its improvement. Any proposed changes to the Handbook will be submitted to the Association and College labor relations representative for timely review for conformance with collectively bargained Agreements.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Handbook. All teachers new to the District will receive a copy of the evaluation handbook as part of the new employee packet. Other teachers may request a copy of the evaluation handbook from the District.
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation Handbook. The District in collaboration with the Association shall create and finalize an evaluation handbook as a reference tool by December 31, 2020.
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation Handbook. The content of the Evaluation Handbook shall be agreed upon by the parties and is part of the negotiated agreement. The procedures set forth in the handbook shall be implemented.
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation Handbook. The content of the Evaluation Handbook shall be agreed upon by the parties and is part of this Agreement. The procedures set forth in the handbook shall be implemented. Teacher evaluations shall follow the requirements as set out in SDCL Ch. 13-42.
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation Handbook. The Southwestern Oregon Community College faculty evaluation 9 (tenure track and tenured evaluation) processes are the product of a collaborative 10 faculty/administration effort. It is in the joint collegial interest of both the faculty and 11 administration to develop and maintain the highest reasonable evaluation standard, which 12 will result from the continuing collaboration of both parties in the ongoing evolution of 13 the evaluation and developmental standards and processes. Therefore, the College and 14 the Faculty Senate have produced an Evaluation Handbook, which is limited to clarifying 15 statements of the evaluation process, forms, checklists, and instructions. The College and
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation Handbook

  • Evaluation Plan The systematic blueprint detailing the evaluation aspects of the project.

  • Employee Handbook (A) If the Contractor has an employee handbook, the Contractor shall include the following information:

  • Department Review If a mutually acceptable solution has not been reached during Step 1, and the employee intends to pursue the grievance formally, the employee shall submit the grievance in writing on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form to the Department Head with a copy to the Labor Relations Division not later than ten (10) working days after the supervisor’s written response. The Department Head shall consider the grievance and render a written decision within ten (10) working days of receipt of the formal grievance. The written decision shall include a clear and concise statement including the reason(s) for the decision. The Department Head may hold a meeting with the employee to achieve any of the following purposes: 1) to identify why the employee feels there is a grievance and facilitate communication and resolution; 2) to clearly identify issues and areas of agreement/disagreement; and 3) to have the parties present whatever available information/ documentation necessary to fully attempt to resolve the grievance. The employee may be accompanied by his/her shop xxxxxxx during the Department Review, provided that the xxxxxxx is in the same department as the employee, and has been identified by the employee on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form. If the department, in consultation with the Labor Relations Division, determines that the grievance is outside of the Department Head’s authority, or the grievance involves employees working in separate departments, then such grievance shall be submitted to Step 3.

  • Evaluation Forms a. Performance evaluation forms will at a minimum include the following:

  • Policies and Procedures i) The policies and procedures of the designated employer apply to the employee while working at both sites.

  • Quality Assurance Plan The contractor shall develop and submit to NMFS a contractor Quality Assurance Plan, as referenced in Section F.5.3, which details how the contractor will ensure effectiveness and efficiency of collection efforts as well as the quality of data collected by its At-Sea Monitors. The contractor shall further establish, implement, and maintain a Quality Assurance Management program to ensure consistent quality of all work products and services performed under this contract.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.