Drug Utilization Review Sample Clauses

Drug Utilization Review. Compliance with Formularies and Provider ----------------------------------------------------------------- Manual. Provider shall (1) cooperate with ESI's procedures for drug ------ utilization review and generic substitution, as set forth from time to time in the Provider Manual; (2) comply with ESI's procedures for calling prescribers to facilitate generic substitution and Formulary compliance, and other programs established by a Sponsor; and (3) comply with the Provider Manual. Provider shall use commercially reasonable efforts to comply with the applicable Formulary when dispensing Covered Medications to Members. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in no event will Provider (i) attempt to switch a Member's prescription to a drug that is not a Formulary drug on the applicable Formulary, except for generic substitution opportunities or where required by medical necessity. Provider agrees that ESI's manufacturer agreements, therapeutic programs and formularies take precedence with the manufacturers over any such agreements or programs to which Provider is a party with respect to Covered Medications dispensed to Members. Provider will not implement any substitution program for Members of Prescription Drug Programs that is inconsistent with such Prescription Drug Program, including the applicable Formulary.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Drug Utilization Review. The Health Plan shall design and implement a drug utilization review (DUR) program designed to encourage coordination between an enrollee’s primary care physician and a prescriber of a psychotropic or similar prescription drug for behavioral health problems. The Health Plan’s DUR program shall identify those medications for other serious medical conditions (such as hypertension, diabetes, neurological disorders, or cardiac problems), where this is a significant risk to the enrollee posed by potential drug interactions between drugs for these conditions and behavioral-related drugs. After the Health Plan identifies the potential for such problems, the Health Plan’s DUR program shall notify all related prescribers that certain drugs may be contra-indicated due to the potential for drug interactions and shall encourage the prescribers to coordinate their care. Notice may be provided electronically or via mail, or by telephonic or direct consultation, as the Health Plan deems appropriate. AHCA Contract No. FA904, Attachment II, Page 88 of 186 WellCare of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Staywell Health Plan of Florida Medicaid HMO Non-Reform Contract
Drug Utilization Review. The Health Plan shall design and implement a drug utilization review (DUR) program designed to encourage coordination between an enrollee’s primary care physician and a prescriber of a psychotropic or similar prescription drug for behavioral health problems. The Health Plan’s DUR program shall identify those medications for other serious medical conditions (such as hypertension, diabetes, neurological disorders, or cardiac problems), where this is a significant risk to the enrollee posed by potential drug interactions between drugs for these conditions and behavioral-related drugs. After the AHCA Contract No. FA972, Attachment II, Page 98 of 285 WellCare of Florida, Inc., Medicaid HMO Non-Reform Contract d/b/a HealthEase Health Plan identifies the potential for such problems, the Health Plan’s DUR program shall notify all related prescribers that certain drugs may be contra-indicated due to the potential for drug interactions and shall encourage the prescribers to coordinate their care. Notice may be provided electronically or via mail, or by telephonic or direct consultation, as the Health Plan deems appropriate.
Drug Utilization Review. Xxxxx will provide concurrent drug utilization review services through edits applied during Claims Processing in order to assist the dispensing pharmacist and prescribing physician in identifying potential drug interactions, incorrect prescriptions or dosages, and certain other circumstances that may be indicative of inappropriate prescription drug usage. Xxxxx’x utilization review services are not intended to substitute for the professional judgment of the prescriber, the dispensing pharmacist or any other health care professional providing services to the Member. Client or its third party designee (as applicable) will have the final responsibility for all decisions with respect to coverage of a Claim and the benefits allowable under the Plan, including determining whether any rejected or disputed claim will be allowed.
Drug Utilization Review. Benecard will review both concurrently and retrospectively Claims for potential fraud, waste, abuse, and clinical appropriateness. Claims are reviewed daily from the previous day to ensure such Claims are being prescribed based on clinically appropriate and FDA approved guidelines, including but not limited to, duplicate therapy, refill too soon, gender appropriate, age appropriate, cost and quantities. Fraud, waste and abuse Claims are also reviewed retrospectively each calendar quarter, reported and tracked until resolution of the case is completed and when applicable, notified to the Group.
Drug Utilization Review. CHLIC shall perform a concurrent Drug Utilization Review (“DUR”) analysis of each prescription submitted for processing, which may include: (1) prescribed dosage within a safe range; (2) drug-to-drug interaction; (3) drug-to- allergy interaction; (4) age-to-drug interaction; (5) duplicate therapy; (6) quantity limitations; and (7) days' supply.CHLIC's DUR processes shall not override or substitute for the prescriber's, the pharmacist's or other health care provider's professional judgment. 4.
Drug Utilization Review. Both parties agree to maintain and participate in, the Drug Utilization Management Program. This program shall be administered in accordance with applicable Benefit Program requirements and shall include medication therapy management programs.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Drug Utilization Review. For all populations eligible for covered services under this Contract, the Contractor shall:

Related to Drug Utilization Review

  • Commercialization Reports Throughout the term of this Agreement and during the Sell-Off Period, and within thirty (30) days of December 31st of each year, Company will deliver to University written reports of Company’s and Sublicensees’ efforts and plans to develop and commercialize the innovations covered by the Licensed Rights and to make and sell Licensed Products. Company will have no obligation to prepare commercialization reports in years where (a) Company delivers to University a written Sales Report with active sales, and (b) Company has fulfilled all Performance Milestones. In relation to each of the Performance Milestones each commercialization report will include sufficient information to demonstrate achievement of those Performance Milestones and will set out timeframes and plans for achieving those Performance Milestones which have not yet been met.

  • Regulatory Compliance Cooperation (a) CIT/VC agrees to use commercially reasonable best efforts to avoid the occurrence of a Regulatory Problem. In the event that CIT/VC determines that it has a Regulatory Problem, the Company agrees to use commercially reasonable efforts to take all such actions as are reasonably requested by CIT/VC in order (A) to effectuate and facilitate any transfer by CIT/VC of any Securities of the Company then held by CIT/VC to any Person designated by CIT/VC (subject, however, to compliance with Section 3 of this Agreement), (B) to permit CIT/VC (or any Affiliate of CIT/VC) to exchange all or any portion of the voting Securities of the Company then held by such Person on a share-for-share basis for shares of a class of non-voting Securities of the Company, which non-voting Securities shall be identical in all respects to such voting Securities, except that such new Securities shall be non-voting and shall be convertible into voting Securities on such terms as are requested by CIT/VC in light of regulatory considerations then prevailing, and (C) to continue and preserve the respective allocation of the voting interests with respect to the Company arising out of CIT/VC's ownership of voting Securities of the Company and/or provided for in this Agreement before the transfers and amendments referred to above (including entering into such additional agreements as are requested by CIT/VC to permit any Person(s) designated by CIT/VC to exercise any voting power which is relinquished by CIT/VC upon any exchange of voting Securities for nonvoting Securities of the Company); and the Company shall enter into such additional agreements, adopt such amendments to this Agreement, the Company's Charter and the Company's By-laws and other relevant agreements and taking such additional actions, in each case as are reasonably requested by CIT/VC in order to effectuate the intent of the foregoing. If CIT/VC elects to transfer Securities of the Company to a Regulated Holder in order to avoid a Regulatory Problem, the Company shall enter into such agreements with such Regulated Holder as it may reasonably request in order to assist such Regulated Holder in complying with applicable laws, and regulations to which it is subject. Such agreements may include restrictions on the 39. redemption, repurchase or retirement of Securities of the Company that would result or be reasonably expected to result in such Regulated Holder holding more voting securities or total securities (equity and debt) than it is permitted to hold under such laws and regulations.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.